• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国22家实验室之间的细胞遗传学剂量测定比对

Intercomparison in Cytogenetic Dosimetry among 22 Laboratories in China.

作者信息

Liu Jian Xiang, Pan Yan, Ruan Jian Lei, Piao Chunnan, Su Xu

机构信息

Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention Key Laboratory of Radiological Protection and Nuclear Emergency, Beijing 100088, China; National Institute for Radiological Protection, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100088, China; Chinese Center for Medical Response to Radiation Emergency, Ministry of Health, Beijing 100088, China.

出版信息

Genome Integr. 2016 Dec 30;7:6. doi: 10.4103/2041-9414.197164. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.4103/2041-9414.197164
PMID:28217282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5292918/
Abstract

As part of a regional International Atomic Energy Agency-coordinated research project with the support from the National Health and Family Planning Commission of China, 22 laboratories participated in the intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry in China. Slides for chromosomal aberrations were prepared by the Department of Radiation Epidemiology, National Institute for Radiological Protection, which organized the exercise. Slides were sent to the other participating laboratories through Express Mail Service. For estimates of dose, each laboratory scored the frequency of dicentrics plus centric rings chromosomes. The whole blood samples were irradiated with Co γ-rays (1.3 Gy, 2.4 Gy and 1.5 Gy, 2.6 Gy). Each laboratory got one group of the slides. Ten of the 44 estimates of dose fell within ±5% of the true physical dose, 12 fell within ±5-10%, 9 fell within ±10-15%, 12 fell within ±15-20%, while only one sample fell ± >20%. The evaluation of the respective dose was achieved by 21 laboratories.

摘要

作为由国际原子能机构协调、在中国国家卫生和计划生育委员会支持下开展的一个地区性研究项目的一部分,22个实验室参与了中国细胞遗传学剂量测定的比对。用于染色体畸变分析的玻片由组织此次活动的中国国家放射防护研究所辐射流行病学部制备。玻片通过特快专递寄送给其他参与实验室。为了估算剂量,每个实验室对双着丝粒染色体和着丝粒环染色体的频率进行评分。全血样本用钴γ射线(1.3 Gy、2.4 Gy和1.5 Gy、2.6 Gy)进行照射。每个实验室收到一组玻片。44个剂量估算值中有10个落在真实物理剂量的±5%范围内,12个落在±5-10%范围内,9个落在±10-15%范围内,12个落在±15-20%范围内,而只有一个样本的误差超过±20%。21个实验室完成了各自剂量的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/ed9653a1e71d/GI-7-6-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/9ea73574a8b6/GI-7-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/281e01391e16/GI-7-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/f9703f7b0e47/GI-7-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/7523e371c61f/GI-7-6-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/c183bc13b79c/GI-7-6-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/ed9653a1e71d/GI-7-6-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/9ea73574a8b6/GI-7-6-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/281e01391e16/GI-7-6-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/f9703f7b0e47/GI-7-6-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/7523e371c61f/GI-7-6-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/c183bc13b79c/GI-7-6-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5116/5292918/ed9653a1e71d/GI-7-6-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Intercomparison in Cytogenetic Dosimetry among 22 Laboratories in China.中国22家实验室之间的细胞遗传学剂量测定比对
Genome Integr. 2016 Dec 30;7:6. doi: 10.4103/2041-9414.197164. eCollection 2016.
2
Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America.拉丁美洲五个实验室之间的细胞遗传学剂量测定比对。
Mutat Res. 1995 Mar;327(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e.
3
Laboratory Intercomparison of Cytogenetic Dosimetry Among 38 Laboratories in China.中国38家实验室间细胞遗传学剂量测定的实验室间比对
Dose Response. 2019 Mar 12;17(1):1559325819833473. doi: 10.1177/1559325819833473. eCollection 2019 Jan-Mar.
4
Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods.生物剂量学比对实验:使用稳健方法评估分类和常规模式结果。
Radiat Res. 2011 May;175(5):638-49. doi: 10.1667/RR2425.1. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
5
A collaborative exercise on cytogenetic dosimetry for simulated whole and partial body accidental irradiation.一项关于模拟全身和局部身体意外照射的细胞遗传学剂量测定的协作性实验。
Mutat Res. 1987 Aug;179(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(87)90310-1.
6
International intercomparison for criticality dosimetry: the case of biological dosimetry.临界剂量测定的国际比对:生物剂量测定的案例
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;110(1-4):471-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch349.
7
Optimizing the Microscopy Time Schedule for Chromosomal Dosimetry of High-dose and Partial-body Irradiations.优化高剂量和局部身体照射染色体剂量测定的显微镜检查时间安排
Genome Integr. 2017 Jan 23;8:3. doi: 10.4103/2041-9414.198908. eCollection 2017.
8
Intercomparison of personal dosimetry for service providers in Pakistan.巴基斯坦服务提供商个人剂量测定的比对
Health Phys. 2009 Feb;96(2 Suppl):S5-10. doi: 10.1097/01.HP.0000327666.63968.db.
9
Validation of semi-automatic scoring of dicentric chromosomes after simulation of three different irradiation scenarios.验证三种不同照射场景模拟后双着丝粒染色体的半自动评分。
Health Phys. 2014 Jun;106(6):764-71. doi: 10.1097/HP.0000000000000077.
10
Canadian Cytogenetic Emergency network (CEN) for biological dosimetry following radiological/nuclear accidents.加拿大放射生物学剂量测定紧急网络(CEN),用于应对放射/核事故后的生物剂量测定。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2007 Jul;83(7):471-7. doi: 10.1080/09553000701370860.

引用本文的文献

1
Calibration curves by 60Co with low dose rate are different in terms of dose estimation - a comparative study.低剂量率60Co校准曲线在剂量估算方面存在差异——一项对比研究
Genet Mol Biol. 2020 Feb 17;43(1):e20180370. doi: 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2018-0370. eCollection 2020.
2
Validation of the dicentric chromosome assay for radiation biological dosimetry in South Korea.验证双着丝粒染色体分析在韩国的辐射生物剂量学中的应用。
J Radiat Res. 2019 Oct 23;60(5):555-563. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz039.

本文引用的文献

1
Laboratory intercomparison of gene expression assays.基因表达检测的实验室比对。
Radiat Res. 2013 Aug;180(2):138-48. doi: 10.1667/RR3236.1. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
2
Laboratory intercomparison on the γ-H2AX foci assay.γ-H2AX 焦点检测的实验室比对。
Radiat Res. 2013 Aug;180(2):149-55. doi: 10.1667/RR3238.1. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
3
Laboratory intercomparison of the cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay.细胞分裂阻断微核试验的实验室比对。
Radiat Res. 2013 Aug;180(2):120-8. doi: 10.1667/RR3234.1. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
4
Laboratory intercomparison of the dicentric chromosome analysis assay.染色体双着丝粒分析检测的实验室比对
Radiat Res. 2013 Aug;180(2):129-37. doi: 10.1667/RR3235.1. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
5
Biological dosimetry intercomparison exercise: an evaluation of triage and routine mode results by robust methods.生物剂量学比对实验:使用稳健方法评估分类和常规模式结果。
Radiat Res. 2011 May;175(5):638-49. doi: 10.1667/RR2425.1. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
6
International intercomparison for criticality dosimetry: the case of biological dosimetry.临界剂量测定的国际比对:生物剂量测定的案例
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2004;110(1-4):471-6. doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch349.
7
Intercomparison of translocation and dicentric frequencies between laboratories in a follow-up of the radiological accident in Estonia.爱沙尼亚放射事故后续中各实验室间易位和双着丝粒频率的比对。
Int J Radiat Biol. 2002 Oct;78(10):883-90. doi: 10.1080/09553000210155888.
8
Intercomparison in cytogenetic dosimetry among five laboratories from Latin America.拉丁美洲五个实验室之间的细胞遗传学剂量测定比对。
Mutat Res. 1995 Mar;327(1-2):33-9. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)00066-e.
9
Temperature and the formation of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations. II. The temperature dependence of lesion repair and lesion interaction.温度与辐射诱导染色体畸变的形成。II. 损伤修复和损伤相互作用的温度依赖性。
Int J Radiat Biol Relat Stud Phys Chem Med. 1986 Apr;49(4):673-81. doi: 10.1080/09553008514552921.
10
Frequency of chromosomal aberrations in a subject accidentally exposed to 137Cs in the Goiania (Brazil) radiation accident: intercomparison among four laboratories.在戈亚尼亚(巴西)辐射事故中意外接触137铯的一名受试者的染色体畸变频率:四个实验室之间的比对
Mutat Res. 1991 Apr;252(2):157-60. doi: 10.1016/0165-1161(91)90016-2.