Suppr超能文献

社会经济地位与吸烟的死亡风险:来自英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的证据。

Socioeconomic position and mortality risk of smoking: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA).

机构信息

Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

International Inequalities Institute, London School of Economics, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2017 Dec 1;27(6):1068-1073. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx059.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is not clear whether the harm associated with smoking differs by socioeconomic status. This study tests the hypothesis that smoking confers a greater mortality risk for individuals in low socioeconomic groups, using a cohort of 18 479 adults drawn from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Methods:- Additive hazards models were used to estimate the absolute smoking-related risk of death due to lung cancer or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Smoking was measured using a continuous index that incorporated the duration of smoking, intensity of smoking and the time since cessation. Attributable death rates were reported for different levels of education, occupational class, income and wealth.

RESULTS

Smoking was associated with higher absolute mortality risk in lower socioeconomic groups for all four socioeconomic indicators. For example, smoking 20 cigarettes per day for 40 years was associated with 898 (95% CI 738, 1058) deaths due to lung cancer or COPD per 100 000 person-years among participants in the bottom income tertile, compared to 327 (95% CI 209, 445) among participants in the top tertile.

CONCLUSIONS

Smoking is associated with greater absolute mortality risk for individuals in lower socioeconomic groups. This suggests greater public health benefits of smoking prevention or cessation in these groups.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚与吸烟相关的危害是否因社会经济地位而异。本研究使用来自英国老龄化纵向研究的 18479 名成年人队列,检验了吸烟对社会经济地位较低的个体死亡率风险更高的假设。

方法

采用加性风险模型估计吸烟与肺癌或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)相关的绝对死亡风险。吸烟使用包含吸烟持续时间、吸烟强度和戒烟时间的连续指数来衡量。报告了不同教育程度、职业类别、收入和财富水平的归因死亡率。

结果

对于所有四个社会经济指标,吸烟与较低社会经济群体的更高绝对死亡率风险相关。例如,在收入最低的三分之一参与者中,每天吸 20 支烟,吸 40 年,与每 100000 人年中 898 人(95%CI738,1058)死于肺癌或 COPD 相关,而在收入最高的三分之一参与者中,这一数字为 327 人(95%CI209,445)。

结论

吸烟与较低社会经济群体的个体绝对死亡率风险更高相关。这表明,在这些群体中,预防或戒烟的公共卫生效益更大。

相似文献

3
Education and occupational social class: which is the more important indicator of mortality risk?
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Mar;52(3):153-60. doi: 10.1136/jech.52.3.153.
6
Association of Cigarette, Cigar, and Pipe Use With Mortality Risk in the US Population.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Apr 1;178(4):469-476. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.8625.
7
Smoking cessation affects the natural history of COPD.
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Nov 16;12:3323-3328. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S150243. eCollection 2017.
10
Alternative projections of mortality and disability by cause 1990-2020: Global Burden of Disease Study.
Lancet. 1997 May 24;349(9064):1498-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07492-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Income level is associated with differences in primary and secondary stroke prevention in China.
Arch Med Sci. 2024 Oct 28;20(5):1472-1483. doi: 10.5114/aoms/178269. eCollection 2024.
3
Mortality Relative Risks by Smoking, Race/Ethnicity, and Education.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4 Suppl 1):S53-S62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.12.006. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
4
Birth Cohort‒Specific Smoking Patterns by Family Income in the U.S.
Am J Prev Med. 2023 Apr;64(4 Suppl 1):S32-S41. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.07.019. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Educational Attainment and Lifestyle Risk Factors Associated With All-Cause Mortality in the US.
JAMA Health Forum. 2022 Apr;3(4). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2022.0401. Epub 2022 Apr 8.
8
Novel App-Based Portable Spirometer for the Early Detection of COPD.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Apr 27;11(5):785. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11050785.
9
Social inequalities in tobacco-attributable mortality in Spain. The intersection between age, sex and educational level.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 28;15(9):e0239866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239866. eCollection 2020.
10
Epilepsy and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease among U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey 2013, 2015, and 2017.
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Sep;110:107175. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107175. Epub 2020 Jun 9.

本文引用的文献

1
Are major behavioral and sociodemographic risk factors for mortality additive or multiplicative in their effects?
Soc Sci Med. 2016 Apr;154:93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.02.009. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
3
Impact of tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: review of the evidence.
Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e89-97. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051110. Epub 2013 Sep 17.
4
Behavioural therapy for smoking cessation: the effectiveness of different intervention types for disadvantaged and affluent smokers.
Addict Behav. 2013 Nov;38(11):2787-96. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.07.010. Epub 2013 Jul 21.
5
Cohort profile: the English longitudinal study of ageing.
Int J Epidemiol. 2013 Dec;42(6):1640-8. doi: 10.1093/ije/dys168. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
6
Physical activity and risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3143-7. doi: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.7.3143.
7
That the effects of smoking should be measured in pack-years: misconceptions 4.
Br J Cancer. 2012 Jul 24;107(3):406-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.97.
8
Additive interaction in survival analysis: use of the additive hazards model.
Epidemiology. 2012 Sep;23(5):733-7. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e31825fa218.
10
Does the association between smoking and mortality differ by educational level?
Soc Sci Med. 2012 May;74(9):1402-6. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验