Tudorica Alina, Oh Karen Y, Chui Stephen Y-C, Roy Nicole, Troxell Megan L, Naik Arpana, Kemmer Kathleen A, Chen Yiyi, Holtorf Megan L, Afzal Aneela, Springer Charles S, Li Xin, Huang Wei
Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Transl Oncol. 2016 Feb;9(1):8-17. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2015.11.016. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
The purpose is to compare quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics with imaging tumor size for early prediction of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and evaluation of residual cancer burden (RCB). Twenty-eight patients with 29 primary breast tumors underwent DCE-MRI exams before, after one cycle of, at midpoint of, and after NACT. MRI tumor size in the longest diameter (LD) was measured according to the RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors) guidelines. Pharmacokinetic analyses of DCE-MRI data were performed with the standard Tofts and Shutter-Speed models (TM and SSM). After one NACT cycle the percent changes of DCE-MRI parameters K(trans) (contrast agent plasma/interstitium transfer rate constant), ve (extravascular and extracellular volume fraction), kep (intravasation rate constant), and SSM-unique τi (mean intracellular water lifetime) are good to excellent early predictors of pathologic complete response (pCR) vs. non-pCR, with univariate logistic regression C statistics value in the range of 0.804 to 0.967. ve values after one cycle and at NACT midpoint are also good predictors of response, with C ranging 0.845 to 0.897. However, RECIST LD changes are poor predictors with C = 0.609 and 0.673, respectively. Post-NACT K(trans), τi, and RECIST LD show statistically significant (P < .05) correlations with RCB. The performances of TM and SSM analyses for early prediction of response and RCB evaluation are comparable. In conclusion, quantitative DCE-MRI parameters are superior to imaging tumor size for early prediction of therapy response. Both TM and SSM analyses are effective for therapy response evaluation. However, the τi parameter derived only with SSM analysis allows the unique opportunity to potentially quantify therapy-induced changes in tumor energetic metabolism.
目的是比较定量动态对比增强(DCE)磁共振成像(MRI)指标与成像肿瘤大小,以早期预测乳腺癌对新辅助化疗(NACT)的反应并评估残余癌负担(RCB)。28例患有29个原发性乳腺肿瘤的患者在NACT之前、一个周期后、中点时以及之后接受了DCE-MRI检查。根据实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)指南测量MRI肿瘤最长径(LD)。使用标准的Tofts模型和快门速度模型(TM和SSM)对DCE-MRI数据进行药代动力学分析。在一个NACT周期后,DCE-MRI参数Ktrans(造影剂血浆/组织间隙转移速率常数)、ve(血管外和细胞外体积分数)、kep(内渗速率常数)以及SSM独有的τi(平均细胞内水寿命)的百分比变化是病理完全缓解(pCR)与非pCR的良好至优秀的早期预测指标,单因素逻辑回归C统计值在0.804至0.967范围内。一个周期后和NACT中点时的ve值也是反应的良好预测指标,C值范围为0.845至0.897。然而,RECIST LD变化是较差的预测指标,C值分别为0.609和0.673。NACT后的Ktrans、τi和RECIST LD与RCB显示出统计学显著相关性(P <.05)。TM和SSM分析在早期预测反应和RCB评估方面的表现相当。总之,定量DCE-MRI参数在早期预测治疗反应方面优于成像肿瘤大小。TM和SSM分析在治疗反应评估方面均有效。然而,仅通过SSM分析得出的τi参数提供了潜在量化治疗引起的肿瘤能量代谢变化的独特机会。