• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

工作康复出院小结的优势:改善职业康复沟通界面的工具。

Advantages of the JobReha discharge letter: an instrument for improving the communication interface in occupational rehabilitation.

机构信息

Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Coordination Centre for Applied Rehabilitation Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.

出版信息

Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Aug;86(6):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0805-1. Epub 2012 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00420-012-0805-1
PMID:22890776
Abstract

PURPOSE

Systematic collaboration between occupational physicians (OPs) and rehabilitation physicians (RPs) can improve occupational rehabilitation processes and outcomes. The JobReha discharge letter (JR-DL) is a key element of JobReha, a multilevel intervention for specific occupational rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders. This feasibility study aims to analyse the perceived benefit and acceptance of the JR-DL as an instrument for improving the communication interface between RPs and OPs.

METHODS

On the day of discharge from rehabilitation, the rehabilitation physician completed a JR-DL form containing relevant information on the rehabilitation measures undertaken during treatment and recommendations for return to work. The JR-DL was either transmitted to the patient's occupational physician directly or given to the patients to bring to the OP to support the reintegration process. The JR-DL as an instrument for improving the communication interface was evaluated using data from patient questionnaires (n = 250), JR-DLs (n = 247), OP questionnaires (n = 224) and RP questionnaires (n = 232).

RESULTS

All rehabilitation physicians sent a JR-DL to the respective occupational physician on the day of discharge. OPs received the reports a median 2 days after discharge. The content quality and relevance of the JR-DL for the reintegration process were rated high to moderate by more than 97.0 % of the OPs; 92.3 % of the patients received a recommendation to return to their previous workplace; 43.3 % returned with minor limitation; and the remaining 31.6 % with a recommendation for individual reintegration; 74.0 % of the workers returned to work within 3 days of discharge.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the JR-DL for the improvement of communication and exchange of relevant information is feasible and supportive for both rehabilitation and occupational physicians. Its positive impact on reintegration and return to work was apparent. Delays in receipt of the JR-DL should be eliminated by appropriate quality assurance measures.

摘要

目的

职业医生(OP)与康复医生(RP)之间的系统协作可以改善职业康复流程和结果。JobReha 出院信(JR-DL)是 JobReha 的一个关键要素,JobReha 是一种针对肌肉骨骼疾病患者特定职业康复的多层次干预措施。本可行性研究旨在分析 JR-DL 作为改善 RP 和 OP 之间沟通界面的工具的感知益处和接受程度。

方法

在康复治疗结束当天,康复医生填写 JR-DL 表格,其中包含治疗期间所采取的康复措施相关信息和重返工作岗位的建议。JR-DL 要么直接传输给患者的职业医生,要么交给患者带到 OP 以支持重新融入过程。通过对 250 名患者的问卷、247 份 JR-DL、224 名 OP 问卷和 232 名 RP 问卷的数据评估 JR-DL 作为改善沟通界面的工具。

结果

所有康复医生在出院当天都将 JR-DL 发送给了相应的职业医生。OP 大约在出院后第 2 天收到报告。超过 97.0%的 OP 对 JR-DL 对重新融入过程的内容质量和相关性评价为高到中等;92.3%的患者收到了返回之前工作场所的建议;43.3%的患者以较小的限制返回;其余 31.6%的患者收到了个性化融入的建议;74.0%的员工在出院后 3 天内重返工作岗位。

结论

使用 JR-DL 改善沟通和交换相关信息是可行的,并且对康复医生和职业医生都有支持作用。它对重新融入和重返工作的积极影响是明显的。应通过适当的质量保证措施消除 JR-DL 延迟接收的问题。

相似文献

1
Advantages of the JobReha discharge letter: an instrument for improving the communication interface in occupational rehabilitation.工作康复出院小结的优势:改善职业康复沟通界面的工具。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Aug;86(6):699-708. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0805-1. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
2
Outpatient rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders using structured workplace description.使用结构化工作场所描述对肌肉骨骼疾病工人进行门诊康复治疗。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Mar;82(4):427-34. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0346-9. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
3
["Vocational perspective"--short-term efficacy of a group treatment for patients with extensive work-related problems during medical rehabilitation].["职业视角"——针对医疗康复期间存在大量与工作相关问题的患者进行小组治疗的短期疗效]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2012 Jan;51(1):39-51. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299692. Epub 2012 Feb 6.
4
Design of a study evaluating the effects, health economics, and stakeholder perspectives of a multi-component occupational rehabilitation program with an added workplace intervention - a  study protocol.一项多组分职业康复计划(增加了工作场所干预措施)的效果、健康经济学和利益相关者观点评估研究的设计 - 研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5130-5.
5
[Stepwise occupational reintegration after orthopedic rehabilitation--participants, realization, effectiveness, and optimization requirements].[骨科康复后的逐步职业再融入——参与者、实施、效果及优化要求]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2004 Jun;43(3):152-61. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-814985.
6
Experiences, attitudes and possibilities for improvement concerning the cooperation between occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners in Germany from the perspectives of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients - a protocol for a qualitative study.从医疗群体和康复患者的角度看德国职业医师、康复医师和全科医生之间合作的经验、态度及改进可能性——一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e014228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014228.
7
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.优化德国全科医生、职业健康和康复医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
[Deficiencies and barriers of the cooperation between German general practitioners and occupational health physicians? A qualitative content analysis of focus groups].[德国全科医生与职业健康医生合作中的不足与障碍?焦点小组的定性内容分析]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2012;106(9):639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
9
[Effects of work-related medical rehabilitation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders].[工作相关的医学康复对肌肉骨骼疾病患者的影响]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2006 Jun;45(3):161-71. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-915282.
10
Return to work after rehabilitation in chronic low back pain workers. Does the interprofessional collaboration work?
J Interprof Care. 2018 Jul;32(4):521-524. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2018.1450231. Epub 2018 Mar 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Patients' Needs Regarding Work-Focused Healthcare: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis.患者对以工作为重点的医疗保健的需求:一项定性证据综合分析
J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Jul 25. doi: 10.1007/s10926-024-10225-8.
2
Requirements for an electronic handover system for interprofessional collaboration between psychotherapists and occupational health professionals - a qualitative study.跨专业合作的电子交接系统需求:精神治疗师与职业健康专家的定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Aug 25;22(1):1087. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08381-9.
3
The role of general practitioners in the work guidance of cancer patients: views of general practitioners and occupational physicians.

本文引用的文献

1
Low back pain patients' experiences of work modifications; a qualitative study.腰痛患者工作调整的体验:一项定性研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Dec 6;11:277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-277.
2
Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions.工作场所干预措施可提高长期请病假腰痛员工的返岗率:干预措施的有效性和成本效益的系统评价。
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607-21. doi: 10.3109/09638280903186301.
3
Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme.
全科医生在癌症患者工作指导中的作用:全科医生和职业医生的观点。
J Cancer Surviv. 2023 Apr;17(2):416-424. doi: 10.1007/s11764-022-01211-1. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
4
Return to Work after Common Mental Disorders: A Qualitative Study Exploring the Expectations of the Involved Stakeholders.常见精神障碍患者重返工作岗位:一项探索相关利益攸关方期望的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 11;17(18):6635. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186635.
5
Image and perception of physicians as barriers to inter-disciplinary cooperation? - the example of German occupational health physicians in the rehabilitation process: a qualitative study.医生的形象和认知是跨学科合作的障碍吗?——以德国职业健康医生在康复过程中的情况为例:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 11;18(1):769. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3564-1.
6
A call for Applied Knowledge and Lived Interdisciplinarity in the medical care of depressed employees: a cross-sectional survey with German occupational physicians and psychotherapists.呼吁在抑郁员工的医疗护理中应用知识和进行实际跨学科合作:对德国职业医师和心理治疗师的横断面调查
BMJ Open. 2018 Aug 13;8(8):e021786. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021786.
7
Information exchange using a prescribed form and involvement of occupational health nurses promotes occupational physicians to collaborate with attending physicians for supporting workers with illness in Japan.在日本,使用规定表格进行信息交流以及职业健康护士的参与,促使职业医生与主治医生合作,以支持患病工人。
Ind Health. 2019 Feb 5;57(1):10-21. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.2017-0133. Epub 2017 Dec 19.
8
Optimizing cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: a qualitative study.优化德国全科医生、职业健康和康复医生之间的合作:一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Nov;90(8):809-821. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1239-6. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Experiences, attitudes and possibilities for improvement concerning the cooperation between occupational physicians, rehabilitation physicians and general practitioners in Germany from the perspectives of the medical groups and rehabilitation patients - a protocol for a qualitative study.从医疗群体和康复患者的角度看德国职业医师、康复医师和全科医生之间合作的经验、态度及改进可能性——一项定性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e014228. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014228.
10
Cooperation between general practitioners, occupational health physicians, and rehabilitation physicians in Germany: what are problems and barriers to cooperation? A qualitative study.德国全科医生、职业健康医生和康复医生之间的合作:合作存在哪些问题和障碍?一项定性研究。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2017 Aug;90(6):481-490. doi: 10.1007/s00420-017-1210-6. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
多利益相关方重返工作方案实施经验。
J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Dec;19(4):409-18. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9195-y.
4
Designing a workplace return-to-work program for occupational low back pain: an intervention mapping approach.为职业性下背痛设计一个工作场所重返工作岗位计划:一种干预映射方法。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Jun 9;10:65. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-65.
5
[Rehabilitation in the view of small and midsized enterprises: knowledge, appreciation and possibilities to cooperate - results of the KoRB-project].[中小企业视角下的康复:知识、认知及合作可能性——KoRB项目成果]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Dec;47(6):324-33. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1102951. Epub 2008 Dec 15.
6
[Efficacy of intensified inpatient rehabilitation in musculoskeletal disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis].[强化住院康复治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析]
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2008 Aug;47(4):200-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1077091.
7
Outpatient rehabilitation of workers with musculoskeletal disorders using structured workplace description.使用结构化工作场所描述对肌肉骨骼疾病工人进行门诊康复治疗。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2009 Mar;82(4):427-34. doi: 10.1007/s00420-008-0346-9. Epub 2008 Aug 9.
8
Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature.基于工作场所的重返工作干预措施:对定量文献的系统评价
J Occup Rehabil. 2005 Dec;15(4):607-31. doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8038-8.
9
[Occupational orientation in medical rehabilitation and measures for participation in the professional life].
Rehabilitation (Stuttg). 2005 Oct;44(5):287-96. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-867003.
10
Lost productive time and cost due to common pain conditions in the US workforce.美国劳动力因常见疼痛状况而损失的生产时间和成本。
JAMA. 2003 Nov 12;290(18):2443-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.290.18.2443.