Suppr超能文献

儿童嗅觉阈值和气味辨别能力的评估——改良“嗅棒测试”的评估。

Olfactory threshold and odor discrimination ability in children - evaluation of a modified "Sniffin' Sticks" test.

机构信息

Abteilung Neuropädiatrie, Medizinische Fakultät Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Smell & Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, "Technische Universität Dresden", Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2017 May 16;7(1):1928. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01465-1.

Abstract

The clinical diagnostics of olfactory dysfunction in children turns out to be challenging due to low attention span, insufficient linguistic development and lack of odor experiences. Several smell tests have been developed for adults. Most of these examinations take a relatively long time and require a high level of concentration. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to evaluate an odor discrimination and olfactory threshold test using the frequently used "Sniffin' Sticks" in children and adolescents in a simplified two-alternative-forced-choice version (2AFC) and compare it to the original three-alternative-forced-choice test (3AFC). One-hundred-twenty-one healthy participants aged between 5 and 17 years took part in this study. Within each of the two sessions participants underwent olfactory testing using the modified 2AFC as well as the standard 3AFC method. A better test-retest reliability was achieved using the original 3AFC method compared to the modified 2AFC. This was true for the odor discrimination as well as the olfactory threshold. Age had a significant influence on both tests, which should be considered when testing young children. We discuss these findings with relation to the existing norms and recommend using the 3AFC version due to a better test-retest reliability to measure olfactory function in children.

摘要

由于儿童注意力持续时间短、语言发育不足和缺乏嗅觉体验,儿童嗅觉功能障碍的临床诊断结果具有挑战性。已经为成年人开发了几种嗅觉测试。这些检查中的大多数都需要相对较长的时间,并且需要高度集中注意力。因此,本研究旨在评估使用常用的“Sniffin' Sticks”在简化的两种选择强制选择(2AFC)版本中对儿童和青少年进行的气味辨别和嗅觉阈值测试,并将其与原始的三种选择强制选择测试(3AFC)进行比较。121 名年龄在 5 至 17 岁之间的健康参与者参加了这项研究。在每个测试会话中,参与者都使用改良的 2AFC 和标准的 3AFC 方法进行嗅觉测试。与改良的 2AFC 相比,原始的 3AFC 方法实现了更好的测试-重测可靠性。这对于气味辨别和嗅觉阈值都是如此。年龄对这两个测试都有显著影响,在测试幼儿时应考虑这一点。我们根据现有的规范讨论了这些发现,并建议使用 3AFC 版本,因为其测试-重测可靠性更好,可用于测量儿童的嗅觉功能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验