Suppr超能文献

布洛芬预防高原头痛的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of ibuprofen on prevention of high altitude headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Xiong Juan, Lu Hui, Wang Rong, Jia Zhengping

机构信息

Key Laboratory of the plateau of the environmental damage control, Lanzhou General Hospital of Lanzhou Military Command, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jun 20;12(6):e0179788. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179788. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Ibuprofen is used to prevent high altitude headache (HAH) but its efficacy remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized, placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) of ibuprofen for the prevention of HAH.

METHODS

Studies reporting efficacy of ibuprofen for prevention of HAH were identified by searching electronic databases (until December 2016). The primary outcome was the difference in incidence of HAH between ibuprofen and placebo groups. Risk ratios (RR) were aggregated using a Mantel-Haenszel random effect model. Heterogeneity of included trials was assessed using the I2 statistics.

RESULTS

In three randomized-controlled clinical trials involving 407 subjects, HAH occurred in 101 of 239 subjects (42%) who received ibuprofen and 96 of 168 (57%) who received placebo (RR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.96, Z = 2.43, P = 0.02, I2 = 0%). The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 15%. Number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent HAH was 7. Similarly, The incidence of severe HAH was significant in the two groups (RR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.93, Z = 2.14, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). Severe HAH occurred in 3% treated with ibuprofen and 10% with placebo. The ARR was 8%. NNT to prevent severe HAH was 13. Headache severity using a visual analogue scale was not different between ibuprofen and placebo. Similarly, the difference between the two groups in the change in SpO2 from baseline to altitude was not different. One included RCT reported one participant with black stools and three participants with stomach pain in the ibuprofen group, while seven participants reported stomach pain in the placebo group.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on a limited number of studies ibuprofen seems efficacious for the prevention of HAH and may therefore represent an alternative for preventing HAH with acetazolamide or dexamethasone.

摘要

目的

布洛芬用于预防高原头痛(HAH),但其疗效仍存在争议。我们对布洛芬预防HAH的随机、安慰剂对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

通过检索电子数据库(截至2016年12月)确定报告布洛芬预防HAH疗效的研究。主要结局是布洛芬组和安慰剂组之间HAH发病率的差异。使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型汇总风险比(RR)。采用I²统计量评估纳入试验的异质性。

结果

在三项涉及407名受试者的随机对照临床试验中,239名接受布洛芬治疗的受试者中有101名(42%)发生HAH,168名接受安慰剂治疗的受试者中有96名(57%)发生HAH(RR = 0.79,95%CI 0.66至0.96,Z = 2.43,P = 0.02,I² = 0%)。绝对风险降低(ARR)为15%。预防HAH所需治疗人数(NNT)为7。同样,两组中重度HAH的发病率有显著差异(RR = 0.40,95%CI 0.17至0.93,Z = 2.14,P = 0.03,I² = 0%)。布洛芬治疗组中重度HAH的发生率为3%,安慰剂组为10%。ARR为8%。预防重度HAH的NNT为13。布洛芬组和安慰剂组使用视觉模拟量表评估的头痛严重程度无差异。同样,两组从基线到高原时SpO₂变化的差异也无统计学意义。一项纳入的RCT报告,布洛芬组有1名受试者出现黑便,3名受试者出现胃痛,而安慰剂组有7名受试者出现胃痛。

结论

基于有限数量的研究,布洛芬似乎对预防HAH有效,因此可能是用乙酰唑胺或地塞米松预防HAH的一种替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/62ff/5478153/cb91e7753649/pone.0179788.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验