• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.向公众传达不确定的科学:不确定性的数量和来源如何影响宿命论、反弹和过载。
Risk Anal. 2017 Jan;37(1):40-51. doi: 10.1111/risa.12600. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
2
How the public evaluates media representations of uncertain science: An integrated explanatory framework.公众如何评价不确定科学的媒体呈现:一个综合的解释框架。
Public Underst Sci. 2023 May;32(4):410-427. doi: 10.1177/09636625221122960. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
3
Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash.包括癌症研究新闻报道的局限性:新闻回避对宿命论、医学怀疑论、患者信任和反弹的影响。
J Health Commun. 2011 May;16(5):486-503. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546491.
4
The Impact of Communicating Uncertainty on Public Responses to Precision Medicine Research.沟通不确定性对公众对精准医学研究反应的影响。
Ann Behav Med. 2021 Oct 27;55(11):1048-1061. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaab050.
5
Beyond dose assessment: using risk with full disclosure of uncertainty in public and scientific communication.超越剂量评估:在公共和科学交流中充分披露不确定性的风险。
Health Phys. 2011 Nov;101(5):591-600. doi: 10.1097/HP.0b013e318225c2e1.
6
Revisiting nutrition backlash: Psychometric properties and discriminant validity of the nutrition backlash scale.重新审视营养抵制:营养抵制量表的心理测量特性和区分效度
Nutrition. 2020 Oct;78:110949. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110949. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
7
Leaping "out of the doubt"--nutrition advice: values at stake in communicating scientific uncertainty to the public.跳出“疑虑”——营养建议:向公众传达科学不确定性时所涉及的利害关系。
Health Care Anal. 2008 Jun;16(2):176-91. doi: 10.1007/s10728-007-0054-8. Epub 2007 Jun 28.
8
Public perception and communication of scientific uncertainty.公众对科学不确定性的认知和交流。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2017 Feb;146(2):286-304. doi: 10.1037/xge0000260.
9
Content and effects of news stories about uncertain cancer causes and preventive behaviors.关于不确定的癌症病因和预防行为的新闻报道内容及影响。
Health Commun. 2014;29(4):332-46. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2012.755603. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
10
Expressions of uncertainty in online science communication hinder information diffusion.在线科学传播中的不确定性表达阻碍了信息传播。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Oct 4;3(10):pgae439. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae439. eCollection 2024 Oct.

引用本文的文献

1
Linking genetic counseling communication skills to patient outcomes and experiences using a community-engagement and provider-engagement approach: research protocol for the GC-PRO mixed methods sequential explanatory study.采用社区参与和提供者参与方法将遗传咨询沟通技巧与患者结果和体验联系起来:GC-PRO 混合方法序贯解释研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 17;14(4):e085472. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085472.
2
Communicating scientific uncertainty in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: A message experiment.新冠疫情早期的科学不确定性交流:一项信息实验。
Risk Anal. 2024 Jul;44(7):1700-1715. doi: 10.1111/risa.14256. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Trust and consequences: Role of community science, perceptions, values, and environmental justice in risk communication.信任与后果:社区科学、观念、价值观和环境公正在风险沟通中的作用。
Risk Anal. 2022 Nov;42(11):2362-2375. doi: 10.1111/risa.14020. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
4
Public engagement and argumentation in science.科学中的公众参与和论证
Eur J Philos Sci. 2022;12(3):54. doi: 10.1007/s13194-022-00480-y. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Examining Rural-Urban Differences in Fatalism and Information Overload: Data from 12 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers.审视宿命论和信息过载城乡差异:来自 12 个 NCI 指定癌症中心的数据。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2022 Feb;31(2):393-403. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-0355. Epub 2022 Jan 28.
6
Communication of Uncertainty about Preliminary Evidence and the Spread of Its Inferred Misinformation during the COVID-19 Pandemic-A Weibo Case Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,关于初步证据的不确定性的沟通以及其推断的错误信息的传播——以微博为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11933. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211933.
7
Psychological Impact of Ambiguous Health Messages about COVID-19.新冠病毒健康信息模棱两可的心理影响
J Behav Med. 2022 Apr;45(2):159-171. doi: 10.1007/s10865-021-00266-2. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
8
Effects of communicating uncertainty descriptions in hazard identification, risk characterization, and risk protection.危害识别、风险特征描述和风险保护中不确定性描述沟通的影响。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 13;16(7):e0253762. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253762. eCollection 2021.
9
From information seeking to information avoidance: Understanding the health information behavior during a global health crisis.从信息寻求到信息回避:理解全球健康危机期间的健康信息行为
Inf Process Manag. 2021 Mar;58(2):102440. doi: 10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102440. Epub 2020 Nov 29.
10
The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.风险沟通领域的发展演进。
Risk Anal. 2020 Nov;40(S1):2240-2262. doi: 10.1111/risa.13615. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Lost in Translation? A Comparison of Cancer-Genetics Reporting in the Press Release and its Subsequent Coverage in Lay Press.翻译有误?新闻稿中癌症遗传学报告与其随后在大众媒体中的报道对比
Sci Commun. 2009 Jun;30(4):453-474. doi: 10.1177/1075547009332649.
2
Against conventional wisdom: when the public, the media, and medical practice collide.与传统观念相悖:当公众、媒体与医疗实践发生冲突时。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2013;13 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-S3-S4. Epub 2013 Dec 6.
3
The cancer information overload (CIO) scale: establishing predictive and discriminant validity.癌症信息过载(CIO)量表:建立预测效度和区分效度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Jan;94(1):90-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.09.016. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
4
Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientists' credibility.公众科学争议中的矛盾故事:新闻融合与分歧对科学家可信度的影响。
Public Underst Sci. 2012 Aug;21(6):689-704. doi: 10.1177/0963662510387759. Epub 2010 Nov 23.
5
Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence.临床证据不确定性沟通中的概念、方法和伦理问题。
Med Care Res Rev. 2013 Feb;70(1 Suppl):14S-36S. doi: 10.1177/1077558712459361. Epub 2012 Nov 6.
6
Visualizing uncertainty about the future.可视化未来的不确定性。
Science. 2011 Sep 9;333(6048):1393-400. doi: 10.1126/science.1191181.
7
Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash.包括癌症研究新闻报道的局限性:新闻回避对宿命论、医学怀疑论、患者信任和反弹的影响。
J Health Commun. 2011 May;16(5):486-503. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2010.546491.
8
Communication of uncertainty regarding individualized cancer risk estimates: effects and influential factors.不确定性沟通与个体化癌症风险估计:影响因素及效果。
Med Decis Making. 2011 Mar-Apr;31(2):354-66. doi: 10.1177/0272989X10371830. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
9
Does Local Television News Coverage Cultivate Fatalistic Beliefs about Cancer Prevention?地方电视台的新闻报道会培养人们对癌症预防的宿命论信念吗?
J Commun. 2010 Jun 1;60(2):230-253. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01474.x.
10
Making sense of cancer news coverage trends: a comparison of three comprehensive content analyses.解读癌症新闻报道趋势:三项综合内容分析比较。
J Health Commun. 2010 Mar;15(2):136-51. doi: 10.1080/10810730903528025.

向公众传达不确定的科学:不确定性的数量和来源如何影响宿命论、反弹和过载。

Communicating Uncertain Science to the Public: How Amount and Source of Uncertainty Impact Fatalism, Backlash, and Overload.

机构信息

Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.

出版信息

Risk Anal. 2017 Jan;37(1):40-51. doi: 10.1111/risa.12600. Epub 2016 Mar 12.

DOI:10.1111/risa.12600
PMID:26973157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5018910/
Abstract

Public dissemination of scientific research often focuses on the finding (e.g., nanobombs kill lung cancer) rather than the uncertainty/limitations (e.g., in mice). Adults (n = 880) participated in an experiment where they read a manipulated news report about cancer research (a) that contained either low or high uncertainty (b) that was attributed to the scientists responsible for the research (disclosure condition) or an unaffiliated scientist (dueling condition). Compared to the dueling condition, the disclosure condition triggered less prevention-focused cancer fatalism and nutritional backlash.

摘要

科学研究的公开传播通常侧重于研究结果(例如,纳米炸弹能杀死肺癌),而不是不确定性/局限性(例如,在老鼠身上)。880 名成年人参与了一项实验,他们阅读了一份关于癌症研究的操纵新闻报道(a),该报道包含低不确定性或高不确定性(b),并归因于负责研究的科学家(披露条件)或一个不相关的科学家(决斗条件)。与决斗条件相比,披露条件引发的预防为重点的癌症宿命论和营养反弹较少。