• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在人造语言中习得语言变体:儿童和成人对社会条件制约下的语言变体很敏感。

Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation.

作者信息

Samara Anna, Smith Kenny, Brown Helen, Wonnacott Elizabeth

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, United Kingdom.

School of Philosophy, Psychology and Language Sciences, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cogn Psychol. 2017 May;94:85-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.004
PMID:28340356
Abstract

Languages exhibit sociolinguistic variation, such that adult native speakers condition the usage of linguistic variants on social context, gender, and ethnicity, among other cues. While the existence of this kind of socially conditioned variation is well-established, less is known about how it is acquired. Studies of naturalistic language use by children provide various examples where children's production of sociolinguistic variants appears to be conditioned on similar factors to adults' production, but it is difficult to determine whether this reflects knowledge of sociolinguistic conditioning or systematic differences in the input to children from different social groups. Furthermore, artificial language learning experiments have shown that children have a tendency to eliminate variation, a process which could potentially work against their acquisition of sociolinguistic variation. The current study used a semi-artificial language learning paradigm to investigate learning of the sociolinguistic cue of speaker identity in 6-year-olds and adults. Participants were trained and tested on an artificial language where nouns were obligatorily followed by one of two meaningless particles and were produced by one of two speakers (one male, one female). Particle usage was conditioned deterministically on speaker identity (Experiment 1), probabilistically (Experiment 2), or not at all (Experiment 3). Participants were given tests of production and comprehension. In Experiments 1 and 2, both children and adults successfully acquired the speaker identity cue, although the effect was stronger for adults and in Experiment 1. In addition, in all three experiments, there was evidence of regularization in participants' productions, although the type of regularization differed with age: children showed regularization by boosting the frequency of one particle at the expense of the other, while adults regularized by conditioning particle usage on lexical items. Overall, results demonstrate that children and adults are sensitive to speaker identity cues, an ability which is fundamental to tracking sociolinguistic variation, and that children's well-established tendency to regularize does not prevent them from learning sociolinguistically conditioned variation.

摘要

语言呈现出社会语言学变异,以至于成年母语使用者会根据社会语境、性别、种族等线索来决定语言变体的使用。虽然这种受社会条件制约的变异的存在已得到充分证实,但对于它是如何习得的却知之甚少。对儿童自然语言使用的研究提供了各种例子,其中儿童对社会语言学变体的产出似乎与成年人的产出受类似因素的制约,但很难确定这是否反映了对社会语言学制约的了解,还是不同社会群体向儿童提供的输入存在系统性差异。此外,人工语言学习实验表明,儿童有消除变异的倾向,这一过程可能会阻碍他们对社会语言学变异的习得。当前的研究使用了一种半人工语言学习范式,来调查6岁儿童和成年人对说话者身份这一社会语言学线索的学习情况。参与者在一种人工语言上接受训练和测试,在这种语言中,名词后面必须跟两个无意义的词素之一,且由两个说话者(一男一女)之一说出。词素的使用根据说话者身份被确定性地制约(实验1)、概率性地制约(实验2)或完全不被制约(实验3)。对参与者进行了产出和理解测试。在实验1和实验2中,儿童和成年人都成功习得说话者身份线索,尽管对成年人的影响更强,且在实验1中效果更明显。此外,在所有三个实验中,都有证据表明参与者的产出存在规则化现象,尽管规则化的类型因年龄而异:儿童通过提高一个词素的频率而降低另一个词素的频率来实现规则化,而成年人则通过根据词汇项目来制约词素的使用来实现规则化。总体而言,结果表明儿童和成年人对说话者身份线索很敏感,这是追踪社会语言学变异的一项基本能力,而且儿童既定的规则化倾向并不会妨碍他们学习受社会语言学条件制约的变异。

相似文献

1
Acquiring variation in an artificial language: Children and adults are sensitive to socially conditioned linguistic variation.在人造语言中习得语言变体:儿童和成人对社会条件制约下的语言变体很敏感。
Cogn Psychol. 2017 May;94:85-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
2
When regularization gets it wrong: children over-simplify language input only in production.当正则化出错时:儿童仅在语言产出中过度简化语言输入。
J Child Lang. 2018 Sep;45(5):1054-1072. doi: 10.1017/S0305000918000041. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
3
Experience With a Linguistic Variant Affects the Acquisition of Its Sociolinguistic Meaning: An Alien-Language-Learning Experiment.语言变体的使用经验会影响其社会语言意义的习得:一项外语学习实验。
Cogn Sci. 2020 Apr;44(4):e12832. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12832.
4
Personae in sociolinguistic variation.社会语言学变异中的角色。
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2020 Nov;11(6):e1543. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1543. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
5
Children's understanding of speaker reliability between lexical and syntactic knowledge.儿童对词汇和句法知识之间说话人可靠性的理解。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Mar;49(3):523-32. doi: 10.1037/a0029658. Epub 2012 Aug 13.
6
Regularization of languages by adults and children: A mathematical framework.成人和儿童对语言的规范化:一个数学框架。
Cogn Psychol. 2016 Feb;84:1-30. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.10.001. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
7
Children's sociolinguistic evaluations of nice foreigners and mean Americans.儿童对友善的外国人和刻薄的美国人的社会语言评价。
Dev Psychol. 2013 Apr;49(4):655-64. doi: 10.1037/a0028740. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
8
Development in children's comprehension of linguistic register.儿童对语言语域理解的发展。
Child Dev. 2010 Nov-Dec;81(6):1678-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01502.x.
9
One frog, two frog, red frog, blue frog: factors affecting children's syntactic choices in production and comprehension.一只青蛙,两只青蛙,红青蛙,蓝青蛙:影响儿童在语言产出和理解中句法选择的因素。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2000 Nov;29(6):597-626. doi: 10.1023/a:1026468209238.
10
Children's selective trust in native-accented speakers.儿童对母语口音说话者的选择性信任。
Dev Sci. 2011 Jan;14(1):106-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00965.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Articulation-Function-Associated Cortical Developmental Changes in Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者与发音功能相关的皮质发育变化
Brain Sci. 2023 Mar 25;13(4):550. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040550.
2
Drift as a Driver of Language Change: An Artificial Language Experiment.漂移作为语言变化的驱动力:一项人工语言实验。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Sep;46(9):e13197. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13197.
3
Probability matching is not the default decision making strategy in human and non-human primates.在人类和非人类灵长类动物中,概率匹配不是默认的决策制定策略。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 30;12(1):13092. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16983-w.
4
Kindergarteners Use Cross-Situational Statistics to Infer the Meaning of Grammatical Elements.幼儿园儿童通过跨情境统计推断语法元素的意义。
J Psycholinguist Res. 2022 Dec;51(6):1311-1333. doi: 10.1007/s10936-022-09898-0. Epub 2022 Jul 6.
5
Learning a language from inconsistent input: Regularization in child and adult learners.从不一致的输入中学习语言:儿童和成人学习者的正则化
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(3):249-277. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1954927. Epub 2021 Sep 22.
6
Category Clustering and Morphological Learning.类别聚类和形态学学习。
Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13107. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13107.
7
Imperfect language learning reduces morphological overspecification: Experimental evidence.不完善的语言学习减少形态过度指定:实验证据。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 27;17(1):e0262876. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262876. eCollection 2022.
8
Fast but Not Furious. When Sped Up Bit Rate of Information Drives Rule Induction.快而不乱。当信息的加速比特率推动规则归纳时。
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:661785. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.661785. eCollection 2021.
9
Can we detect conditioned variation in political speech? two kinds of discussion and types of conversation.我们能否检测出政治演讲中的条件性变化?两种讨论和对话类型。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246689. eCollection 2021.
10
Adult Learning and Language Simplification.成人学习与语言简化。
Cogn Sci. 2018 Nov;42(8):2818-2854. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12686. Epub 2018 Oct 15.