Suppr超能文献

4 岁预测早期语法学校对立违抗性障碍。

Age 4 Predictors of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Early Grammar School.

机构信息

a Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry , Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago.

b Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University.

出版信息

J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jan-Feb;48(1):93-107. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280806. Epub 2017 Feb 26.

Abstract

Our ability to predict which children will exhibit oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) at the time of entry into grammar school at age 6 lags behind our understanding of the risk factors for ODD. This study examined how well a set of multidomain risk factors for ODD assessed in 4-year-old children predicted age 6 ODD diagnostic status. Participants were a diverse sample of 796 4-year-old children (391 boys).The sample was 54% White, non-Hispanic; 16.8% African American, 20.4% Hispanic; 2.4% Asian; and 4.4% Other or mixed race. The classification accuracy of two models of multidomain risk factors, using either a measure of overall ODD symptoms or dimensions of ODD obtained at age 4, were compared to one another, to chance, and to a parsimonious model based solely on parent-reported ODD using Automated Classification Tree Analysis. Effect Strength for Sensitivity (ESS), a measure of classification accuracy, indicated a multidomain model including a general measure of ODD symptoms at age 4 yielded a large effect (56.29%), a 13.7% increase over the ESS for the parsimonious model (ESS = 42.9%). The ESS (51.23%) for a model including two ODD dimensions (behavior and negative affect) was smaller than that for the model including a measure of overall ODD symptoms. The Classification Tree Analysis approach showed a small but distinct advantage that would be useful in screening for which children would most likely meet criteria for age 6 ODD.

摘要

我们预测哪些儿童在 6 岁进入小学时会表现出对立违抗性障碍(ODD)的能力落后于我们对 ODD 风险因素的理解。本研究考察了在 4 岁儿童中评估的一组 ODD 多领域风险因素在多大程度上预测了 6 岁时的 ODD 诊断状况。参与者是一个多样化的 796 名 4 岁儿童样本(391 名男孩)。该样本中 54%为白种人,非西班牙裔;16.8%为非裔美国人,20.4%为西班牙裔;2.4%为亚洲人;4.4%为其他或混合种族。使用 4 岁时获得的总体 ODD 症状或 ODD 维度的多维风险因素的两种模型的分类准确性彼此进行了比较,与机会进行了比较,与仅基于父母报告的使用自动分类树分析的 ODD 的简约模型进行了比较。分类精度的效应强度(ESS),一种衡量分类准确性的指标,表明包括 4 岁时一般 ODD 症状的多维模型产生了较大的效果(56.29%),比简约模型的 ESS (42.9%)提高了 13.7%。包括两个 ODD 维度(行为和消极情绪)的模型的 ESS(51.23%)小于包括整体 ODD 症状测量的模型的 ESS。分类树分析方法显示出一个微小但明显的优势,这在筛查哪些儿童最有可能符合 6 岁 ODD 标准方面将非常有用。

相似文献

1
Age 4 Predictors of Oppositional Defiant Disorder in Early Grammar School.4 岁预测早期语法学校对立违抗性障碍。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jan-Feb;48(1):93-107. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1280806. Epub 2017 Feb 26.
4
Neuropsychological Predictors of ODD Symptom Dimensions in Young Children.儿童注意缺陷多动障碍症状维度的神经心理学预测因素。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jan-Feb;48(1):80-92. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2016.1266643. Epub 2017 Jan 12.

本文引用的文献

8
Dimensions of oppositional defiant disorder in 3-year-old preschoolers.3 岁学龄前儿童对立违抗性障碍的维度。
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;53(11):1128-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2012.02545.x. Epub 2012 Mar 12.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验