• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Lack of Evidence Supporting the Effectiveness of Disaster Supply Kits.缺乏支持应急物资储备有效性的证据。
Am J Public Health. 2016 Jun;106(6):979-82. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303148. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
Emergency Food Supplies in Food Secure Households.粮食安全家庭中的应急食品供应
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2015 Aug;30(4):359-64. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X15004884. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
3
Contents of a Bug-Out Bag.应急包的物品清单。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Dec;33(6):647-649. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X18000948. Epub 2018 Nov 5.
4
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS: ARE YOU READY?灾难准备:你准备好了吗?
Diabetes Self Manag. 2016 Jul-Aug;33(4):22-5, 30-1.
5
Low Compliance of Urgent Care Centers in the United States With Recommendations for Office-Based Disaster Preparedness.美国紧急护理中心对基于办公室的灾难准备建议的依从性较低。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 May;32(5):298-302. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000701.
6
Disaster preparedness lessons learned and future directions for education: results from focus groups conducted at the 2006 APIC Conference.灾难防范的经验教训及未来教育方向:2006年美国感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会会议焦点小组的结果
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Aug;35(6):374-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.09.002.
7
Household Emergency Preparedness Instrument Development: A Delphi Study.家庭应急准备工具开发:德尔菲研究。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Apr;16(2):570-582. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.292. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
8
Hazardous materials. Disaster medical planning and response.危险材料。灾难医疗规划与应对。
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 1996 May;14(2):327-48. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70254-6.
9
Exploring the impact, response and preparedness to water-related natural disasters in the Barisal division of Bangladesh: a mixed methods study.探索孟加拉国巴里萨尔地区与水有关的自然灾害的影响、应对和准备情况:一项混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 4;9(4):e026459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026459.
10
Factors affecting household disaster preparedness in South Korea.影响韩国家庭灾害准备的因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 4;17(10):e0275540. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275540. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Addressing the impact of forest fires in Quito on youth health.应对基多森林火灾对青少年健康的影响。
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 21;13:1532865. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1532865. eCollection 2025.
2
Disaster preparedness kits ready or not? Household resilience to flash flooding in Uttarakhand.备灾包准备好了吗?北阿坎德邦家庭对山洪暴发的抵御能力。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 26;11(1):e41446. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41446. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.
3
Nurses Taking on Readiness Measures (N-TORM): A nurse-facilitated household emergency preparedness intervention feasibility study.护士参与准备措施(N-TORM):一项由护士推动的家庭应急准备干预可行性研究。
Health Emerg Disaster Nurs. 2024 Mar 22;11(1):53-65. doi: 10.24298/hedn.2022-0009. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Understanding Mothers' Worries about the Effects of Disaster Evacuation on Their Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.理解母亲们对灾难疏散对其子女影响的担忧:一项横断面研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 19;20(3):1850. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031850.
5
Factors Associated with Knowledge of Evacuation Routes and Having an Emergency Backpack in Individuals Affected by a Major Earthquake in Piura, Peru.与皮乌拉秘鲁大地震受灾者的疏散路线知识和应急背包有关的因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 9;19(22):14686. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192214686.
6
Preparedness, Hurricanes Irma and Maria, and Impact on Health in Puerto Rico.应急准备、飓风“厄玛”和“玛丽亚”以及对波多黎各健康的影响
Int J Disaster Risk Reduct. 2022 Jan;67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102657. Epub 2021 Oct 28.
7
Association of US Households' Disaster Preparedness With Socioeconomic Characteristics, Composition, and Region.美国家庭的灾难准备情况与社会经济特征、构成和地区有关。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Apr 1;3(4):e206881. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6881.
8
Scientific evidence on natural disasters and health emergency and disaster risk management in Asian rural-based area.亚洲农村地区自然灾害与卫生应急及灾害风险管理的科学证据。
Br Med Bull. 2019 Mar 1;129(1):91-105. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldz002.
9
The Promotion of 'Grab Bags' as a Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.推广“福袋”作为一种减少灾害风险的策略。
PLoS Curr. 2018 Jul 6;10:ecurrents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8. doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.223ac4322834aa0bb0d6824ee424e7f8.
10
Residents' Disaster Preparedness after the Meinong Taiwan Earthquake: A Test of Protection Motivation Theory.美浓地震后居民的备灾准备:保护动机理论的检验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 7;15(7):1434. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071434.

本文引用的文献

1
A mixed-methods pilot study of disaster preparedness and resiliency among faith-based organizations.基于信仰的组织灾难准备和恢复能力的混合方法试点研究。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014 Apr;29(2):127-33. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X14000120. Epub 2014 Feb 21.
2
The effects of the April 2011 tornado outbreak on personal preparedness in Jefferson County, Alabama.2011年4月龙卷风爆发对阿拉巴马州杰斐逊县个人应急准备的影响。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):424-31. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3182a45104.
3
Preparedness for natural disasters among older US adults: a nationwide survey.美国老年人应对自然灾害的准备情况:一项全国性调查。
Am J Public Health. 2014 Mar;104(3):506-11. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301559. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
4
Applying community engagement to disaster planning: developing the vision and design for the Los Angeles County Community Disaster Resilience initiative.将社区参与应用于灾害规划:制定洛杉矶县社区灾害恢复力倡议的愿景和设计。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jul;103(7):1172-80. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2013.301407. Epub 2013 May 16.
5
Measuring levels of citizen public health emergency preparedness, Jefferson County, Alabama.测量阿拉巴马州杰斐逊县公民公共卫生应急准备水平。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 May-Jun;19(3):266-73. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e318264ed8c.
6
Social capital and disaster preparedness among low income Mexican Americans in a disaster prone area.社会资本与灾害多发区贫困墨西哥裔美国人的备灾意识。
Soc Sci Med. 2013 Apr;83:50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.037. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
7
Disaster preparedness and families of children with special needs: a geographic comparison.灾难准备与有特殊需要儿童的家庭:地理比较。
J Community Health. 2013 Feb;38(1):106-12. doi: 10.1007/s10900-012-9587-3.
8
The protective action decision model: theoretical modifications and additional evidence.保护行动决策模型:理论修正与额外证据。
Risk Anal. 2012 Apr;32(4):616-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01647.x. Epub 2011 Jun 20.
9
Disaster preparedness among medically vulnerable populations.医学弱势群体的灾难准备。
Am J Prev Med. 2011 Feb;40(2):139-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.020.
10
Factors predicting individual emergency preparedness: a multi-state analysis of 2006 BRFSS data.预测个人应急准备情况的因素:对2006年美国国家健康访问调查数据的多州分析
Biosecur Bioterror. 2009 Sep;7(3):317-30. doi: 10.1089/bsp.2009.0022.

缺乏支持应急物资储备有效性的证据。

Lack of Evidence Supporting the Effectiveness of Disaster Supply Kits.

作者信息

Heagele Tara N

机构信息

Tara N. Heagele is with the School of Nursing, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, and the Specialty Care Transport Unit, Exceptional Medical Transportation, West Berlin, NJ.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2016 Jun;106(6):979-82. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303148. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

DOI:10.2105/AJPH.2016.303148
PMID:27077362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4880243/
Abstract

We reviewed the available evidence in support of the effectiveness of disaster supply kits presently used in household emergency preparedness in the United States. The expectation that people should take responsibility for their own disaster preparedness has largely not taken into account contextual influences on disaster preparedness. The efficiency of current disaster supply kits used during critical postdisaster periods has not been empirically tested. Professional recommendations regarding the composition of disaster supply kits containing at least water, food, first aid, hygiene, and clothing have not been universally defined. This lack of consensus may lead to the assembling of disaster supply kits yielding suboptimal results. The use of disaster supply kits should continue to be nationally recommended, although additional research is needed to demonstrate their beneficial impact on survival and resilience after a disaster.

摘要

我们回顾了现有证据,以支持目前美国用于家庭应急准备的灾难应急包的有效性。人们应该为自己的灾难准备负责这一期望,在很大程度上没有考虑到影响灾难准备的背景因素。当前在灾后关键时期使用的灾难应急包的效率尚未经过实证检验。关于灾难应急包组成的专业建议,即至少包含水、食物、急救用品、卫生用品和衣物,尚未得到统一界定。这种缺乏共识的情况可能导致组装的灾难应急包效果欠佳。尽管需要更多研究来证明灾难应急包对灾难后生存和恢复力的有益影响,但在全国范围内仍应继续推荐使用灾难应急包。