• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三种通用型牙本质粘结剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性:一项体外研究。

The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.

Department of General Dentistry, Medical University of Lodz, 90-419 Lodz, Poland.

出版信息

Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.

DOI:10.3390/ijms21113950
PMID:32486393
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7312029/
Abstract

Dental universal adhesives are considered an useful tool in modern dentistry as they can be used in different etching techniques, allow for simplified protocol and provide sufficient bond strength. However, there is still no consensus as to their toxicity towards pulp. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of three universal adhesives: OptiBond Universal, Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese in an in vitro experimental model, monocyte/macrophage cell line SC (ATCC CRL-9855). The cytotoxicity was measured by means of XTT assay, whereas the genotoxicity (comet assay) was evaluated based on the percentage of DNA present in the comet tail. Furthermore, the ability of the adhesives to induce apoptosis was analyzed using flow cytometry (FC) with the FITC annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) double staining. The analysis of the cell cycle progression was performed with FC using PI staining. OptiBond Universal presented significant, while Prime&Bond Universal and Adhese Universal had minimal cytotoxicity and genotoxicity towards human SC cells. Moreover, only OptiBond Universal increased the level of apoptosis in SC cell line. None of the adhesives showed significant cell cycle arrest, as revealed by FC analysis. Due to substantial differences in toxicity in in vitro studies of dental adhesives, there is a great need for further research in order to establish more reliable test protocols allowing for standardized methodology.

摘要

牙科通用型粘结剂被认为是现代牙科的有用工具,因为它们可用于不同的蚀刻技术,简化了方案并提供了足够的粘结强度。然而,对于它们对牙髓的毒性,目前仍没有共识。因此,本研究旨在评估三种通用粘结剂(OptiBond Universal、Prime&Bond Universal 和 Adhese)在体外实验模型(单核细胞/巨噬细胞系 SC [ATCC CRL-9855])中的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。通过 XTT 测定法测量细胞毒性,而通过彗星试验评估遗传毒性(彗星试验),根据彗星尾部存在的 DNA 百分比进行评估。此外,使用 FITC Annexin V/碘化丙啶(PI)双重染色通过流式细胞术(FC)分析粘结剂诱导细胞凋亡的能力。使用 PI 染色通过 FC 分析细胞周期进程。OptiBond Universal 对人 SC 细胞具有显著的细胞毒性和遗传毒性,而 Prime&Bond Universal 和 Adhese Universal 具有最小的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。此外,只有 OptiBond Universal 增加了 SC 细胞系中的细胞凋亡水平。FC 分析显示,没有一种粘结剂显示出明显的细胞周期停滞。由于牙科粘结剂的体外研究中存在实质性的毒性差异,因此需要进一步研究,以建立更可靠的测试方案,允许采用标准化的方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/6f9a58c59f6c/ijms-21-03950-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/eb8ecd1d3b32/ijms-21-03950-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/b8f7107627fb/ijms-21-03950-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/9341298196d1/ijms-21-03950-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/6f9a58c59f6c/ijms-21-03950-g004a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/eb8ecd1d3b32/ijms-21-03950-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/b8f7107627fb/ijms-21-03950-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/9341298196d1/ijms-21-03950-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32aa/7312029/6f9a58c59f6c/ijms-21-03950-g004a.jpg

相似文献

1
The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Three Dental Universal Adhesives-An In Vitro Study.三种通用型牙本质粘结剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性:一项体外研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 May 31;21(11):3950. doi: 10.3390/ijms21113950.
2
Effect of double-layer application on bond quality of adhesive systems.双层涂敷对黏结系统黏结质量的影响。
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018 Jan;77:501-509. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2017.10.008. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Enamel bond strengths of pairs of adhesives from the same manufacturer.来自同一制造商的成对粘合剂的牙釉质粘结强度。
Oper Dent. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):492-9.
4
Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives?对抗衰老:通用粘合剂用于牙本质粘结的期望?
J Dent. 2016 Feb;45:43-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.11.008. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
5
Comparison of bonding performance of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives on human dentin using reliability analysis.使用可靠性分析比较自酸蚀和酸蚀冲洗粘结剂对人牙本质的粘结性能。
J Adhes Dent. 2008 Dec;10(6):423-9.
6
The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study.通用牙科粘合剂的毒性:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;13(16):2653. doi: 10.3390/polym13162653.
7
Microtensile vs microshear bond strength of all-in-one adhesives to unground enamel.一体式粘接剂对未打磨牙釉质的微拉伸与微剪切粘接强度。
J Adhes Dent. 2010 Dec;12(6):427-33. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a18237.
8
Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine--Old wine in new bottles?通用粘结剂与牙本质的粘结——新瓶装旧酒?
J Dent. 2015 May;43(5):525-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2015.03.004. Epub 2015 Mar 20.
9
Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional, one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems.使用传统、一步法和自酸蚀粘结系统时复合材料与牙本质的粘结强度。
J Dent. 2001 Jan;29(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(00)00049-x.
10
[Curing mode of universal adhesives affects the bond strength of resin cements to dentin].通用粘结剂的固化方式对树脂水门汀与牙本质的粘结强度有影响
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2017 Feb 18;49(1):101-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Post-Process Cytotoxicity of Resins in Clear Aligner Fabrication.隐形矫治器制作中树脂的后处理细胞毒性
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Jun 26;17(13):1776. doi: 10.3390/polym17131776.
2
Effects of Adding Tricalcium Silicate Nanoparticles to the Universal G2 Bond Adhesive as Self-Etch Mode on the Shear Bond Strength to the Orthodontic Bracket.纳米三氧化二硅添加到通用 G2 粘结剂中作为自酸蚀模式对正畸托槽剪切粘结强度的影响。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2024 Dec;10(6):e948. doi: 10.1002/cre2.948.
3
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of bioceramic root canal sealers compared to conventional resin-based sealer.

本文引用的文献

1
Bonding Strength of Universal Adhesives to Indirect Substrates: A Meta-Analysis of in Vitro Studies.通用黏合剂与间接基底黏结强度的荟萃分析:体外研究的系统评价。
J Prosthodont. 2020 Apr;29(4):298-308. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13147. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
2
Influence of different application protocols of universal adhesive system on the clinical behavior of Class I and II restorations of composite resin - a randomized and double-blind controlled clinical trial.通用粘结剂系统不同应用方案对复合树脂Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类修复体临床效果的影响:一项随机、双盲对照临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2019 Nov 21;19(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12903-019-0913-3.
3
与传统树脂基根管封闭剂相比,生物陶瓷根管封闭剂的细胞毒性和遗传毒性
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 19;14(1):4124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54726-1.
4
Considerations about Cytotoxicity of Resin-Based Composite Dental Materials: A Systematic Review.关于树脂基复合材料牙科材料细胞毒性的思考:系统评价。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Dec 21;25(1):152. doi: 10.3390/ijms25010152.
5
Risk Factors with Porcelain Laminate Veneers Experienced during Cementation: A Review.瓷贴面粘结过程中遇到的风险因素:综述
Materials (Basel). 2023 Jul 10;16(14):4932. doi: 10.3390/ma16144932.
6
The Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Bioactive Dental Materials.生物活性牙科材料的细胞毒性和遗传毒性。
Cells. 2022 Oct 15;11(20):3238. doi: 10.3390/cells11203238.
7
The Toxicity of Universal Dental Adhesives: An In Vitro Study.通用牙科粘合剂的毒性:一项体外研究。
Polymers (Basel). 2021 Aug 10;13(16):2653. doi: 10.3390/polym13162653.
8
Clinical Effectiveness of Bulk-Fill and Conventional Resin Composite Restorations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.大容量充填与传统树脂复合材料修复的临床疗效:系统评价与Meta分析
Polymers (Basel). 2020 Aug 10;12(8):1786. doi: 10.3390/polym12081786.
Evaluation of gap formation at the composite resin-tooth interface after using universal adhesives: In vitro SEM study using the replica technique.
使用通用粘结剂后复合树脂与牙齿界面间隙形成的评估:采用复型技术的体外扫描电子显微镜研究
Microsc Res Tech. 2020 Feb;83(2):176-185. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23400. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
4
Three-year clinical evaluation of universal adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.通用粘结剂用于非龋性颈部病变的三年临床评估
Am J Dent. 2019 Oct;32(5):223-228.
5
Cytotoxicity of universal dental adhesive systems: Assessment in vitro assays on human gingival fibroblasts.通用型牙科黏接剂系统的细胞毒性:体外评估对人牙龈成纤维细胞的影响。
Toxicol In Vitro. 2019 Oct;60:252-260. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
Universal Adhesives: Setting Characteristics and Reactivity with Dentin.通用粘合剂:凝固特性及与牙本质的反应性
Materials (Basel). 2019 May 27;12(10):1720. doi: 10.3390/ma12101720.
7
Different surface modifications combined with universal adhesives: the impact on the bonding properties of zirconia to composite resin cement.不同表面改性处理联合通用型黏结剂:对氧化锆与复合树脂水门汀黏结性能的影响。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Nov;23(11):3941-3950. doi: 10.1007/s00784-019-02825-z. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
8
Flow Cytometry Analysis of Antibacterial Effects of Universal Dentin Bonding Agents on .流式细胞术分析通用牙本质粘结剂对 的抗菌效果。
Molecules. 2019 Feb 1;24(3):532. doi: 10.3390/molecules24030532.
9
Universal dental adhesives: Current status, laboratory testing, and clinical performance.通用牙科胶粘剂:现状、实验室测试和临床性能。
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2019 Aug;107(6):2121-2131. doi: 10.1002/jbm.b.34305. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
10
In vitro cytotoxicity of dental adhesives: A systematic review.牙本质粘接剂的体外细胞毒性:系统评价。
Dent Mater. 2019 Feb;35(2):195-205. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.11.028. Epub 2018 Dec 4.