Suppr超能文献

丧亲服务结果的范围综述。

A scoping review of bereavement service outcomes.

作者信息

Wilson Donna M, Dhanji Nurin, Playfair Robyn, Nayak Sahana Srinivas, Puplampu Gideon L, Macleod Rod

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing,University of Alberta,Edmonton,Alberta,Canada.

HammondCare and Department of Palliative Care,University of Sydney,Sydney,New South Wales,Australia.

出版信息

Palliat Support Care. 2017 Apr;15(2):242-259. doi: 10.1017/S147895151600047X. Epub 2016 Jun 29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This scoping literature review, through finding and assessing researched bereavement service outcomes, sought to determine the state of bereavement services evaluation, to catalogue service types, and to identify which service or services, if any, demonstrate clear evidence of effectiveness.

METHOD

Our methods included: (1) a literature search for published English-language research articles from 2005-2015; (2) critical appraisal of articles to identify findings; (3) compilation of findings; and (4) determination of the relevance of our findings.

RESULTS

Some 38 papers were found, and all were retained to identify the outcomes researched and research findings. Many different outcomes were studied in the 18 quantitative, 11 qualitative, and 9 mixed-methods investigations undertaken worldwide. Ten studies focused on level of grief, six on stress/distress level, six on grief knowledge, six on level of depression, and five on somatization or physical symptoms. Most commonly, a group of bereavement services was evaluated as a whole, followed by group therapy, individual counseling, written information, and other less common services. No group of services or individual service was determined to yield clear and convincing evidence of effectiveness. Regardless, all but one service were shown to have value-most often related to gaining grief information and/or emotional support. Until high-quality research studies have repeatedly revealed evidence of effectiveness, it is possible that the positive outcomes of bereavement services will be largely based on bereaved people receiving helpful educational information and emotional support from organizations and people prepared to help them.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This project outlines existing bereavement service types and the state of science in relation to determination of outcomes. It offers suggestions to advance the state of science to validate or refine bereavement services. It brings to light the issue that bereavement service outcomes need to be carefully researched so that evidence can drive service refinement and expansion. It also highlights the importance of effective bereavement services.

摘要

目的

本综述性文献研究旨在通过查找和评估有关丧亲服务结果的研究,确定丧亲服务评估的现状,梳理服务类型,并确定哪些服务(如有)有明确的有效性证据。

方法

我们的方法包括:(1)检索2005年至2015年发表的英文研究文章;(2)对文章进行批判性评估以确定研究结果;(3)汇总研究结果;(4)确定我们的研究结果的相关性。

结果

共找到约38篇论文,所有论文均被保留以确定所研究的结果和研究发现。在全球范围内进行的18项定量研究、11项定性研究和9项混合方法研究中,研究了许多不同的结果。十项研究关注悲伤程度,六项关注压力/痛苦程度,六项关注悲伤知识,六项关注抑郁程度,五项关注躯体化或身体症状。最常见的是,一组丧亲服务被作为一个整体进行评估,其次是团体治疗、个体咨询、书面信息以及其他不太常见的服务。没有一组服务或单项服务被确定产生明确且令人信服的有效性证据。尽管如此,除一项服务外,所有服务都显示出有价值——最常见的是与获取悲伤信息和/或情感支持有关。在高质量的研究反复揭示有效性证据之前,丧亲服务的积极结果可能很大程度上基于丧亲者从愿意提供帮助的组织和人员那里获得有用的教育信息和情感支持。

结果的意义

本项目概述了现有的丧亲服务类型以及与结果确定相关的科学现状。它为推进科学以验证或完善丧亲服务提供了建议。它揭示了丧亲服务结果需要仔细研究以便证据能够推动服务改进和扩展这一问题。它还强调了有效丧亲服务的重要性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验