Myers Nicholas D, Park Sung Eun, Ahn Soyeon, Lee Seungmin, Sullivan Philip J, Feltz Deborah L
1 Michigan State University.
2 University of Miami.
J Sport Exerc Psychol. 2017 Aug 1;39(4):261-276. doi: 10.1123/jsep.2017-0155. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Coaching efficacy refers to the extent to which a coach believes that he or she has the capacity to affect the learning and performance of his or her athletes. The purpose of the current study was to empirically synthesize findings across the extant literature to estimate relationships between the proposed sources of coaching efficacy and each of the dimensions of coaching efficacy. A literature search yielded 20 studies and 278 effect size estimates that met the inclusion criteria. The overall relationship between the proposed sources of coaching efficacy and each dimension of coaching efficacy was positive and ranged from small to medium in size. Coach gender and level coached moderated the overall relationship between the proposed sources of coaching efficacy and each of the dimensions of coaching efficacy. Results from this meta-analysis provided some evidence for both the utility of, and possible revisions to, the conceptual model of coaching efficacy.
教练效能是指教练认为自己有能力影响其运动员学习和表现的程度。本研究的目的是通过实证综合现有文献中的研究结果，以估计所提出的教练效能来源与教练效能各维度之间的关系。文献检索得到了20项研究和278个符合纳入标准的效应量估计值。所提出的教练效能来源与教练效能各维度之间的总体关系是积极的，大小范围从小到中。教练性别和执教水平调节了所提出的教练效能来源与教练效能各维度之间的总体关系。这项元分析的结果为教练效能概念模型的效用和可能的修订提供了一些证据。
