Shiff Clive
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2017 Oct 26;11(10):e0005812. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005812. eCollection 2017 Oct.
Schistosomiasis has been of concern to local health authorities for most of the last century, and in spite of a lack of effective chemotherapy, the disease was dealt with quite effectively in many endemic countries by snail control and environmental management [1]. Much of this work was reported in journals prior to the electronic era but, sadly, seems to have been subsequently ignored. For many years, there followed a global hiatus on schistosomiasis control, and much of the local expertise was lost, but many things have changed more recently, mainly with the advent of generic and affordable praziquantel. With the increased availability of this drug, there has been an increasing interest in readdressing schistosomes as well as other neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). The strategic approach for this had been based almost exclusively on chemotherapy. Recently, however, questions arose about this strategy with evidence that chemotherapy alone was not succeeding [2]. Additional strategies were needed, and the "Towards Elimination of Schistosomiasis" (TES) 2017 Conference in Cameroon stressed an integrated PHASE strategy. This was in line with the WHO-NTD and WHO-AFRO 2014-2020 Regional Strategy on NTDs and directed emphasis on transmission control. Subsequently, this emphasis was discussed in a comprehensive review [3] that stressed the importance of such additions to any elimination programme. In reality, this means focusing on the aquatic snail hosts where and when transmission occurs, defining other risk factors such as water contact and latrine design and identifying improved sanitation and health education as essential components for elimination. For schistosomiasis reduction during the mid-20th century, transmission control was used extensively, but these facts are not well reported. Recent reviews have attempted to cover previous research [4,5], but sadly, they have left major knowledge gaps, particularly from Africa. These omissions also occurred in a recent WHO pamphlet on molluscicides [6]. Sadly, search engines used to retrieve information appear to miss much done by 5 African research institutes active from 1950 to 1990. It seems appropriate to take a look back to a time when fieldwork was a focus of research and transmission control was emphasised.
在上个世纪的大部分时间里,血吸虫病一直是当地卫生当局关注的问题。尽管缺乏有效的化疗方法,但在许多流行国家,通过控制钉螺和环境管理,该疾病得到了相当有效的控制[1]。这项工作的大部分内容在电子时代之前就已发表在期刊上,但遗憾的是,后来似乎被忽视了。多年来,全球范围内对血吸虫病控制出现了中断,许多当地的专业知识也因此流失。不过,最近情况发生了很大变化,主要是因为出现了通用且价格亲民的吡喹酮。随着这种药物的可及性增加,人们对重新应对血吸虫病以及其他被忽视的热带病(NTDs)的兴趣也日益浓厚。此前应对血吸虫病的战略几乎完全基于化疗。然而,最近有证据表明仅靠化疗并不成功,这引发了对该战略的质疑[2]。还需要其他策略,2017年在喀麦隆举行的“迈向消除血吸虫病”(TES)会议强调了综合PHASE战略。这与世界卫生组织(WHO)的被忽视热带病规划以及WHO非洲区域办事处2014 - 2020年被忽视热带病区域战略一致,并将重点放在传播控制上。随后,在一篇全面综述中对这一重点进行了讨论[3],该综述强调了这些补充措施对任何消除计划的重要性。实际上,这意味着要关注传播发生的地点和时间的水生钉螺宿主,确定其他风险因素,如水接触和厕所设计,并将改善环境卫生和健康教育确定为消除工作的重要组成部分。在20世纪中叶减少血吸虫病传播时,广泛采用了传播控制措施,但这些事实并未得到充分报道。最近的综述试图涵盖以往的研究[4,5],但遗憾的是,它们留下了重大的知识空白,尤其是来自非洲的知识空白。这些遗漏也出现在WHO最近一本关于杀螺剂的宣传册中[6]。遗憾的是,用于检索信息的搜索引擎似乎遗漏了1950年至1990年期间活跃的5个非洲研究机构所做的许多工作。回顾一个以实地调查为研究重点且强调传播控制的时期似乎是恰当的。