Bapat Shweta S, Patel Harshali K, Sansgiry Sujit S
Pharmaceutical Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Houston, 3455 Cullen Boulevard, 112A Science and Research 2 Bldg, Houston, TX 77204, USA.
Amgen, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320, USA.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2017 Oct 16;5(4):57. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy5040057.
In this study, we evaluate the role of information anxiety and information load on the intention to read information from prescription drug information leaflets (PILs). These PILs were developed based on the principals of information load and consumer information processing. This was an experimental prospective repeated measures study conducted in the United States where 360 (62% response rate) university students (>18 years old) participated. Participants were presented with a scenario followed by exposure to the three drug product information sources used to operationalize information load. The three sources were: (i) current practice; (ii) pre-existing one-page text only; and (iii) interventional one-page prototype PILs designed for the study. Information anxiety was measured as anxiety experienced by the individual when encountering information. The outcome variable of intention to read PILs was defined as the likelihood that the patient will read the information provided in the leaflets. A survey questionnaire was used to capture the data and the objectives were analyzed by performing a repeated measures MANOVA using SAS version 9.3. When compared to current practice and one-page text only leaflets, one-page PILs had significantly lower scores on information anxiety ( 0.001) and information load ( 0.001). The intention to read was highest and significantly different ( 0.001) for PILs as compared to current practice or text only leaflets. Information anxiety and information load significantly impacted intention to read ( 0.001). Newly developed PILs increased patient's intention to read and can help in improving the counseling services provided by pharmacists.
在本研究中,我们评估了信息焦虑和信息负荷对阅读处方药说明书(PILs)中信息意愿的影响。这些PILs是基于信息负荷和消费者信息处理原则制定的。这是一项在美国进行的实验性前瞻性重复测量研究,360名(回复率62%)18岁以上的大学生参与其中。参与者先面对一个场景,然后接触用于实现信息负荷的三种药品信息来源。这三种来源分别是:(i)当前做法;(ii)仅有的一页预先存在的文本;(iii)为该研究设计的干预性单页原型PILs。信息焦虑被衡量为个体在遇到信息时所体验到的焦虑。阅读PILs的意愿这一结果变量被定义为患者阅读传单中提供信息的可能性。使用调查问卷收集数据,并通过使用SAS 9.3版本进行重复测量多变量方差分析来分析目标。与当前做法和仅一页文本的传单相比,单页PILs在信息焦虑(P<0.001)和信息负荷(P<0.001)方面得分显著更低。与当前做法或仅文本的传单相比,PILs的阅读意愿最高且差异显著(P<0.001)。信息焦虑和信息负荷显著影响阅读意愿(P<0.001)。新开发的PILs提高了患者的阅读意愿,并有助于改善药剂师提供的咨询服务。