• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

幼儿第二语言习得:年龄效应还是输入效应?都不是,还是两者皆有?

Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?

作者信息

Unsworth Sharon

机构信息

Radboud University,Nijmegen.

出版信息

J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):608-34. doi: 10.1017/S030500091500080X. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1017/S030500091500080X
PMID:26915919
Abstract

This paper explores whether there is evidence for age and/or input effects in child L2 acquisition across three different linguistic domains, namely morphosyntax, vocabulary, and syntax-semantics. More specifically, it compares data from English-speaking children whose age of onset to L2 Dutch was between one and three years with data from children whose age of onset was between four and seven years in their acquisition of verb morphology, verb placement, vocabulary, and direct object scrambling. The main findings were that there were no significant differences between the two groups in any of these areas and, with the exception of scrambling, current amount of exposure was the only factor significantly related to children's scores. The paper discusses the theoretical significance of these findings with respect to the role of input in the language acquisition process and the claim that there is a critical period ending within (early) childhood.

摘要

本文探讨了在儿童第二语言习得过程中,跨越形态句法、词汇和句法-语义这三个不同语言领域,是否存在年龄和/或输入效应的证据。更具体地说,它将母语为英语、第二语言荷兰语起始年龄在1至3岁的儿童的数据,与起始年龄在4至7岁的儿童在动词形态、动词位置、词汇和直接宾语移位习得方面的数据进行了比较。主要研究结果是,两组儿童在这些领域中的任何一个都没有显著差异,并且除了移位之外,当前的接触量是与儿童成绩显著相关的唯一因素。本文讨论了这些研究结果在输入在语言习得过程中的作用方面的理论意义,以及关于存在一个在(幼儿)期内结束的关键期这一说法。

相似文献

1
Early child L2 acquisition: Age or input effects? Neither, or both?幼儿第二语言习得:年龄效应还是输入效应?都不是,还是两者皆有?
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):608-34. doi: 10.1017/S030500091500080X. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
2
The sooner the better? An investigation into the role of age of onset and its relation with transfer and exposure in bilingual Frisian-Dutch children.越快越好?对弗里斯兰语-荷兰语双语儿童的发病年龄作用及其与语言转换和语言接触关系的调查。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):581-607. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000574. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
3
How do verbal short-term memory and working memory relate to the acquisition of vocabulary and grammar? A comparison between first and second language learners.言语短期记忆和工作记忆与词汇和语法习得之间有怎样的关系?第一语言学习者与第二语言学习者的比较。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Jan;141:65-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2015.06.015. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
4
"Which mouse kissed the frog?" Effects of age of onset, length of exposure, and knowledge of case marking on the comprehension of wh-questions in German-speaking simultaneous and early sequential bilingual children.“哪只老鼠吻了青蛙?”发病年龄、接触时长以及格标记知识对德语同声传译和早期连续双语儿童理解特殊疑问句的影响。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):635-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000916000015. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
5
Past tense production by English second language learners with and without language impairment.英语作为第二语言的学习者有无语言障碍时的过去时产出。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013 Feb;56(1):281-94. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0112). Epub 2012 Jun 28.
6
Chinese L1 children's English L2 verb morphology over time: individual variation in long-term outcomes.中国母语为中文的儿童第二语言英语动词形态随时间的变化:长期结果的个体差异。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):553-80. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000562. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
7
Semantic generality, input frequency and the acquisition of syntax.语义普遍性、输入频率与句法习得
J Child Lang. 2004 Feb;31(1):61-99.
8
Input and Age-Dependent Variation in Second Language Learning: A Connectionist Account.第二语言学习中的输入与年龄依赖性变化:一种联结主义解释。
Cogn Sci. 2018 May;42 Suppl 2(Suppl Suppl 2):519-554. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12519. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
9
Older age of onset in child L2 acquisition can be facilitative: evidence from the acquisition of English passives by Spanish natives.儿童第二语言习得中较晚的起始年龄可能具有促进作用:来自西班牙母语者习得英语被动语态的证据。
J Child Lang. 2016 May;43(3):662-86. doi: 10.1017/S0305000915000549. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
10
Linguistic transfer in bilingual children with specific language impairment.双语语言障碍儿童的语言迁移。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2012 Mar-Apr;47(2):176-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-6984.2011.00092.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Interaction in bilingual early speech acquisition: Acceleration in the bilingual acquisition of English liquids for English-Spanish bilinguals.双语早期语言习得中的交互作用:英-西双语者在英语流音双语习得中的加速现象。
Lingua. 2023 Jan;281. doi: 10.1016/j.lingua.2022.103438. Epub 2022 Nov 30.
2
Being a heritage speaker matters: the role of markedness in subject-verb person agreement in Italian.作为一名传承语使用者很重要:标记性在意大利语主谓人称一致中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 14;15:1321614. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1321614. eCollection 2024.
3
Processing pro-drop features in heritage Turkish.
处理土耳其传统语中的脱落主语特征。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 15;13:988550. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.988550. eCollection 2022.
4
Parental Report via a Mobile App in the Context of Early Language Trajectories: StarWords Study Protocol.基于早期语言轨迹的移动应用程序中的家长报告:StarWords 研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(5):3067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053067.
5
Effects of L1 Transfer Are Profound, Yet Native-Like Processing Strategy Is Attainable: Evidence From Advanced Learners' Production of Complex L2 Chinese Structures.L1迁移的影响是深远的,但类似母语的加工策略是可以实现的:来自高级学习者产出复杂汉语二语结构的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Dec 3;12:794500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.794500. eCollection 2021.
6
Crosslinguistic Influence (CLI) of Lexical Breadth and Depth in the Vocabulary of Bilingual Kindergarten Children - A Bilingual Intervention Study.双语幼儿园儿童词汇广度和深度的跨语言影响——一项双语干预研究
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:671928. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.671928. eCollection 2021.
7
The Age Factor Revisited: Timing in Acquisition Interacts With Age of Onset in Bilingual Acquisition.重新审视年龄因素:双语习得中的习得时间与起始年龄相互作用。
Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 14;9:2732. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02732. eCollection 2018.