Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.
J Public Health Policy. 2017 Aug;38(3):303-313. doi: 10.1057/s41271-017-0078-8.
We assessed compliance of waterpipe product packaging and labelling with the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control's Article 11. We evaluated samples collected at a trade fair against ten domains: health warning location, size, use of pictorials, use of colour, and packaging information on constituents and emissions. We also evaluated waterpipe accessories (e.g., charcoal) for misleading claims. Ten of 15 tobacco products had health warnings on their principal display areas, covering a median of 22.4 per cent (interquartile range 19.4-27.4 per cent) of those areas. Three had pictorial, in-colour health warnings. We judged all packaging information on constituents and emissions to be misleading. Eight of 13 charcoal products displayed environmentally friendly descriptors and/or claims of reduced harm that we judged to be misleading. Increased compliance with waterpipe tobacco regulation is warranted. An improved policy framework for waterpipe tobacco should also consider regulation of accessories such as charcoal products.
我们评估了水烟产品包装和标签是否符合《烟草控制框架公约》第 11 条的规定。我们根据十个方面评估了在一次博览会上收集的样本:健康警告位置、大小、使用图片、使用颜色以及成分和排放的包装信息。我们还评估了水烟配件(如木炭)是否有误导性声明。在 15 种烟草产品中有 10 种在其主要展示区域有健康警告,占这些区域的中位数为 22.4%(四分位间距为 19.4-27.4%)。其中三种有彩色图片健康警告。我们认为所有关于成分和排放的包装信息都是具有误导性的。在 13 种木炭产品中有 8 种展示了我们认为具有误导性的环保描述符和/或降低危害的声明。需要加强对水烟烟草的监管。一个改进的水烟烟草政策框架也应该考虑对木炭等配件的监管。