Suppr超能文献

用于结直肠癌相关饮食因素的食物频率问卷的有效性和可重复性。

Validity and Reproducibility of a Food Frequency Questionnaire for Dietary Factors Related to Colorectal Cancer.

机构信息

Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, Ghent University, Coupure Link 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

Department of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Mekelle University, Mekelle 1871, Ethiopia.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2017 Nov 17;9(11):1257. doi: 10.3390/nu9111257.

Abstract

Dietary factors play a major role in the development of colorectal cancer. This study evaluated the reproducibility and validity of a 109-food item Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) to measure the consumption of foods and nutrients related to the development of colorectal cancer in a population aged ≥50 years in Flanders, Belgium. A semi-quantitative FFQ was administered two times in a period of two weeks to evaluate reproducibility (FFQ1 and FFQ2). The validity of the FFQ was assessed by comparing FFQ1 against the 3-day diary method (3 DD). A total of 162 respondents (mean age 57.5 years) provided data for the FFQ, of whom 156 also participated in the validity assessment. Mean differences in the intake of foods and nutrients between FFQ1 and FFQ2 were, overall, small and statistically insignificant. However, a higher estimation was observed by FFQ1 as compared to the 3-DD method for the majority of food groups and nutrient intake in the validity assessment. A systematic mean difference (g/day) was observed for eight food groups in the Bland-Altman agreement test; the largest was for fruit intake. Regarding the nutrients, a systematic mean difference was observed in calcium, fat, and vitamin D intake. Overall, the reproducibility of the FFQ was good, and its validity could be satisfactory for estimating absolute food and nutrient intakes and ranking individuals according to high and low intake categories.

摘要

饮食因素在结直肠癌的发展中起着重要作用。本研究评估了一种包含 109 种食物的食物频率问卷(FFQ)在测量比利时佛兰德地区≥50 岁人群中与结直肠癌发展相关的食物和营养素摄入量的重现性和有效性。半定量 FFQ 在两周内进行两次以评估重现性(FFQ1 和 FFQ2)。通过将 FFQ1 与 3 天日记法(3DD)进行比较来评估 FFQ 的有效性。共有 162 名受访者(平均年龄 57.5 岁)提供了 FFQ 的数据,其中 156 名受访者还参与了有效性评估。总体而言,FFQ1 和 FFQ2 之间食物和营养素摄入量的平均差异较小且无统计学意义。然而,在有效性评估中,与 3DD 方法相比,FFQ1 对大多数食物组和营养素摄入量的估计更高。在 Bland-Altman 一致性检验中,对 8 种食物组观察到系统的平均差异(g/天);水果摄入量最大。关于营养素,观察到钙、脂肪和维生素 D 摄入量的系统平均差异。总体而言,FFQ 的重现性良好,其有效性可以令人满意地估计绝对食物和营养素摄入量,并根据高摄入量和低摄入量类别对个体进行分类。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bbb9/5707729/4b9b0890bf97/nutrients-09-01257-g001a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验