Freckmann Guido, Baumstark Annette, Pleus Stefan
1 Institut für Diabetes-Technologie Forschungs- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH an der Universität Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2017 Nov;11(6):1240-1246. doi: 10.1177/1932296817713220. Epub 2017 Jun 6.
Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published guidance documents for point-of-care testing (POCT) and over-the-counter (OTC) blood glucose monitoring systems (BGMS). These are expected to improve weaknesses of the already established ISO 15197:2013 standard accuracy evaluation for OTC BGMS; however, the proposed criteria and procedures rather raise new questions. As an example, the OTC guidance stipulates tighter accuracy criteria in the low glycemic range than the POCT guidance for no obvious reason. Furthermore, a clear definition of requirements for the reference method is missing under consideration of the strict accuracy criteria. External surveillance of BGMS after introduction to the market is an issue that is addressed neither in the FDA documents, nor in ISO 15197, but in the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline POCT12-A3.
最近,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)发布了即时检验(POCT)和非处方(OTC)血糖监测系统(BGMS)的指导文件。这些文件有望改善已确立的ISO 15197:2013标准对非处方BGMS准确性评估的不足之处;然而,提议的标准和程序反而引发了新问题。例如,非处方指导规定在低血糖范围内的准确性标准比即时检验指导更为严格,却没有明显原因。此外,在考虑严格的准确性标准时,缺少对参考方法要求的明确定义。血糖监测系统在引入市场后的外部监督是一个问题,FDA文件和ISO 15197均未涉及,但临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)的指导文件POCT12 - A3中有提及。