Department of Communication, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Department of Communication Studies, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA.
Risk Anal. 2017 Jan;37(1):40-51. doi: 10.1111/risa.12600. Epub 2016 Mar 12.
Public dissemination of scientific research often focuses on the finding (e.g., nanobombs kill lung cancer) rather than the uncertainty/limitations (e.g., in mice). Adults (n = 880) participated in an experiment where they read a manipulated news report about cancer research (a) that contained either low or high uncertainty (b) that was attributed to the scientists responsible for the research (disclosure condition) or an unaffiliated scientist (dueling condition). Compared to the dueling condition, the disclosure condition triggered less prevention-focused cancer fatalism and nutritional backlash.
科学研究的公开传播通常侧重于研究结果(例如,纳米炸弹能杀死肺癌),而不是不确定性/局限性(例如,在老鼠身上)。880 名成年人参与了一项实验,他们阅读了一份关于癌症研究的操纵新闻报道(a),该报道包含低不确定性或高不确定性(b),并归因于负责研究的科学家(披露条件)或一个不相关的科学家(决斗条件)。与决斗条件相比,披露条件引发的预防为重点的癌症宿命论和营养反弹较少。