Najafi Zohre, Zakeri Hossien, Mirhaghi Amir
Department of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences, Torbat Heydariyeh, Iran.
Emergency Medicine, Hasheminejad Hospital, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jan;36:27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2017.08.003. Epub 2017 Sep 29.
Prompt identification of traumatic brain injury (TBI) is vital for patients in critical condition; however, it is not clear which acuity scoring tools are associated with short-term mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of acuity scoring tools and 24-h mortality among TBI patients in both prehospital and hospital settings.
This study was an observational, prospective cohort, in which patients with TBI were followed from the accident scene to the hospital. Vital signs and acuity scoring tools, including the Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), Shock Index (SI), Modified Shock Index (MSI) and Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS), were collected both on the scene as well as at the hospital. A logistic regression was performed to ascertain the effects of clinical parameters on the likelihood of survival of patients with TBI regarding 24-h mortality.
A total of 185 patients were included in this study. The mortality rate was 14% (25/185). The logistic regression model was statistically significant at χ=60.8, p=0.001. A hierarchical forward stepwise logistic regression analysis showed that age, hospital RTS and prehospital NEWS significantly improved mortality predictions. The model explained the 51.2% variance in survival of patients with TBI.
The NEWS and the RTS may be used to triage TBI patients for prehospital and hospital emergency care, respectively. Therefore, because traditional vital signs criteria may be of limited use for the triage of TBI patients, it is recommended that acuity scoring tools be used in such cases.
对于危重症患者,及时识别创伤性脑损伤(TBI)至关重要;然而,尚不清楚哪些急性病评分工具与短期死亡率相关。本研究的目的是确定急性病评分工具的准确性以及院前和院内环境下TBI患者的24小时死亡率。
本研究为观察性前瞻性队列研究,对TBI患者从事故现场到医院进行随访。收集现场和医院的生命体征以及急性病评分工具,包括修订创伤评分(RTS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、国家早期预警评分(NEWS)、休克指数(SI)、改良休克指数(MSI)和创伤与损伤严重程度评分(TRISS)。进行逻辑回归分析,以确定临床参数对TBI患者24小时死亡率生存可能性的影响。
本研究共纳入185例患者。死亡率为14%(25/185)。逻辑回归模型在χ=60.8,p=0.001时具有统计学意义。分层向前逐步逻辑回归分析表明,年龄、院内RTS和院前NEWS显著改善了死亡率预测。该模型解释了TBI患者生存差异的51.2%。
NEWS和RTS可分别用于院前和院内紧急护理中对TBI患者进行分诊。因此,由于传统生命体征标准在TBI患者分诊中可能作用有限,建议在这种情况下使用急性病评分工具。