Morales-Perez Arcadio, Nava-Aguilera Elizabeth, Legorreta-Soberanis José, Paredes-Solís Sergio, Balanzar-Martínez Alejandro, Serrano-de Los Santos Felipe René, Ríos-Rivera Claudia Erika, García-Leyva Jaime, Ledogar Robert J, Cockcroft Anne, Andersson Neil
Centro de Investigación de Enfermedades Tropicales (CIET), Universidad Autónoma de Guerrero, Acapulco, Mexico.
CIETinternational, New York, NY, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 30;17(Suppl 1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4300-1.
Community mobilisation for prevention requires engagement with and buy in from those communities. In the Mexico state of Guerrero, unprecedented social violence related to the narcotics trade has eroded most community structures. A recent randomised controlled trial in 90 coastal communities achieved sufficient mobilisation to reduce conventional vector density indicators, self-reported dengue illness and serologically proved dengue virus infection.
The Camino Verde intervention was a participatory research protocol promoting local discussion of baseline evidence and co-design of vector control solutions. Training of facilitators emphasised community authorship rather than trying to convince communities to do specific activities. Several discussion groups in each intervention community generated a loose and evolving prevention plan. Facilitators trained brigadistas, the first wave of whom received a small monthly stipend. Increasing numbers of volunteers joined the effort without pay. All communities opted to work with schoolchildren and for house-to-house visits by brigadístas. Children joined the neighbourhood vector control movements where security conditions permitted. After 6 months, a peer evaluation involved brigadista visits between intervention communities to review and to share progress.
Although most communities had no active social institutions at the outset, local action planning using survey data provided a starting point for community authorship. Well-known in their own communities, brigadistas faced little security risk compared with the facilitators who visited the communities, or with governmental programmes. We believe the training focus on evidence-based dialogue and a plural community ownership through multiple design groups were key to success under challenging security conditions.
ISRCTN27581154 .
社区动员预防需要社区的参与和支持。在墨西哥格雷罗州,与毒品贸易相关的前所未有的社会暴力侵蚀了大多数社区结构。最近在90个沿海社区进行的一项随机对照试验实现了足够的动员,以降低传统病媒密度指标、自我报告的登革热疾病以及血清学证实的登革热病毒感染。
“绿色之路”干预措施是一项参与性研究方案,促进当地对基线证据的讨论以及病媒控制解决方案的共同设计。对协调员的培训强调社区自主性,而不是试图说服社区开展特定活动。每个干预社区的几个讨论小组制定了一个松散且不断演变的预防计划。协调员培训了社区工作者,第一批社区工作者每月领取少量津贴。越来越多的志愿者无偿加入这项工作。所有社区都选择与学童合作,并让社区工作者进行挨家挨户的走访。在安全条件允许的情况下,孩子们加入了邻里病媒控制行动。6个月后,进行了一次同行评估,包括社区工作者在干预社区之间走访,以审查和分享进展情况。
尽管大多数社区一开始并没有活跃的社会机构,但利用调查数据进行的地方行动计划为社区自主性提供了一个起点。社区工作者在自己的社区中广为人知,与走访社区的协调员或政府项目相比,他们面临的安全风险较小。我们认为,在具有挑战性的安全条件下,培训聚焦于循证对话以及通过多个设计小组实现多元社区所有权是成功的关键。
ISRCTN27581154 。