• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童柏林情感词汇表(kidBAWL):探索视觉和听觉模态下情感词汇语义的加工过程。

The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities.

作者信息

Sylvester Teresa, Braun Mario, Schmidtke David, Jacobs Arthur M

机构信息

Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin Berlin, Germany.

Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Universität Salzburg Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969
PMID:27445930
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4928334/
Abstract

While research on affective word processing in adults witnesses increasing interest, the present paper looks at another group of participants that have been neglected so far: pupils (age range: 6-12 years). Introducing a variant of the Berlin Affective Wordlist (BAWL) especially adapted for children of that age group, the "kidBAWL," we examined to what extent pupils process affective lexical semantics similarly to adults. In three experiments using rating and valence decision tasks in both the visual and auditory modality, it was established that children show the two ubiquitous phenomena observed in adults with emotional word material: the asymmetric U-shaped function relating valence to arousal ratings, and the inversely U-shaped function relating response times to valence decision latencies. The results for both modalities show large structural similarities between pupil and adult data (taken from previous studies) indicating that in the present age range, the affective lexicon and the dynamic interplay between language and emotion is already well-developed. Differential effects show that younger children tend to choose less extreme ratings than older children and that rating latencies decrease with age. Overall, our study should help to develop more realistic models of word recognition and reading that include affective processes and offer a methodology for exploring the roots of pleasant literary experiences and ludic reading.

摘要

虽然针对成年人情感词汇加工的研究越来越受到关注,但本文关注的是另一组迄今为止被忽视的参与者:小学生(年龄范围:6至12岁)。我们引入了特别为该年龄组儿童改编的柏林情感词表(BAWL)的变体“儿童BAWL”,研究了小学生在多大程度上与成年人以相似的方式加工情感词汇语义。在三个使用视觉和听觉模态的评级和效价判断任务的实验中,我们证实了儿童在处理情感词汇材料时表现出了在成年人中观察到的两种普遍现象:效价与唤醒评级之间的不对称U形函数,以及反应时间与效价判断潜伏期之间的倒U形函数。两种模态的结果都显示出小学生和成年人数据(取自先前研究)之间存在很大的结构相似性,这表明在当前年龄范围内,情感词汇以及语言与情感之间的动态相互作用已经发展得很好。差异效应表明,年幼的孩子倾向于选择比年长的孩子更不极端的评级,并且评级潜伏期随着年龄的增长而缩短。总的来说,我们的研究应有助于开发更现实的单词识别和阅读模型,其中包括情感过程,并为探索愉悦文学体验和趣味性阅读的根源提供一种方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/632232388faa/fpsyg-07-00969-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/22dcf912ebbe/fpsyg-07-00969-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/48ba3f6d7d8f/fpsyg-07-00969-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/857ce85de876/fpsyg-07-00969-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/2135aff3c13b/fpsyg-07-00969-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/632232388faa/fpsyg-07-00969-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/22dcf912ebbe/fpsyg-07-00969-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/48ba3f6d7d8f/fpsyg-07-00969-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/857ce85de876/fpsyg-07-00969-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/2135aff3c13b/fpsyg-07-00969-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a74/4928334/632232388faa/fpsyg-07-00969-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities.儿童柏林情感词汇表(kidBAWL):探索视觉和听觉模态下情感词汇语义的加工过程。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969. eCollection 2016.
2
Affective valence of words differentially affects visual and auditory word recognition.词语的情感效价会对视觉和听觉词汇识别产生差异影响。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Sep;151(9):2144-2159. doi: 10.1037/xge0001176. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
3
Discrete emotion norms for nouns: Berlin affective word list (DENN-BAWL).名词的离散情感规范:柏林情感词列表(DENN-BAWL)。
Behav Res Methods. 2011 Jun;43(2):441-8. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0059-y.
4
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.
5
The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R).《柏林情感词汇表升级版》(BAWL-R)
Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):534-8. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.2.534.
6
Nencki Affective Word List (NAWL): the cultural adaptation of the Berlin Affective Word List-Reloaded (BAWL-R) for Polish.恩茨基情感词汇表(NAWL):柏林情感词汇表升级版(BAWL-R)的波兰语文化适应性版本。
Behav Res Methods. 2015 Dec;47(4):1222-1236. doi: 10.3758/s13428-014-0552-1.
7
The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter--an fMRI study.阅读《哈利·波特》中单词和段落的情感潜能——一项功能磁共振成像研究
Brain Lang. 2015 Mar;142:96-114. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
8
Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人词汇判断中情感贡献的神经相关物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1.
9
Reproducing affective norms with lexical co-occurrence statistics: Predicting valence, arousal, and dominance.利用词汇共现统计重现情感规范:预测效价、唤醒度和支配性。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2015;68(8):1584-98. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.941296. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
10
Affective Norms for Italian Words in Older Adults: Age Differences in Ratings of Valence, Arousal and Dominance.老年人意大利语词汇的情感规范:效价、唤醒和支配评级中的年龄差异
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 3;12(1):e0169472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169472. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of individual differences in emotional word recognition: Insights from a large-scale lexical decision study.个体差异在情绪词汇识别中的作用:来自大规模词汇判断研究的启示。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8501-8520. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02488-z. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
2
Subjective age of acquisition norms for 1604 English words by Spanish L2 speakers of English and their relationship with lexico-semantic, affective, sociolinguistic and proficiency variables.西班牙语母语者习得 1604 个英语单词的主观年龄规范及其与词汇语义、情感、社会语言学和熟练程度变量的关系。
Behav Res Methods. 2023 Dec;55(8):4437-4454. doi: 10.3758/s13428-022-02026-9. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Mixing positive and negative valence: Affective-semantic integration of bivalent words.混合正价与负价:二价词的情感语义整合
Sci Rep. 2016 Aug 5;6:30718. doi: 10.1038/srep30718.
2
Individual differences in emotion word processing: A diffusion model analysis.情绪词加工的个体差异:一种扩散模型分析。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jun;16(3):489-501. doi: 10.3758/s13415-016-0408-5.
3
Neural representation of emotion regulation goals.情绪调节目标的神经表征
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.
读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
4
Micropoetry Meets Neurocognitive Poetics: Influence of Associations on the Reception of Poetry.微观诗歌与神经认知诗学:联想对诗歌接受的影响
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 20;12:737756. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.737756. eCollection 2021.
5
Neuroimaging of valence decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人情绪决策的神经影像学研究。
Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Apr;48:100925. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2021.100925. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Neural correlates of affective contributions to lexical decisions in children and adults.儿童和成人词汇判断中情感贡献的神经相关物。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):945. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80359-1.
7
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?儿童与青少年文学的情感分析:是否存在波莉安娜效应?
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:574746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. eCollection 2020.
8
The Role of Emotional Valence for the Processing of Facial and Verbal Stimuli-Positivity or Negativity Bias?情绪效价在面部和言语刺激加工中的作用——积极偏向还是消极偏向?
Front Psychol. 2019 Jul 26;10:1654. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01654. eCollection 2019.
9
Auditory Emotion Word Primes Influence Emotional Face Categorization in Children and Adults, but Not Vice Versa.听觉情绪词启动会影响儿童和成人对情绪化面孔的分类,但反之则不然。
Front Psychol. 2018 May 1;9:618. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00618. eCollection 2018.
10
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Feb;37(2):600-20. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23053. Epub 2015 Nov 5.
4
The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives?简单句的情感潜能:名词和形容词的累加效应还是交互效应?
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137. eCollection 2015.
5
Cognitive Conceptualism-Where Have All the Affects Gone? Additional Corrections for Barrett et al. (2007).认知概念主义——所有情感都去了哪里?对 Barrett 等人(2007)的补充修正。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jul;3(4):305-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00081.x.
6
10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?十年来对阅读中情感与审美过程的大声疾呼:有哪些反响?
Front Psychol. 2015 Jun 3;6:714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00714. eCollection 2015.
7
On the role of language from basic to cultural modulation of affect: Comment on "The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model" by S. Koelsch et al.论语言在情感从基础调节到文化调节中的作用:评S. 科尔斯奇等人的《人类情感四重奏理论:一种整合性神经功能模型》
Phys Life Rev. 2015 Jun;13:40-2. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Neurocognitive poetics: methods and models for investigating the neuronal and cognitive-affective bases of literature reception.神经认知诗学:研究文学接受的神经元和认知情感基础的方法和模型。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 16;9:186. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00186. eCollection 2015.
9
"Anything is good that stimulates thought" in the hippocampus: Comment on "The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model" by S. Koelsch et al.海马体中“任何激发思考的事物都是有益的”:对S. 科尔斯奇等人所著《人类情绪的四重奏理论:一种整合性神经功能模型》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2015 Jun;13:58-60. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.007. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
10
Emotion and language - When and how comes emotion into words?: Comment on "The quartet theory of human emotions: An integrative and neurofunctional model" by S. Koelsch et al.情感与语言——情感何时以及如何融入言语之中?:对S. 科尔施等人所著《人类情感的四重奏理论:一种综合神经功能模型》的评论
Phys Life Rev. 2015 Jun;13:36-7. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2015.04.006. Epub 2015 Apr 14.