Brydak-Godowska Joanna, Gołębiewska Joanna, Turczyńska Monika, Moneta-Wielgoś Joanna, Samsel Agnieszka, Borkowski Piotr K, Ciszek Michał, Płonecka-Rodzoch Agnieszka, Kużnik-Borkowska Aleksandra, Ciszewska Joanna, Makomaska-Szaroszyk Elżbieta, Brydak Lidia B, Kęcik Dariusz
Department of Ophthalmology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Department of Ophthalmology, Children's Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland.
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Mar 2;23:1106-1115. doi: 10.12659/msm.901744.
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to assess the clinical course and distinctive features of different white dot syndromes (WDS) in patients attending the Ophthalmology Department, Medical University of Warsaw in the years 1995-2015. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty-two (62) patients (43 females and 19 males), aged 18 to 77 years, referred with a WDS were included in this prospective study, with observation period ranging from 5 months to 16 years. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmological examination and multimodal imaging studies. RESULTS In this cohort of 62 patients, the following WDS entities were identified: multifocal choroiditis with panuveitis (MFCPU), multifocal choroiditis (MFC), punctate inner choroidopathy (PIC), birdshot, acute posterior multifocal placoid pigment epitheliopathy (APMPPE), subretinal fibrosis and uveitis, multiple evanescent white dot syndrome (MEWDS), serpiginous choroiditis, and single cases of acute annular outer retinopathy (AAOR). CONCLUSIONS The study was performed at a Polish referral center and may to some extent reflect the varied geographical distribution of white dot syndromes, as none of the subjects was found to suffer from acute zonal occult outer retinopathy (AZOOR), acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN), or diffuse unilateral subacute neuroretinitis (DUSN). Long-term follow-up is warranted by the evolution of lesions in the eye fundus, while management depends on correct diagnosis of WDS. When the posterior pole is involved in some cases of the WDS an immunosuppressive treatment, the use of the PDT or anti-VEGF injections were necessary.
背景 本研究旨在评估1995年至2015年期间在华沙医科大学眼科就诊的不同白点综合征(WDS)患者的临床病程和独特特征。
材料与方法 本前瞻性研究纳入了62例(43例女性和19例男性)年龄在18至77岁之间、因白点综合征前来就诊的患者,观察期为5个月至16年。所有患者均接受了全面的眼科检查和多模式影像学检查。
结果 在这62例患者中,确定了以下白点综合征类型:多灶性脉络膜炎伴全葡萄膜炎(MFCPU)、多灶性脉络膜炎(MFC)、点状内层脉络膜病变(PIC)、鸟枪弹样视网膜脉络膜病变、急性后极部多灶性鳞状色素上皮病变(APMPPE)、视网膜下纤维化和葡萄膜炎、多发性一过性白点综合征(MEWDS)、匐行性脉络膜炎,以及急性环形外层视网膜病变(AAOR)的单例。
结论 该研究在波兰的一个转诊中心进行,可能在一定程度上反映了白点综合征的不同地理分布情况,因为未发现任何受试者患有急性区域性隐匿性外层视网膜病变(AZOOR)、急性黄斑神经视网膜病变(AMN)或弥漫性单侧亚急性神经视网膜炎(DUSN)。由于眼底病变的演变,有必要进行长期随访,而治疗则取决于白点综合征的正确诊断。当某些白点综合征病例累及后极部时,免疫抑制治疗、光动力疗法(PDT)或抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)注射是必要的。