Suppr超能文献

在专科姑息治疗环境中实现对死亡地点的偏好。

Delivering preference for place of death in a specialist palliative care setting.

作者信息

Oxenham David, Finucane Anne, Arnold Elizabeth, Russell Papiya

出版信息

BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2013 Aug 21;2(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u201375.w897. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Over the last 10 years, one of the key themes of public policy in palliative care has been achievement of choice in place of death. In Marie Curie Hospice Edinburgh a baseline audit conducted in 2006 showed that only a small proportion (18%) of patients referred to hospice services died at home. The audit also revealed that only 31% of those who expressed a preference to die at home were able to do so, whereas 91% of those who chose a setting other than home achieved their preference. Overall achievement of preferred place of death was 56%. However a significant number of patients (29%) did not have a recorded preference. A programme of quality improvement has continued over the last 7 years to improve identification, communication and achievement of preferred place of death for all patients. The mechanisms to change practice have been: changes to documentation; changes to clinical systems to support use of documentation; support for clinical staff to recognise the value of discussing preferences; and support for clinical staff to develop new skills. In addition the programme has been incorporated into local clinical strategy and this has enabled gaps in service to be addressed with a new service to support early discharge of those patients who wish to die at home. A recent audit showed that all patients had a recorded preference or a documented reason why their preference was unclarified. One third of patients died at home - nearly double the proportion that died at home in the baseline audit. Seventy one per cent of patients who wished to die at home actually died at home - a substantial increase from 31% at baseline. Achievement of preferred place of death for patients wishing to die in the hospice remained high at 88%. The focus on assessment of preference for place of death has led to substantial improvements in the identification and achievement of preference for patients dying under the care of the hospice. Furthermore, it has been associated with an increase in the overall proportion of patients who die at home.

摘要

在过去10年里,姑息治疗公共政策的一个关键主题是实现死亡地点的选择。在爱丁堡玛丽居里临终关怀医院,2006年进行的一次基线审计显示,转介至临终关怀服务的患者中,只有一小部分(18%)在家中死亡。该审计还显示,只有31%表示希望在家中死亡的患者能够如愿,而选择非家中地点死亡的患者中,91%实现了他们的选择。总体而言,首选死亡地点的达成率为56%。然而,相当数量的患者(29%)没有记录在案的偏好。在过去7年里,持续开展了一项质量改进计划,以改善对所有患者首选死亡地点的识别、沟通和实现情况。改变做法的机制包括:文件记录的改变;支持文件使用的临床系统的改变;支持临床工作人员认识到讨论偏好的价值;以及支持临床工作人员发展新技能。此外,该计划已纳入当地临床战略,这使得能够通过一项新服务来解决服务差距,以支持那些希望在家中死亡的患者早日出院。最近的一次审计显示,所有患者都有记录在案的偏好或关于其偏好未明确的书面原因。三分之一 的患者在家中死亡——几乎是基线审计中在家中死亡比例的两倍。希望在家中死亡的患者中有71%实际在家中死亡——从基线时的31%大幅增加。希望在临终关怀医院死亡的患者首选死亡地点的达成率仍高达88%。对死亡地点偏好评估的关注,已使临终关怀医院护理下的患者在偏好识别和实现方面有了显著改善。此外,它还与在家中死亡的患者总体比例增加有关。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

1
Location of Terminal Care in Pulmonary Hypertension.肺动脉高压终末期治疗的位置
CJC Open. 2025 Apr 15;7(6):832-839. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.03.026. eCollection 2025 Jun.

本文引用的文献

3
4
Achieving a good death for all.让所有人都能善终。
BMJ. 2010 Sep 16;341:c4861. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4861.
5
Factors associated with congruence between preferred and actual place of death.与期望死亡地点和实际死亡地点一致相关的因素。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Mar;39(3):591-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.07.007. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验