Raheem Omer A, Su Jeannie J, Wilson Joel R, Hsieh Tung-Chin
1 University of California, San Diego, Department of Urology, San Diego, CA, USA.
2 Yale School of Medicine, Department of Urology, New Haven, CT, USA.
Am J Mens Health. 2017 May;11(3):552-563. doi: 10.1177/1557988316630305. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
Despite strong association between erectile dysfunction (ED) and cardiovascular disease (CVD), there is a paucity of clear clinical guidelines detailing when and how to evaluate for ED in patients with known CVD, or vice versa. This systematic review discuss the role of cardiologists and urologists in the characterization of risk and management of CVD in the setting of ED, as well as contrasting the current evaluation of CVD and ED from the standpoint of published consensus statements. A comprehensive literature review utilizing MEDLINE®, the Cochrane Library® Central Search, and the Web of Science was performed to identify all published peer-reviewed articles in the English language describing ED and CVD across various disciplines. There is strong consensus that men with ED should be considered at high risk of CVD. Available risk assessment tools should be used to stratify the coronary risk score in each patient. The 2012 Princeton III Consensus Conference expanded on existing cardiovascular recommendations, proposing an approach to the evaluation and management of cardiovascular risk in men with ED and no known CVD. This systematic review highlights the similarities and differences of the existing clinical guidelines and recommendations regarding assessment and management of ED and CVD, as well as the pathophysiological linkage between ED and CVD, which may permit physicians, including urologists, to perform opportunistic screening and initiate secondary prophylaxis with regard to cardiovascular risk factors, particularly in young, nondiabetic men with ED.
尽管勃起功能障碍(ED)与心血管疾病(CVD)之间存在密切关联,但缺乏明确的临床指南详细说明在已知患有CVD的患者中何时以及如何评估ED,反之亦然。本系统评价讨论了心脏病专家和泌尿科医生在ED背景下对CVD风险特征描述和管理中的作用,并从已发表的共识声明的角度对比了当前对CVD和ED的评估。利用MEDLINE®、Cochrane图书馆®中央检索库和科学网进行了全面的文献综述,以识别所有以英文发表的、跨学科描述ED和CVD的同行评审文章。人们强烈共识是,患有ED的男性应被视为CVD的高危人群。应使用现有的风险评估工具对每位患者的冠状动脉风险评分进行分层。2012年普林斯顿III共识会议扩展了现有的心血管建议,提出了一种对患有ED且无已知CVD的男性进行心血管风险评估和管理的方法。本系统评价强调了关于ED和CVD评估与管理的现有临床指南和建议的异同,以及ED和CVD之间的病理生理联系,这可能使包括泌尿科医生在内的医生能够进行机会性筛查,并针对心血管危险因素启动二级预防,特别是在患有ED的年轻非糖尿病男性中。