Western J Sylvia, Dicksit Daniel Devaprakash
Private Dental Practitioner and Consultant Endodontist, Tirunelveli, Tamil Nadu, India.
Faculty of Dentistry, SEGi University, No. 9, Jalan Teknologi, Kota Damansara PJU5 Selangor, Malaysia.
J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):343-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186457.
The aim was to evaluate the efficiency of different sterilization methods on extracted human teeth (EHT) by a systematic review of in vitro randomized controlled trials.
An extensive electronic database literature search concerning the sterilization of EHT was conducted. The search terms used were "human teeth, sterilization, disinfection, randomized controlled trials, and infection control." Randomized controlled trials which aim at comparing the efficiency of different methods of sterilization of EHT were all included in this systematic review.
Out of 1618 articles obtained, eight articles were selected for this systematic review. The sterilization methods reviewed were autoclaving, 10% formalin, 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1% thymol, and boiling to 100°C. Data were extracted from the selected individual studies and their findings were summarized.
Autoclaving and 10% formalin can be considered as 100% efficient and reliable methods. While the use of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite, 3% hydrogen peroxide, 2% glutaraldehyde, 0.1% thymol, and boiling to 100°C was inefficient and unreliable methods of sterilization of EHT.
本研究旨在通过对体外随机对照试验的系统评价,评估不同灭菌方法对拔除的人牙(EHT)的有效性。
针对EHT的灭菌进行了广泛的电子数据库文献检索。使用的检索词为“人牙、灭菌、消毒、随机对照试验和感染控制”。旨在比较EHT不同灭菌方法有效性的随机对照试验均纳入本系统评价。
在获得的1618篇文章中,8篇文章被选入本系统评价。所评价的灭菌方法有高压灭菌、10%福尔马林、5.25%次氯酸钠、3%过氧化氢、2%戊二醛、0.1%百里酚以及煮沸至100°C。从所选的个别研究中提取数据并总结其结果。
高压灭菌和10%福尔马林可被视为100%有效且可靠的方法。而使用5.25%次氯酸钠、3%过氧化氢、2%戊二醛、0.1%百里酚以及煮沸至100°C是EHT低效且不可靠的灭菌方法。