Suppr超能文献

心理健康特定支持性住宿服务中有效实践的意图与经验:一项定性访谈研究

Intentions and experiences of effective practice in mental health specific supported accommodation services: a qualitative interview study.

作者信息

Sandhu Sima, Priebe Stefan, Leavey Gerard, Harrison Isobel, Krotofil Joanna, McPherson Peter, Dowling Sarah, Arbuthnott Maurice, Curtis Sarah, King Michael, Shepherd Geoff, Killaspy Helen

机构信息

Unit for Social and Community Psychiatry, WHO Collaborative Centre for Mental Health Services Development, Queen Mary University of London, Newham Centre for Mental Health, London, E13 8SP, UK.

Bamford Centre for Mental Health & Wellbeing, University of Ulster, Derry, Northern Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):471. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2411-0.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Deinstitutionalisation in Europe has led to the development of community-based accommodation for people with mental health problems. The type, setting, and intensity of support provided vary and the costs are substantial. Yet, despite the large investment in these services, there is little clarity on their aims and outcomes or how they are regarded by staff and the clients.

METHODS

We interviewed 30 staff and 30 clients from the three main types of supported accommodation in England (residential care, supported housing, floating outreach) to explore their perspectives on the purpose of these services, and the components of care considered most helpful. The interviews were coded and analysed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

There were generally consistent understandings amongst clients and staff across service types on the goals and purposes of supported accommodation services as: building independence and confidence; supporting people with their mental health; and providing safety and stability. We also noted a competing theme of anxiety about the continuity of support when clients move on from a service. Themes on the experience of what aided effective practice centred on: the supportive presence of others; incremental steps to progress; working together to avoid deskilling and dependency; feeling known and personally understood; tailoring support for social and community engagement; and building confidence through encouragement.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings provide an understanding of the commonalities in service approach, and goals of clients in these services, as well as the facilitators of goal attainment. However, they also highlight a common tension between providing safe and supportive living environments, whilst also promoting independence and facilitating rehabilitative change.

摘要

背景

欧洲的非机构化导致了为有心理健康问题的人提供基于社区的住宿服务的发展。所提供支持的类型、环境和强度各不相同,成本也很高。然而,尽管在这些服务上投入巨大,但对于其目标和成果,以及工作人员和服务对象如何看待它们,却几乎没有明确的认识。

方法

我们采访了英格兰三种主要类型的支持性住宿服务(寄宿照料、支持性住房、流动外展服务)中的30名工作人员和30名服务对象,以探讨他们对这些服务目的的看法,以及他们认为最有帮助的护理要素。访谈采用主题分析法进行编码和分析。

结果

不同服务类型的服务对象和工作人员对支持性住宿服务的目标和目的普遍有一致的理解,即:培养独立性和自信心;为有心理健康问题的人提供支持;提供安全和稳定的环境。我们还注意到一个相互矛盾的主题,即服务对象离开某项服务时,对支持的连续性感到焦虑。关于有助于有效实践的体验的主题集中在:他人的支持陪伴;逐步取得进展;共同努力以避免技能退化和依赖;被了解和得到个人理解;为社会和社区参与量身定制支持;以及通过鼓励建立信心。

结论

研究结果有助于理解这些服务在服务方式、服务对象目标方面的共性,以及实现目标的促进因素。然而,这些结果也凸显了在提供安全和支持性居住环境的同时,促进独立性和推动康复改变之间的常见矛盾。

相似文献

2

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验