Suppr超能文献

一项关于外侧楔形足弓支撑鞋垫对减轻膝内侧骨关节炎患者膝关节负荷影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。

A systematic review and meta-analysis into the effect of lateral wedge arch support insoles for reducing knee joint load in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis.

作者信息

Xing Fei, Lu Bin, Kuang Ming-Jie, Wang Ying, Zhao Yun-Long, Zhao Jie, Sun Lei, Wang Yan, Ma Jian-Xiong, Ma Xin-Long

机构信息

Biomechanics Labs of Orthopedics Institute, Tianjin Hospital Tianjin Medical University Department of Orthopedics, Tianjin Hospital, Tianjin, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(24):e7168. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007168.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the immediate effects of lateral wedge arch support insoles (LWAS) on reducing the knee joint load in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with an appropriate control.

METHODS

Databases including Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, Wiley Online Library, Cochrane library, and Google Scholar were searched with no limits on study date or language, from the earliest available date to October 31, 2016. The included studies had to have the aim of reducing knee load and have an appropriate control. The main measured values were the first and second peak external knee adduction moments (EKAM) and the knee adduction angular impulse (KAAI). The random-effects model was used for analyzing the eligible studies.

RESULTS

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 356 participants of whom 337 received LWAS treatment. The risk of methodological bias scores (quality index) ranged from 21 to 27 of 32. Treatment with LWAS resulted in statistically significant reductions in the first peak EKAM (P = .005), the second peak EKAM (P = .01), and the KAAI (P = .03). However, among trials in which the control treatment was control shoes, the LWAS showed no associations on the first peak EKAM (P = .10) or the KAAI (P =  .06); among trials in which the control treatment was neutral insoles, the LWAS showed no associations on the second peak EKAM (P = .21) or the KAAI (P = .23). At the same time, the LWAS showed no statistically significant reduction on the first peak EKAM (P = .39) when compared with flat insoles.

CONCLUSION

Although meta-analysis outcomes of all studies indicated statistically significant associations between LWAS and reductions of the first peak EKAM, second peak EKAM and KAAI in people with medial knee OA while walking, different results existed in subgroups using various control conditions for comparison. These findings do not support the use of LWAS insoles for reducing knee load. An optimal LWAS treatment should provide the appropriate height of arch support and amount of lateral wedging. Further research should investigate the best combination of these 2 parameters to achieve efficacy without altered comfort.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估外侧楔形足弓支撑鞋垫(LWAS)与适当对照相比,对减轻内侧膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者膝关节负荷的即时效果。

方法

检索了包括Medline、EMBASE、Web of Science、Wiley Online Library、Cochrane图书馆和谷歌学术在内的数据库,检索时间范围从最早可用日期至2016年10月31日,对研究日期和语言无限制。纳入的研究必须旨在减轻膝关节负荷且有适当对照。主要测量值为第一和第二峰值膝关节内收外力矩(EKAM)以及膝关节内收角冲量(KAAI)。采用随机效应模型分析符合条件的研究。

结果

9项研究符合纳入标准,共有356名参与者,其中337人接受了LWAS治疗。方法学偏倚风险评分(质量指数)在32分中的范围为21至27分。LWAS治疗导致第一峰值EKAM(P = 0.005)、第二峰值EKAM(P = 0.01)和KAAI(P = 0.03)有统计学意义的降低。然而,在对照治疗为对照鞋的试验中,LWAS在第一峰值EKAM(P = 0.10)或KAAI(P = 0.06)方面未显示出相关性;在对照治疗为中性鞋垫的试验中,LWAS在第二峰值EKAM(P = 0.21)或KAAI(P = 0.23)方面未显示出相关性。同时,与平底鞋垫相比,LWAS在第一峰值EKAM方面未显示出统计学意义的降低(P = 0.39)。

结论

尽管所有研究的荟萃分析结果表明,LWAS与内侧膝关节OA患者行走时第一峰值EKAM、第二峰值EKAM和KAAI的降低之间存在统计学意义的相关性,但在使用不同对照条件进行比较的亚组中存在不同结果。这些发现不支持使用LWAS鞋垫来减轻膝关节负荷。最佳的LWAS治疗应提供适当的足弓支撑高度和外侧楔形量。进一步的研究应调查这两个参数的最佳组合,以在不改变舒适度的情况下实现疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ab2/5478338/837e994bda89/medi-96-e7168-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验