Lucas Todd, Lumley Mark A, Flack John M, Wegner Rhiana, Pierce Jennifer, Goetz Stefan
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health Sciences, Wayne State University.
Department of Psychology, Wayne State University.
Health Psychol. 2016 Apr;35(4):366-75. doi: 10.1037/hea0000284.
According to worldview verification theory, inconsistencies between lived experiences and worldviews are psychologically threatening. These inconsistencies may be key determinants of stress processes that influence cardiovascular health disparities. This preliminary examination considers how experiencing injustice can affect perceived racism and biological stress reactivity among African Americans. Guided by worldview verification theory, it was hypothesized that responses to receiving an unfair outcome would be moderated by fairness of the accompanying decision process, and that this effect would further depend on the consistency of the decision process with preexisting justice beliefs.
A sample of 118 healthy African American adults completed baseline measures of justice beliefs, followed by a laboratory-based social-evaluative stressor task. Two randomized fairness manipulations were implemented during the task: participants were given either high or low levels of distributive (outcome) and procedural (decision process) justice. Glucocorticoid (cortisol) and inflammatory (C-reactive protein) biological responses were measured in oral fluids, and attributions of racism were also measured.
The hypothesized 3-way interaction was generally obtained. Among African Americans with a strong belief in justice, perceived racism, cortisol, and C-reactive protein responses to low distributive justice were higher when procedural justice was low. Among African Americans with a weak belief in justice however, these responses were higher when a low level of distributive justice was coupled with high procedural justice.
Biological and psychological processes that contribute to cardiovascular health disparities are affected by consistency between individual-level and contextual justice factors. (PsycINFO Database Record
根据世界观验证理论,生活经历与世界观之间的不一致在心理上具有威胁性。这些不一致可能是影响心血管健康差异的应激过程的关键决定因素。本初步研究探讨了经历不公正如何影响非裔美国人对种族主义的认知以及生物应激反应性。在世界观验证理论的指导下,研究假设对接受不公平结果的反应会受到伴随决策过程公平性的调节,并且这种效应将进一步取决于决策过程与先前存在的正义信念的一致性。
118名健康的非裔美国成年人样本完成了正义信念的基线测量,随后进行了一项基于实验室的社会评价应激源任务。在任务过程中实施了两种随机公平操纵:参与者被给予高或低水平的分配(结果)和程序(决策过程)正义。在口腔液中测量了糖皮质激素(皮质醇)和炎症(C反应蛋白)的生物反应,还测量了对种族主义的归因。
总体上获得了假设的三因素交互作用。在坚信正义的非裔美国人中,当程序正义较低时,对低分配正义的种族主义认知、皮质醇和C反应蛋白反应更高。然而,在正义信念较弱的非裔美国人中,当低水平的分配正义与高程序正义相结合时,这些反应更高。
导致心血管健康差异的生物和心理过程受到个体层面和情境正义因素之间一致性的影响。(PsycINFO数据库记录)