Lei Jianqin, Durbin Mary K, Shi Yue, Uji Akihito, Balasubramanian Siva, Baghdasaryan Elmira, Al-Sheikh Mayss, Sadda Srinivas R
Doheny Image Reading Center, Doheny Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California.
Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles).
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct 1;135(10):1092-1098. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.3431.
The repeatability and reproducibility of quantitative metrics from optical coherence tomographic angiography (OCTA) must be assessed before these data can be confidently interpreted in clinical research and practice.
To evaluate the repeatability and reproducibility of OCTA-derived retinal vascular quantitative metrics.
DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: In this cross-sectional study, 21 healthy volunteers (42 eyes) and 22 patients with retinal disease (22 eyes), including 14 with age-related macular degeneration, 3 with epiretinal membrane, 2 with diabetic retinopathy, 2 with myopic macular degeneration, and 1 with retinal vein occlusion, were enrolled. Participants were recruited from September 1 through November 31, 2016. Each eye underwent 3 repeated scans with 3 instruments for a total of 9 acquisitions. Eyes were randomly assigned to scanning with a 3 × 3-mm or 6 × 6-mm pattern. Eyes were excluded from subsequent analysis if any acquisition had a signal strength of less than 7. Repeatability (defined as the agreement in measurements within a device) and reproducibility (defined as the agreement between devices of the same type) were assessed by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation.
All eyes underwent scanning using 3 separate devices.
Vessel length density (VLD) and perfusion density (PD) of the superficial retinal vasculature.
A total of 21 healthy volunteers (8 men and 13 women; mean [SD] age, 36 [6] years) and 22 patients with retinal disease (15 men and 7 women; mean [SD] age, 79 [9] years) underwent evaluation. Of these, 40 of 42 normal eyes and 15 of 22 eyes with retinal disease met signal strength criteria and were included in this analysis. The ICC among the 3 consecutive scans ranged from 0.82 to 0.98 for VLD and from 0.83 to 0.95 for PD. The coefficient of variation (CV) ranged from 2.2% to 5.9% for VLD and from 2.4% to 5.9% for PD. For reproducibility, the ICC ranged from 0.62 to 0.95 and the CV was less than 6% in all groups. The agreement was highest for the 3 × 3-mm pattern in the inner ring (ICC range, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.85-0.96] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]) and 6 × 6-mm pattern in the outer ring (ICC range, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.86-0.97] to 0.96 [95% CI, 0.92-0.98]).
Vessel length density and PD of the superficial retinal vasculature can be obtained from OCTA images with high levels of repeatability and reproducibility but can vary with scan pattern and location.
在光学相干断层扫描血管造影(OCTA)数据能够在临床研究和实践中得到可靠解释之前,必须评估其定量指标的可重复性和再现性。
评估OCTA衍生的视网膜血管定量指标的可重复性和再现性。
设计、设置和参与者:在这项横断面研究中,招募了21名健康志愿者(42只眼)和22名视网膜疾病患者(22只眼),其中包括14例年龄相关性黄斑变性患者、3例视网膜前膜患者、2例糖尿病性视网膜病变患者、2例近视性黄斑变性患者和1例视网膜静脉阻塞患者。参与者于2016年9月1日至11月31日招募。每只眼睛使用3台仪器进行3次重复扫描,共采集9次图像。眼睛被随机分配以3×3毫米或6×6毫米模式进行扫描。如果任何一次采集的信号强度小于7,则将该眼睛排除在后续分析之外。通过组内相关系数(ICC)和变异系数评估可重复性(定义为同一设备内测量值的一致性)和再现性(定义为同一类型设备之间的一致性)。
所有眼睛均使用3台不同的设备进行扫描。
视网膜浅层血管的血管长度密度(VLD)和灌注密度(PD)。
共有21名健康志愿者(8名男性和13名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,36[6]岁)和22名视网膜疾病患者(15名男性和7名女性;平均[标准差]年龄,79[9]岁)接受了评估。其中,42只正常眼中的40只和22只视网膜疾病眼中的15只符合信号强度标准,并纳入本分析。3次连续扫描之间的ICC,VLD为0.82至0.98,PD为0.83至0.95。VLD的变异系数(CV)为2.2%至5.9%,PD的变异系数为2.4%至5.9%。对于再现性,ICC范围为0.62至0.95,所有组的CV均小于6%。在内环的3×3毫米模式(ICC范围,0.92[95%CI,0.85 - 0.96]至0.96[95%CI,0.93 - 0.98])和外环的6×6毫米模式(ICC范围,0.93[95%CI,0.86 - 0.97]至0.96[95%CI,0.92 - 0.98])中一致性最高。
视网膜浅层血管的血管长度密度和灌注密度可从OCTA图像中以高度的可重复性和再现性获得,但会因扫描模式和位置而有所不同。