• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Socioeconomic position and mortality risk of smoking: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).社会经济地位与吸烟的死亡风险:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的证据。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx059.
2
Mortality risk attributable to smoking, hypertension and diabetes among English and Brazilian older adults (The ELSA and Bambui cohort ageing studies).英国和巴西老年人中归因于吸烟、高血压和糖尿病的死亡风险(ELSA和班布伊队列老龄化研究)
Eur J Public Health. 2016 Oct;26(5):831-835. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckv225. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
3
Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?教育程度与职业社会阶层:哪一个是死亡风险更重要的指标?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Mar;52(3):153-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.3.153.
4
Does use of flue-cured rather than blended cigarettes affect international variation in mortality from lung cancer and COPD?使用烤烟而不是混合型香烟是否会影响肺癌和 COPD 死亡率的国际差异?
Inhal Toxicol. 2009 Apr;21(5):404-30. doi: 10.1080/08958370802317737.
5
The moderating effect of childhood disadvantage on the associations between smoking and occupational exposure and lung function; a cross sectional analysis of the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS).童年逆境对吸烟和职业暴露与肺功能关联的调节作用;英国家庭纵向研究(UKHLS)的横断面分析。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jun 4;19(1):690. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7039-z.
6
Association of Cigarette, Cigar, and Pipe Use With Mortality Risk in the US Population.美国人群中香烟、雪茄和烟斗使用与死亡率风险的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):469-476. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8625.
7
Smoking cessation affects the natural history of COPD.戒烟会影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病的自然病程。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Nov 16;12:3323-3328. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S150243. eCollection 2017.
8
Modifiable risk factors for 9-year mortality in older English and Brazilian adults: The ELSA and SIGa-Bagé ageing cohorts.可改变的风险因素对英国和巴西老年成年人 9 年死亡率的影响:ELSA 和 SIGa-Bagé 老龄化队列研究。
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 9;10(1):4375. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61127-7.
9
Attributable and absolute risk of lung cancer death by smoking status: findings from the Japan Collaborative Cohort Study.按吸烟状况划分的肺癌死亡归因风险和绝对风险:日本协作队列研究的结果
Int J Cancer. 2003 Jun 10;105(2):249-54. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11043.
10
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.1990 - 2020年按病因划分的死亡率和残疾率的替代预测:全球疾病负担研究
Lancet. 1997 May 24;349(9064):1498-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Income level is associated with differences in primary and secondary stroke prevention in China.在中国,收入水平与一级和二级卒中预防的差异相关。
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Oct 28;20(5):1472-1483. doi: 10.5114/aoms/178269. eCollection 2024.
2
Changes in prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of tobacco and nicotine use in Finland during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间芬兰烟草和尼古丁使用的流行率变化及社会人口学相关因素
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):844-850. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad104.
3
Mortality Relative Risks by Smoking, Race/Ethnicity, and Education.吸烟、种族/民族和教育与死亡率的相对风险。
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4 Suppl 1):S53-S62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
4
Birth Cohort‒Specific Smoking Patterns by Family Income in the U.S.美国不同家庭收入出生队列人群的吸烟模式
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4 Suppl 1):S32-S41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.07.019. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Educational Attainment and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause Mortality in the US.教育程度和生活方式风险因素与美国全因死亡率的关系。
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr;3(4). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
6
Comparison of mortality hazard ratios associated with health behaviours in Canada and the United States: a population-based linked health survey study.加拿大和美国与健康行为相关的死亡率风险比比较:一项基于人群的关联健康调查研究。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Mar 10;22(1):478. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-12849-y.
7
A scoping review on disparities in exposure to advertising for e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products and implications for advancing a health equity research agenda.一项关于电子烟和加热烟草产品广告暴露差异及其对推进健康公平研究议程的影响的范围综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Oct 30;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01576-2.
8
Novel App-Based Portable Spirometer for the Early Detection of COPD.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病早期检测的新型基于应用程序的便携式肺活量计。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;11(5):785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050785.
9
Social inequalities in tobacco-attributable mortality in Spain. The intersection between age, sex and educational level.西班牙烟草归因死亡率的社会不平等。年龄、性别和教育水平的交叉。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239866. eCollection 2020.
10
Epilepsy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey 2013, 2015, and 2017.美国成年人中的癫痫和慢性阻塞性肺疾病:2013、2015 和 2017 年全国健康访谈调查。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107175. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107175. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Are major behavioral and sociodemographic risk factors for mortality additive or multiplicative in their effects?导致死亡的主要行为和社会人口统计学风险因素在其影响方面是相加的还是相乘的?
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Apr;154:93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
2
Education and cause-specific mortality: the mediating role of differential exposure and vulnerability to behavioral risk factors.教育与特定病因死亡率:差异暴露及对行为风险因素易感性的中介作用
Epidemiology. 2014 May;25(3):389-96. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000080.
3
Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence.烟草控制干预措施对吸烟方面社会经济不平等的影响:证据综述
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e89-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers.戒烟行为疗法:不同干预类型对弱势和富裕吸烟者的有效性。
Addict Behav. 2013 Nov;38(11):2787-96. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
5
Cohort profile: the English longitudinal study of ageing.队列简介:英国老龄化纵向研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1640-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys168. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.体力活动与肺癌风险:前瞻性队列研究的荟萃分析
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3143-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.7.3143.
7
That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4.吸烟影响应以包年衡量:误区 4。
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):406-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.97.
8
Additive interaction in survival analysis: use of the additive hazards model.生存分析中的相加交互作用:相加风险模型的应用。
Epidemiology. 2012 Sep;23(5):733-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa218.
9
Trends in social inequalities for premature coronary heart disease mortality in Great Britain, 1994-2008: a time trend ecological study.1994 - 2008年英国冠心病过早死亡的社会不平等趋势:一项时间趋势生态研究
BMJ Open. 2012 Jun 18;2(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000737. Print 2012.
10
Does the association between smoking and mortality differ by educational level?吸烟与死亡率之间的关联是否因教育程度而异?
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

社会经济地位与吸烟的死亡风险:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的证据。

Socioeconomic position and mortality risk of smoking: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).

机构信息

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx059.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx059
PMID:28481981
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5881724/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether the harm associated with smoking differs by socioeconomic status. This study tests the hypothesis that smoking confers a greater mortality risk for individuals in low socioeconomic groups, using a cohort of 18 479 adults drawn from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Methods:- Additive hazards models were used to estimate the absolute smoking-related risk of death due to lung cancer or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Smoking was measured using a continuous index that incorporated the duration of smoking, intensity of smoking and the time since cessation. Attributable death rates were reported for different levels of education, occupational class, income and wealth.

RESULTS

Smoking was associated with higher absolute mortality risk in lower socioeconomic groups for all four socioeconomic indicators. For example, smoking 20 cigarettes per day for 40 years was associated with 898 (95% CI 738, 1058) deaths due to lung cancer or COPD per 100 000 person-years among participants in the bottom income tertile, compared to 327 (95% CI 209, 445) among participants in the top tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is associated with greater absolute mortality risk for individuals in lower socioeconomic groups. This suggests greater public health benefits of smoking prevention or cessation in these groups.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚与吸烟相关的危害是否因社会经济地位而异。本研究使用来自英国老龄化纵向研究的 18479 名成年人队列,检验了吸烟对社会经济地位较低的个体死亡率风险更高的假设。

方法

采用加性风险模型估计吸烟与肺癌或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关的绝对死亡风险。吸烟使用包含吸烟持续时间、吸烟强度和戒烟时间的连续指数来衡量。报告了不同教育程度、职业类别、收入和财富水平的归因死亡率。

结果

对于所有四个社会经济指标,吸烟与较低社会经济群体的更高绝对死亡率风险相关。例如,在收入最低的三分之一参与者中,每天吸 20 支烟,吸 40 年,与每 100000 人年中 898 人(95%CI738,1058)死于肺癌或 COPD 相关,而在收入最高的三分之一参与者中,这一数字为 327 人(95%CI209,445)。

结论

吸烟与较低社会经济群体的个体绝对死亡率风险更高相关。这表明,在这些群体中,预防或戒烟的公共卫生效益更大。