• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童与青少年文学的情感分析:是否存在波莉安娜效应?

Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?

作者信息

Jacobs Arthur M, Herrmann Berenike, Lauer Gerhard, Lüdtke Jana, Schroeder Sascha

机构信息

Department of Experimental and Neurocognitive Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Center for Cognitive Neuroscience Berlin (CCNB), Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:574746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746
PMID:33071913
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7541694/
Abstract

If the words of natural human language possess a universal positivity bias, as assumed by Boucher and Osgood's (1969) famous Pollyanna hypothesis and computationally confirmed for large text corpora in several languages (Dodds et al., 2015), then children and youth literature (CYL) should also show a Pollyanna effect. Here we tested this prediction applying an unsupervised vector space model-based sentiment analysis tool called (Jacobs, 2019) to two CYL corpora, one in English (372 books) and one in German (500 books). Pitching our analysis at the sentence level, and assessing semantic as well as lexico-grammatical information, both corpora show the Pollyanna effect and thus add further evidence to the universality hypothesis. The results of our multivariate sentiment analyses provide interesting testable predictions for future scientific studies of literature.

摘要

如果正如布彻和奥斯古德(1969)著名的“波莉安娜假说”所假设的那样,自然人类语言的词汇具有普遍的积极偏向,并且已通过计算在多种语言的大型文本语料库中得到证实(多兹等人,2015),那么儿童和青少年文学(CYL)也应该表现出“波莉安娜效应”。在此,我们通过一种名为(雅各布斯,2019)的基于无监督向量空间模型的情感分析工具,对两个儿童和青少年文学语料库进行了测试,一个是英文语料库(372本书),另一个是德语文语料库(500本书)。我们将分析定位在句子层面,并评估语义以及词汇语法信息,两个语料库均显示出“波莉安娜效应”,从而为普遍性假说增添了进一步的证据。我们的多变量情感分析结果为未来文学的科学研究提供了有趣的可测试预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/3fda29479da6/fpsyg-11-574746-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/37908bec2a9c/fpsyg-11-574746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/b8faeef95380/fpsyg-11-574746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/3fda29479da6/fpsyg-11-574746-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/37908bec2a9c/fpsyg-11-574746-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/b8faeef95380/fpsyg-11-574746-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ef76/7541694/3fda29479da6/fpsyg-11-574746-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Sentiment Analysis of Children and Youth Literature: Is There a Pollyanna Effect?儿童与青少年文学的情感分析:是否存在波莉安娜效应?
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 24;11:574746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.574746. eCollection 2020.
2
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.从计算(神经)诗学视角看词语与虚构人物的情感分析
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 17;6:53. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. eCollection 2019.
3
Does Pollyanna hypothesis hold true in death narratives? A sentiment analysis approach.“波利安娜假说”在死亡叙事中成立吗?一种情感分析方法。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 May;245:104238. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104238. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
4
Neural dynamics of sentiment processing during naturalistic sentence reading.自然阅读句子时情绪处理的神经动力学。
Neuroimage. 2020 Sep;218:116934. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116934. Epub 2020 May 13.
5
Linguistic positivity in historical texts reflects dynamic environmental and psychological factors.历史文本中的语言积极性反映了动态的环境和心理因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Dec 6;113(49):E7871-E7879. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1612058113. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
Gender Differences in Emotional Connotative Meaning of Words Measured by Osgood's Semantic Differential Techniques in Young Adults.奥格登语义分化技术测量的年轻人词汇情感内涵意义中的性别差异
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1). doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01126-3. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
7
Building lexicon-based sentiment analysis model for low-resource languages.为低资源语言构建基于词典的情感分析模型。
MethodsX. 2023 Oct 22;11:102460. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102460. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
9
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
10
An ensemble deep learning classifier for sentiment analysis on code-mix Hindi-English data.一种用于印地语-英语代码混合数据情感分析的集成深度学习分类器。
Soft comput. 2022 Apr 23:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s00500-022-07091-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Social and Emotional Competencies of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder and/or Intellectual Disability.患有自闭症谱系障碍和/或智力残疾儿童的社会和情感能力
J Autism Dev Disord. 2025 May 9. doi: 10.1007/s10803-025-06864-2.
2
Predicting subjective ratings of affect and comprehensibility with text features: a reader response study of narrative poetry.利用文本特征预测情感和可理解性的主观评分:叙事诗歌的读者反应研究
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 8;15:1431764. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1431764. eCollection 2024.
3
Computational Models of Readers' Apperceptive Mass.

本文引用的文献

1
Reading Shakespeare Sonnets: Combining Quantitative Narrative Analysis and Predictive Modeling -an Eye Tracking Study.阅读莎士比亚十四行诗:结合定量叙事分析与预测建模——一项眼动追踪研究
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Mar 27;12(5). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.5.2.
2
Sentiment Analysis for Words and Fiction Characters From the Perspective of Computational (Neuro-)Poetics.从计算(神经)诗学视角看词语与虚构人物的情感分析
Front Robot AI. 2019 Jul 17;6:53. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2019.00053. eCollection 2019.
3
What Is the Difference? Rereading Shakespeare's Sonnets -An Eye Tracking Study.
读者统觉团的计算模型
Front Artif Intell. 2022 Feb 22;5:718690. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.718690. eCollection 2022.
有何不同?重读莎士比亚十四行诗——一项眼动追踪研究。
Front Psychol. 2020 Mar 26;11:421. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00421. eCollection 2020.
4
Simple Co-Occurrence Statistics Reproducibly Predict Association Ratings.简单共现统计可重复地预测关联评级。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Sep;42(7):2287-2312. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12662. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
5
Quantifying the Beauty of Words: A Neurocognitive Poetics Perspective.量化文字之美:神经认知诗学视角
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;11:622. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00622. eCollection 2017.
6
On Elementary Affective Decisions: To Like Or Not to Like, That Is the Question.论基本情感决策:喜欢还是不喜欢,这是个问题。
Front Psychol. 2016 Nov 24;7:1836. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01836. eCollection 2016.
7
The Berlin Affective Word List for Children (kidBAWL): Exploring Processing of Affective Lexical Semantics in the Visual and Auditory Modalities.儿童柏林情感词汇表(kidBAWL):探索视觉和听觉模态下情感词汇语义的加工过程。
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 30;7:969. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00969. eCollection 2016.
8
Extrapolating human judgments from skip-gram vector representations of word meaning.从词意的跳字模型向量表示中推断人类判断
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Aug;70(8):1603-1619. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1195417. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Caring About Dostoyevsky: The Untapped Potential of Studying Literature.关怀陀思妥耶夫斯基:研究文学的未开发潜力
Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Apr;20(4):243-245. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.12.009. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
10
The emotion potential of simple sentences: additive or interactive effects of nouns and adjectives?简单句的情感潜能:名词和形容词的累加效应还是交互效应?
Front Psychol. 2015 Aug 11;6:1137. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01137. eCollection 2015.