Suppr超能文献

金(I)和金(III)离子以及金纳米颗粒的抗菌活性和细胞毒性

Antibacterial Activity and Cytotoxicity of Gold (I) and (III) Ions and Gold Nanoparticles.

作者信息

Shareena Dasari T P, Zhang Y, Yu H

出版信息

Biochem Pharmacol (Los Angel). 2015 Dec;4(6). doi: 10.4172/2167-0501.1000199. Epub 2015 Dec 20.

Abstract

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and gold ion complexes have been investigated for their antibacterial activities. However, the majority of the reports failed to disclose the concentration of free Au(I) or Au(III) present in solutions of AuNPs or gold ion complexes. The inconsistency of antibacterial activity of AuNPs may be due to the effect of the presence of Au(III). Here we report the antibacterial activity of Au(I) and Au(III) to four different bacteria: one nonpathogenic bacterium: and three multidrug-resistant bacteria: , and . Au(I) and Au(III) as chloride are highly toxic to all the four bacteria, with IC of 0.35 - 0.49 µM for Au(III) and 0.27-0.52 µM for Au(I).The bacterial growth inhibition by both Au(I) and Au(III) increases with exposure time and is strongly affected by the use of buffers. The IC values for Au(I) and Au(III) in different buffers are HEPES (0.48 and 1.55 µM) > Trizma (0.41 and 0.57 µM) > PBS (0.14 and 0.06 µM). Bacterial growth inhibition by AuNPs is gradually reduced by centrifugation-resuspension to remove residual Au(III) ion present in the crude synthetic AuNPs. After 4 centrifugations-resuspensions, AuNPs become non-toxic. In addition, both Au(I) and Au(III) are cytotoxic to skin keratinocyte and blood lymphocyte cells. These results suggest that Au(I) and Au(III) in pure or complex forms may be explored as a method to treat drug-resistant bacteria, and the test of AuNPs toxicity must consider residual Au(III), exposure time, and the use of buffers.

摘要

金纳米颗粒(AuNPs)和金离子络合物的抗菌活性已得到研究。然而,大多数报告未能披露AuNPs溶液或金离子络合物中游离Au(I)或Au(III)的浓度。AuNPs抗菌活性的不一致可能是由于Au(III)存在的影响。在此,我们报告Au(I)和Au(III)对四种不同细菌的抗菌活性:一种非致病细菌: ,以及三种多重耐药细菌: 、 和 。以氯化物形式存在的Au(I)和Au(III)对所有四种细菌都具有高毒性,Au(III)的半数抑制浓度(IC)为0.35 - 0.49 µM,Au(I)为0.27 - 0.52 µM。Au(I)和Au(III)对细菌生长的抑制作用均随暴露时间增加,并且受到缓冲液使用的强烈影响。在不同缓冲液中,Au(I)和Au(III)的IC值为:HEPES(0.48和1.55 µM)> Trizma(0.41和0.57 µM)> PBS(0.14和0.06 µM)。通过离心重悬以去除粗制合成AuNPs中存在的残留Au(III)离子,可逐渐降低AuNPs对细菌生长的抑制作用。经过4次离心重悬后,AuNPs变得无毒。此外,Au(I)和Au(III)对皮肤角质形成细胞和血液淋巴细胞均具有细胞毒性。这些结果表明,纯形式或络合形式的Au(I)和Au(III)可作为治疗耐药细菌的一种方法进行探索,并且AuNPs毒性测试必须考虑残留Au(III)、暴露时间和缓冲液的使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cf7/4807878/f6ed3e46dbb5/nihms757110f1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验