Hengartner M P, Ajdacic-Gross V, Wyss C, Angst J, Rössler W
Department of Applied Psychology,Zurich University of Applied Sciences,Zurich,Switzerland.
Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics,University of Zurich,Zurich,Switzerland.
Psychol Med. 2016 Jun;46(8):1693-705. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716000210. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
Mounting evidence supports the notion that personality is crucial in the aetiopathology of common mental disorders, but studies that allow for aetiological conclusions are lacking. The aim of the present study was thus to provide a test of the predisposition model.
We analysed data from the Zurich Cohort Study, a 30-year longitudinal epidemiological community study of an adult cohort (n = 591) from 1979 to 2008. Personality was assessed in 1988 with an established personality questionnaire, and psychopathology through seven semi-structured interviews between 1979 and 2008.
On the basis of personality assessment from 1988, used as predictor of subsequent psychopathology (1993-2008), while adjusting for sex and prior mental disorders (1979-1988), neuroticism related significantly with future major depression episodes [odds ratio (OR) = 1.41], anxiety disorders (OR = 1.32) and depression treatment use (OR = 1.41). When participants with a past 10-year history (i.e. 1979-1988) of either major depression, anxiety disorder or depression treatment use were excluded, neuroticism in 1988 still significantly predicted first incidence (i.e. 1993-2008) of major depression episodes (OR = 1.53) and depression treatment use (OR = 1.84).
The present study provides compelling evidence that the personality trait of neuroticism constitutes an independent risk factor for subsequent major depression episodes and use of respective professional treatments, which serves as a proxy for particularly severe and impairing depression episodes. We therefore advocate that personality traits could provide clinically useful prognostic information when considered carefully.
越来越多的证据支持人格在常见精神障碍的病因学中起关键作用这一观点,但缺乏能得出病因学结论的研究。因此,本研究的目的是对易感性模型进行检验。
我们分析了苏黎世队列研究的数据,这是一项对1979年至2008年的成年队列(n = 591)进行的为期30年的纵向流行病学社区研究。1988年使用既定的人格问卷对人格进行评估,并在1979年至2008年期间通过七次半结构化访谈对精神病理学进行评估。
以1988年的人格评估作为后续精神病理学(1993 - 2008年)的预测指标,在调整性别和既往精神障碍(1979 - 1988年)后,神经质与未来的重度抑郁发作[比值比(OR)= 1.41]、焦虑症(OR = 1.32)以及抑郁治疗的使用(OR = 1.41)显著相关。当排除有过去10年(即1979 - 1988年)重度抑郁、焦虑症或抑郁治疗使用史的参与者后,1988年的神经质仍然显著预测重度抑郁发作的首次发病(即1993 - 2008年)(OR = 1.53)以及抑郁治疗的使用(OR = 1.84)。
本研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明神经质人格特质是后续重度抑郁发作及相应专业治疗使用的独立危险因素,而专业治疗可作为特别严重且有损害的抑郁发作的替代指标。因此,我们主张在仔细考虑时,人格特质可为临床提供有用的预后信息。