Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
Department of Clinical Neurology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK.
Brain. 2018 Jan 1;141(1):48-54. doi: 10.1093/brain/awx288.
See Thiebaut de Schotten and Foulon (doi:10.1093/brain/awx332) for a scientific commentary on this article.Though consistency across the population renders the extraordinarily complex functional anatomy of the human brain surveyable, the inverse inference-from common functional maps to individual behaviour-is constrained by marked individual deviation from the population mean. Such inference is fundamental to the evaluation of therapeutic interventions in focal brain injury, where the impact of an induced structural change in the brain is quantified by its behavioural consequences, inevitably refracted through the lens of lesion-outcome relations. Current therapeutic evaluations do not incorporate inferences to the individual outcome derived from a detailed specification of the lesion anatomy, relying only on reductive parameters such as lesion volume and crudely discretised location. Examining 1172 patients with anatomically registered focal brain lesions, here we show that such low-dimensional models are highly insensitive to therapeutic effects. In contrast, high-dimensional models supported by machine learning dramatically improve sensitivity by leveraging complex individuating patterns in the functional architecture of the brain. The failure to replicate in humans positive interventional effects in experimental animals is thus revealed to have a remediable inferential cause, forcing a radical re-evaluation of therapeutic inference in the human brain.
见 Thiebaut de Schotten 和 Foulon(doi:10.1093/brain/awx332)对此文的科学评论。尽管人群中的一致性使得人类大脑极其复杂的功能解剖结构可以被观察到,但从常见的功能图谱推断到个体行为受到显著的个体偏差的限制,这种偏差偏离了群体平均值。这种推断对于局灶性脑损伤的治疗干预评估至关重要,因为脑内诱导的结构变化的影响通过其行为后果来量化,而这种影响不可避免地受到损伤-结果关系的影响。目前的治疗评估并没有将从病变解剖学详细说明中得出的个体结果推断纳入其中,只依赖于病变体积和粗略离散化位置等简化参数。通过检查 1172 名具有解剖学注册的局灶性脑损伤患者,我们在这里表明,这种低维模型对治疗效果的敏感性非常低。相比之下,机器学习支持的高维模型通过利用大脑功能结构中的复杂个体化模式,显著提高了敏感性。因此,在人类中未能复制实验动物的阳性干预效果被揭示具有可纠正的推理原因,这迫使人们对人类大脑中的治疗推理进行彻底重新评估。