Brandt Mark J
Department of Social Psychology, Tilburg University.
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jun;28(6):713-722. doi: 10.1177/0956797617693004. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
A major shortcoming of current models of ideological prejudice is that although they can anticipate the direction of the association between participants' ideology and their prejudice against a range of target groups, they cannot predict the size of this association. I developed and tested models that can make specific size predictions for this association. A quantitative model that used the perceived ideology of the target group as the primary predictor of the ideology-prejudice relationship was developed with a representative sample of Americans ( N = 4,940) and tested against models using the perceived status of and choice to belong to the target group as predictors. In four studies (total N = 2,093), ideology-prejudice associations were estimated, and these observed estimates were compared with the models' predictions. The model that was based only on perceived ideology was the most parsimonious with the smallest errors.
当前意识形态偏见模型的一个主要缺点是，尽管它们能够预测参与者的意识形态与他们对一系列目标群体的偏见之间关联的方向，但却无法预测这种关联的程度。我开发并测试了能够对这种关联做出具体程度预测的模型。利用一个具有代表性的美国样本（N = 4,940），开发了一个将目标群体的感知意识形态作为意识形态 - 偏见关系主要预测指标的定量模型，并与使用目标群体的感知地位和归属选择作为预测指标的模型进行了对比测试。在四项研究（总样本量N = 2,093）中，对意识形态 - 偏见关联进行了估计，并将这些观察到的估计值与模型的预测值进行了比较。仅基于感知意识形态的模型最为简洁，误差最小。
