1 Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xianga Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
2 China National Clinical Research Center on Mental Health Disorders (Xiangya), Changsha, Hunan, China.
Can J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb;63(2):115-128. doi: 10.1177/0706743717738493. Epub 2017 Nov 29.
To explore the effect of exercise on cognition in depression as well as the impact of potential moderators and intervention type.
Controlled and uncontrolled interventional studies that described an exercise intervention and cognitive outcomes in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) were included following a search of Pubmed, Ovid Medline, PsycInfo and Embase from inception to January 2017. Meta-analyses were conducted to calculate Hedges' g using a random-effects model. Meta-regression explored the relationships among age, baseline cognition, frequency and duration of exercise, and cognitive outcomes. Subgroup analyses were also conducted according to type and intensity of exercise interventions.
Of 12 controlled studies and 3 uncontrolled studies that met inclusion criteria, 9 (642 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. No significant effect of exercise was found on global cognition (Hedges' g = 0.08, P = 0.33, I = 0%) or on individual cognitive domains. Meta-regression analyses failed to find significant relationships among participant age, baseline cognition, number of exercise sessions per wk, duration of exercise per wk, total duration of exercise during the intervention, or improvement in global cognition. Interventions combining physical with cognitive activity significantly improved global cognition ( P = 0.048), whereas low-intensity interventions were also positive ( P = 0.048).
No impact of physical exercise was found on cognition in MDD overall. However, we found that interventions combining physical and cognitive activities had a positive impact, and that lower-intensity interventions, where adherence was improved, also impacted positively. There remains a lack of high-quality data in this population.
探讨运动对抑郁症认知功能的影响,以及潜在的调节因素和干预类型的影响。
检索 Pubmed、Ovid Medline、PsycInfo 和 Embase 从建库到 2017 年 1 月的数据,纳入描述运动干预和重性抑郁障碍(MDD)患者认知结局的对照和非对照干预研究。采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,计算 Hedges'g。采用元回归分析探讨年龄、基线认知、运动频率和持续时间与认知结局之间的关系。还根据运动干预的类型和强度进行亚组分析。
符合纳入标准的 12 项对照研究和 3 项非对照研究中,有 9 项(642 例患者)纳入荟萃分析。运动对总体认知(Hedges'g = 0.08,P = 0.33,I = 0%)或个别认知领域均无显著影响。元回归分析未能发现参与者年龄、基线认知、每周运动次数、每周运动持续时间、干预期间总运动时间或总体认知改善与认知结局之间存在显著关系。结合身体和认知活动的干预显著改善了总体认知(P = 0.048),而低强度干预也有积极影响(P = 0.048)。
总体而言,身体运动对 MDD 患者的认知功能没有影响。但是,我们发现结合身体和认知活动的干预有积极影响,而提高依从性的低强度干预也有积极影响。在这一人群中,仍然缺乏高质量的数据。