Rodermel S R, Bogorad L
Genetics. 1987 May;116(1):127-39. doi: 10.1093/genetics/116.1.127.
The nucleotide sequences of the maize plastid genes for the alpha subunit of CF1 (atpA) and the proteolipid subunit of CF0 (atpH) are presented. The evolution of these genes among higher plants is characterized by a transition mutation bias of about 2:1 and by rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution which are much lower than similar rates for genes from other sources. This is consistent with the notion that the plastid genome is evolving conservatively in primary sequence. Yet, the mode and tempo of sequence evolution of these and other plastid-encoded coupling factor genes are not the same. In particular, higher rates of nonsynonymous substitution in atpE (the gene for the epsilon subunit of CF1) and higher rates of synonymous substitution in atpH in the dicot vs. monocot lineages of higher plants indicate that these sequences are likely subject to different evolutionary constraints in these two lineages. The 5'- and 3'-transcribed flanking regions of atpA and atpH from maize, wheat and tobacco are conserved in size, but contain few putative regulatory elements which are conserved either in their spatial arrangement or sequence complexity. However, these regions likely contain variable numbers of "species-specific" regulatory elements. The present studies thus suggest that the plastid genome is not a passive participant in an evolutionary process governed by a more rapidly changing, readily adaptive, nuclear compartment, but that novel strategies for the coordinate expression of genes in the plastid genome may arise through rapid evolution of the flanking sequences of these genes.
本文给出了玉米质体基因CF1的α亚基(atpA)和CF0的蛋白脂质亚基(atpH)的核苷酸序列。这些基因在高等植物中的进化具有约2:1的转换突变偏向性,其同义替换率和非同义替换率远低于其他来源基因的类似比率。这与质体基因组在一级序列上保守进化的观点一致。然而,这些以及其他质体编码的偶联因子基因的序列进化模式和速度并不相同。特别是,在高等植物的双子叶植物和单子叶植物谱系中,atpE(CF1的ε亚基基因)的非同义替换率较高,而atpH的同义替换率较高,这表明这些序列在这两个谱系中可能受到不同的进化限制。玉米、小麦和烟草的atpA和atpH的5'和3'转录侧翼区域在大小上是保守的,但几乎没有在空间排列或序列复杂性上保守的假定调控元件。然而,这些区域可能包含数量可变的“物种特异性”调控元件。因此,目前的研究表明,质体基因组并非是由变化更快、易于适应的细胞核所主导的进化过程中的被动参与者,而是质体基因组中基因的协调表达可能通过这些基因侧翼序列的快速进化产生新的策略。