Donadio Giuliana, Lanzilli Mariamichela, Sirec Teja, Ricca Ezio, Isticato Rachele
Department of Biology, Federico II University, via Cinthia-MSA, 80126, Naples, Italy.
School of Life Sciences, Gibbet Hill Campus, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Microb Cell Fact. 2016 Sep 8;15(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12934-016-0551-2.
Bacterial spores have been proposed as vehicles to display heterologous proteins for the development of mucosal vaccines, biocatalysts, bioremediation and diagnostic tools. Two approaches have been developed to display proteins on the spore surface: a recombinant approach, based on the construction of gene fusions between DNA molecules coding for a spore surface protein (carrier) and for the heterologous protein to be displayed (passenger); and a non-recombinant approach based on spore adsorption, a spontaneous interaction between negatively charged, hydrophobic spores and purified proteins. The molecular details of spore adsorption have not been fully clarified yet.
We used the monomeric Red Fluorescent Protein (mRFP) of the coral Discosoma sp. and Bacillus subtilis spores of a wild type and an isogenic mutant strain lacking the CotH protein to clarify the adsorption process. Mutant spores, characterized by a strongly altered coat, were more efficient than wild type spores in adsorbing mRFP but the interaction was less stable and mRFP could be in part released by raising the pH of the spore suspension. A collection of isogenic strains carrying GFP fused to proteins restricted in different compartments of the B. subtilis spore was used to localize adsorbed mRFP molecules. In wild type spores mRFP infiltrated through crust and outer coat, localized in the inner coat and was not surface exposed. In mutant spores mRFP was present in all surface layers, inner, outer coat and crust and was exposed on the spore surface.
Our results indicate that different spores can be selected for different applications. Wild type spores are preferable when a very tight protein-spore interaction is needed, for example to develop reusable biocatalysts or bioremediation systems for field applications. cotH mutant spores are instead preferable when the heterologous protein has to be displayed on the spore surface or has to be released, as could be the case in mucosal delivery systems for antigens and drugs, respectively.
细菌芽孢已被提议作为展示异源蛋白的载体,用于开发黏膜疫苗、生物催化剂、生物修复和诊断工具。已开发出两种在芽孢表面展示蛋白的方法:一种是重组方法,基于构建编码芽孢表面蛋白(载体)和待展示异源蛋白(乘客)的DNA分子之间的基因融合;另一种是非重组方法,基于芽孢吸附,即带负电荷的疏水性芽孢与纯化蛋白之间的自发相互作用。芽孢吸附的分子细节尚未完全阐明。
我们使用珊瑚盘状藻的单体红色荧光蛋白(mRFP)以及野生型枯草芽孢杆菌和缺乏CotH蛋白的同基因突变株的芽孢来阐明吸附过程。突变芽孢的特点是芽孢衣有很大改变,在吸附mRFP方面比野生型芽孢更有效,但相互作用不太稳定,通过提高芽孢悬浮液的pH值,mRFP可以部分释放。使用一组携带与枯草芽孢杆菌芽孢不同区室中受限蛋白融合的绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的同基因菌株来定位吸附的mRFP分子。在野生型芽孢中,mRFP渗透过皮层和外层芽孢衣,定位在内层芽孢衣中,未暴露于表面。在突变芽孢中,mRFP存在于所有表面层,包括内层、外层芽孢衣和皮层,并暴露于芽孢表面。
我们的结果表明,可以针对不同应用选择不同的芽孢。当需要非常紧密的蛋白 - 芽孢相互作用时,例如开发用于现场应用的可重复使用的生物催化剂或生物修复系统,野生型芽孢更可取。相反,当异源蛋白必须展示在芽孢表面或必须释放时,cotH突变芽孢更可取,分别如抗原和药物的黏膜递送系统的情况。