• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当地鸟类密度会影响因撞击窗户而死亡的风险。

Local avian density influences risk of mortality from window strikes.

作者信息

Sabo Ann M, Hagemeyer Natasha D G, Lahey Ally S, Walters Eric L

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Old Dominion University , Norfolk, Virginia , United States.

出版信息

PeerJ. 2016 Jun 23;4:e2170. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2170. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.7717/peerj.2170
PMID:27366656
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4924123/
Abstract

Up to a billion birds die per year in North America as a result of striking windows. Both transparent and reflective glass panes are a cause for concern, misleading birds by either acting as invisible, impenetrable barriers to desired resources, or reflecting those resources over a large surface area. A high number of window strikes occur during migration, but little is known about the factors of susceptibility, or whether particular avian taxa are more vulnerable than others. We report on a study of window strikes and mist-netting data at the Virginia Zoological Park (Norfolk, Virginia, USA), conducted in the autumn of 2013 and 2014. We focused on three factors likely to contribute to an individual's predisposition to collide with windows: (i) taxonomic classification, (ii) age, and (iii) migrant vs. resident status. Thrushes, dominated by the partial migrant American Robin (Turdus migratorius), were significantly less likely to strike glass than be sampled in mist nets (χ(2) = 9.21, p = 0.002), while wood-warblers (Parulidae) were more likely to strike than expected (χ(2) = 13.55, p < 0.001). The proportion of juveniles striking windows (45.4%) was not significantly different (χ(2) = 0.05, p = 0.827) than the population of juvenile birds naturally occurring at the zoo (48.8%). Migrants, however, were significantly more susceptible to window strikes than residents (χ(2) = 6.35, p = 0.012). Our results suggest that resident birds are able to learn to avoid and thus reduce their likelihood of striking windows; this intrinsic risk factor may help explain the apparent susceptibility of certain taxa to window strikes.

摘要

在北美,每年有多达10亿只鸟因撞击窗户而死亡。透明和反光的玻璃窗都是令人担忧的原因,它们要么作为对所需资源不可见、无法穿透的屏障误导鸟类,要么在大面积上反射这些资源。大量的窗户撞击事件发生在鸟类迁徙期间,但对于易感性因素,或者特定鸟类分类群是否比其他鸟类更易受影响,我们知之甚少。我们报告了一项于2013年秋季和2014年在美国弗吉尼亚州诺福克市弗吉尼亚动物园进行的关于窗户撞击和雾网捕获数据的研究。我们关注了可能导致个体倾向于与窗户碰撞的三个因素:(i)分类学分类,(ii)年龄,以及(iii)候鸟与留鸟状态。以部分候鸟美洲知更鸟(旅鸫)为主的鸫科鸟类撞击玻璃的可能性明显低于在雾网中被捕获的可能性(χ(2)=9.21,p = 0.002),而林莺科鸟类撞击的可能性高于预期(χ(2)=13.55,p < 0.001)。撞击窗户的幼鸟比例(45.4%)与动物园自然出现的幼鸟种群比例(48.8%)没有显著差异(χ(2)=0.05,p = 0.827)。然而,候鸟比留鸟更容易受到窗户撞击(χ(2)=6.35,p = 0.012)。我们的结果表明,留鸟能够学会避开从而降低撞击窗户的可能性;这种内在风险因素可能有助于解释某些分类群对窗户撞击的明显易感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/289f/4924123/fa4cbe408b61/peerj-04-2170-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/289f/4924123/a590dba148c8/peerj-04-2170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/289f/4924123/fa4cbe408b61/peerj-04-2170-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/289f/4924123/a590dba148c8/peerj-04-2170-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/289f/4924123/fa4cbe408b61/peerj-04-2170-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Local avian density influences risk of mortality from window strikes.当地鸟类密度会影响因撞击窗户而死亡的风险。
PeerJ. 2016 Jun 23;4:e2170. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2170. eCollection 2016.
2
Bird-Window Collisions at a West-Coast Urban Park Museum: Analyses of Bird Biology and Window Attributes from Golden Gate Park, San Francisco.西海岸城市公园博物馆中的鸟类与窗户碰撞事件:对旧金山金门公园鸟类生物学和窗户属性的分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0144600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144600. eCollection 2016.
3
Bird-Window Collisions: A Critical Animal Welfare and Conservation Issue.鸟类与窗户碰撞:一个关键的动物福利和保护问题。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1:S11-7. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075832.
4
Bird-window collisions in the summer breeding season.夏季繁殖期的鸟撞窗事件。
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 26;2:e460. doi: 10.7717/peerj.460. eCollection 2014.
5
Bird-window collisions: different fall and winter risk and protective factors.鸟类与窗户碰撞:秋冬季节不同的风险及保护因素
PeerJ. 2020 Jun 19;8:e9401. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9401. eCollection 2020.
6
Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges.冬季鸟类与窗户碰撞:缓解成效、风险因素及实施挑战
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 2;7:e7620. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7620. eCollection 2019.
7
Ultraviolet-reflective film applied to windows reduces the likelihood of collisions for two species of songbird.贴在窗户上的紫外线反射膜降低了两种鸣禽碰撞的可能性。
PeerJ. 2020 Sep 16;8:e9926. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9926. eCollection 2020.
8
Main causes of bird-window collisions: a review.鸟类与窗户碰撞的主要原因:综述
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2020 Mar 16;92(1):e20180745. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765202020180745. eCollection 2020.
9
Bird protection treatments reduce bird-window collision risk at low-rise buildings within a Pacific coastal protected area.鸟类保护措施降低了太平洋沿海保护区内低层建筑的鸟类撞窗风险。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 22;10:e13142. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13142. eCollection 2022.
10
Year-round monitoring reveals prevalence of fatal bird-window collisions at the Virginia Tech Corporate Research Center.全年监测揭示了弗吉尼亚理工大学企业研究中心致命鸟类与窗户碰撞事件的发生率。
PeerJ. 2018 Apr 4;6:e4562. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4562. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Rehabilitation outcomes of bird-building collision victims in the Northeastern United States.美国东北部因筑巢而与鸟相撞的受害者的康复结果。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 7;19(8):e0306362. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306362. eCollection 2024.
2
What causes bird-building collision risk? Seasonal dynamics and weather drivers.是什么导致鸟类与建筑物碰撞的风险?季节性动态和天气因素。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Apr 7;13(4):e9974. doi: 10.1002/ece3.9974. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Opening the black box of bird-window collisions: passive video recordings in a residential backyard.

本文引用的文献

1
Patterns of bird-window collisions inform mitigation on a university campus.鸟类与窗户碰撞的模式为大学校园的缓解措施提供了依据。
PeerJ. 2016 Feb 1;4:e1652. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1652. eCollection 2016.
2
Bird-Window Collisions at a West-Coast Urban Park Museum: Analyses of Bird Biology and Window Attributes from Golden Gate Park, San Francisco.西海岸城市公园博物馆中的鸟类与窗户碰撞事件:对旧金山金门公园鸟类生物学和窗户属性的分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0144600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144600. eCollection 2016.
3
Bird-Window Collisions: A Critical Animal Welfare and Conservation Issue.
揭开鸟撞玻璃之“黑箱”:住家后院被动式视频记录
PeerJ. 2022 Dec 20;10:e14604. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14604. eCollection 2022.
4
Multi-scale temporal variation in bird-window collisions in the central United States.美国中部鸟类与窗户碰撞的多尺度时间变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89875-0.
5
Drivers of bird-window collisions in southern South America: a two-scale assessment applying citizen science.南南美的鸟撞窗驱动因素:应用公民科学的两尺度评估。
Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 3;9(1):18148. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54351-3.
6
Factors influencing bird-building collisions in the downtown area of a major North American city.影响北美主要城市市中心鸟类筑巢碰撞的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0224164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224164. eCollection 2019.
7
Geo-referencing bird-window collisions for targeted mitigation.对鸟类与窗户碰撞事件进行地理定位以实施有针对性的缓解措施。
PeerJ. 2018 Jan 4;6:e4215. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4215. eCollection 2018.
8
Magnitude and correlates of bird collisions at glass bus shelters in an urban landscape.城市景观中玻璃公交候车亭鸟类碰撞的规模及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178667. eCollection 2017.
鸟类与窗户碰撞:一个关键的动物福利和保护问题。
J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2015;18 Suppl 1:S11-7. doi: 10.1080/10888705.2015.1075832.
4
Bird-window collisions in the summer breeding season.夏季繁殖期的鸟撞窗事件。
PeerJ. 2014 Jun 26;2:e460. doi: 10.7717/peerj.460. eCollection 2014.
5
Window area and development drive spatial variation in bird-window collisions in an urban landscape.窗户面积和发展驱动城市景观中鸟类与窗户碰撞的空间变化。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53371. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0053371. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
6
An estimate of avian mortality at communication towers in the United States and Canada.美国和加拿大通讯塔上鸟类死亡率的估算。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e34025. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034025. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
7
Collision mortality has no discernible effect on population trends of North American birds.碰撞死亡率对北美的鸟类种群趋势没有明显影响。
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e24708. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024708. Epub 2011 Sep 9.
8
The role of visual landmarks in the avian familiar area map.视觉地标在鸟类熟悉区域地图中的作用。
J Exp Biol. 2003 Jun;206(Pt 11):1773-8. doi: 10.1242/jeb.00365.
9
Way-finding and landmarks: the multiple-bearings hypothesis.寻路与地标:多重方位假说
J Exp Biol. 2001 Jan;204(Pt 1):103-13. doi: 10.1242/jeb.204.1.103.