Chen Yan, Wang Xue, Zhou Chuan-Di, Wu Qiang
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital, Shanghai 200233, China.
Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated First People's Hospital, Shanghai 200080, China.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 18;10(6):914-918. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2017.06.13. eCollection 2017.
To evaluate the impact of spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses on the postoperative visual quality of age-related cataract patients using Optical Quality Analysis System (OQAS).
Seventy-four eyes with age-related cataracts were randomly divided into spherical and aspherical lens implantation groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured preoperatively, one day, one week, two weeks, one month and two months after surgery. A biometric systems analysis using the OQAS objective scattering index (OSI) was performed.
There were no significant differences in visual acuity (>0.05) before and after spherical and aspheric lens implantation. There was a negative linear correction between the OSI value and BCVA (=-0.634, =0.000), and positive corrections between the OSI value and the lens LOCUS III value of nucleus color (NC), nucleus opacity (NO), cortex (C) and posterior lens capsular (P) (=0.704, =0.000; =0.514, =0.000; =0.276, =0.020; =0.417, =0.000, respectively). OSI values of spherical aspherical lenses were 11.5±3.6 11.8±3.4, 4.1±0.9 3.3±0.8, 3.5±0.9 2.7±0.7, 3.3±0.8 2.6±0.7, 3.2±0.7 2.5±0.8, and 3.2±0.8 2.5±0.8 before and 1d, 1, 2wk, 1 and 2mo after surgery, respectively. All time points varied significantly (<0.01) between the two groups.
Aspherical IOLs does not significantly affect visual acuity compared with spherical IOLs. The OSI value, was significantly lower in the aspherical lens group compared with the spherical lens. This study shows that objective visual quality of aspheric IOLs is better than that of the spherical lens by means of OQAS biological measurement method.
使用光学质量分析系统(OQAS)评估球面和非球面人工晶状体对年龄相关性白内障患者术后视觉质量的影响。
将74只年龄相关性白内障患眼随机分为球面晶状体植入组和非球面晶状体植入组。术前、术后1天、1周、2周、1个月和2个月测量最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。使用OQAS客观散射指数(OSI)进行生物测量系统分析。
球面和非球面晶状体植入前后视力无显著差异(>0.05)。OSI值与BCVA呈负线性相关(=-0.634,=0.000),OSI值与晶状体核颜色(NC)、核混浊度(NO)、皮质(C)和后囊膜(P)的晶状体位置III值呈正相关(分别为=0.704,=0.000;=0.514,=0.000;=0.276,=0.020;=0.417,=0.000)。术前及术后1天、1周、2周、1个月和2个月时,球面和非球面晶状体的OSI值分别为11.5±3.6和11.8±3.4、4.1±0.9和3.3±0.8、3.5±0.9和2.7±0.7、3.3±0.8和2.6±0.7、3.2±0.7和2.5±0.8、3.2±0.8和2.5±0.8。两组在所有时间点均有显著差异(<0.01)。
与球面人工晶状体相比,非球面人工晶状体对视力无显著影响。非球面晶状体组的OSI值显著低于球面晶状体组。本研究表明,通过OQAS生物测量方法,非球面人工晶状体的客观视觉质量优于球面晶状体。