Pepper J K, Ribisl K M, Brewer N T
Department of Health Behavior, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2016 Nov;25(Suppl 2):ii62-ii66. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053174. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
More US adolescents use e-cigarettes than smoke cigarettes. Research suggests flavoured e-cigarettes appeal to youth, but little is known about perceptions of and reasons for attraction to specific flavours.
A national sample of adolescents (n=1125) ages 13-17 participated in a phone survey from November 2014 to June 2015. We randomly assigned adolescents to respond to survey items about 1 of 5 e-cigarette flavours (tobacco, alcohol, menthol, candy or fruit) and used regression analysis to examine the impact of flavour on interest in trying e-cigarettes and harm beliefs.
Adolescents were more likely to report interest in trying an e-cigarette offered by a friend if it were flavoured like menthol (OR=4.00, 95% CI 1.46 to 10.97), candy (OR=4.53, 95% CI 1.67 to 12.31) or fruit (OR=6.49, 95% CI 2.48 to 17.01) compared with tobacco. Adolescents believed that fruit-flavoured e-cigarettes were less harmful to health than tobacco-flavoured e-cigarettes (p<0.05). Perceived harm mediated the relationship between some flavours and interest in trying e-cigarettes. A minority of adolescents believed that e-cigarettes did not have nicotine (14.6%) or did not know whether they had nicotine (3.6%); these beliefs did not vary by flavour.
Candy-flavoured, fruit-flavoured and menthol-flavoured e-cigarettes appeal to adolescents more than tobacco-flavoured or alcohol-flavoured e-cigarettes. This appeal is only partially explained by beliefs about reduced harm. Given adolescents' interest in trying e-cigarettes with certain flavours, policymakers should consider restricting advertisements promoting flavoured products in media that reach large numbers of young people. Future research should examine other reasons for the appeal of individual flavours, such as novelty and perceived luxury.
在美国,使用电子烟的青少年比吸烟的青少年更多。研究表明,有口味的电子烟对年轻人有吸引力,但对于特定口味的电子烟的认知以及产生吸引力的原因却知之甚少。
2014年11月至2015年6月,对13至17岁的青少年进行了一项全国性抽样电话调查(n = 1125)。我们随机分配青少年回答有关5种电子烟口味(烟草味、酒精味、薄荷味、糖果味或水果味)中一种的调查项目,并使用回归分析来检验口味对尝试电子烟的兴趣和危害认知的影响。
与烟草味电子烟相比,如果朋友提供的是薄荷味(比值比[OR]=4.00,95%置信区间[CI]为1.46至10.97)、糖果味(OR = 4.53,95% CI为1.67至12.31)或水果味(OR = 6.49,95% CI为2.48至17.01)的电子烟,青少年更有可能表示有兴趣尝试。青少年认为水果味电子烟对健康的危害比烟草味电子烟小(p<0.05)。感知到的危害在某些口味与尝试电子烟的兴趣之间起中介作用。少数青少年认为电子烟不含尼古丁(14.6%)或不知道电子烟是否含尼古丁(3.6%);这些认知在不同口味之间没有差异。
糖果味、水果味和薄荷味的电子烟比烟草味或酒精味的电子烟更吸引青少年。这种吸引力仅部分地由对危害降低的认知来解释。鉴于青少年对尝试某些口味电子烟的兴趣,政策制定者应考虑限制在面向大量年轻人的媒体中宣传有口味产品的广告。未来的研究应探究个别口味具有吸引力的其他原因,如新奇感和感知到的奢华感。