• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以组织学切片为金标准对三种电子根尖定位仪准确性的比较评估:一项研究。

A comparative evaluation of accuracy of three electronic apex locators using histological section as gold standard: An study.

作者信息

Saxena Divya, Saha Suparna Ganguly, Bharadwaj Anuj, Vijaywargiya Neelam, Dubey Sandeep, Kala Shubham

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dental Science and Hospital, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(4):251-254. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_175_16.

DOI:10.4103/JCD.JCD_175_16
PMID:29259362
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5721507/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present study was to comparatively evaluate the accuracy of iRoot, iPex II, and Propex pixi apex locator using histological sections as the gold standard.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients indicated for extraction of single-rooted permanent teeth with single canal system were selected. Working lengths (WLs) of teeth were determined using iRoot, iPex II, and Propex pixi. Teeth were then extracted, and the files were reintroduced to the anatomic apex to measure anatomic canal length (ACL) and fixed at the ACL using flowable composite. The apical 4 mm of the roots were longitudinally shaved away to visualize the canal under a stereomicroscope at ×24 magnification. Digital photographs were evaluated to measure the distance between the major diameter and minor diameter. Thus, the WL, that is, the minor diameter length (MDL) was ascertained.

RESULTS

Measurements of mean WLs within ±0.5 mm of minor diameter were 90% acceptable for iRoot, 86.66% for iPex II, and 80% for Propex pixi when compared with mean MDL as obtained from the histological sections.

CONCLUSIONS

All apex locators have been shown to produce acceptable level of accuracy which clearly indicates their reliability in determining the WL.

摘要

引言

本研究的目的是以组织学切片作为金标准,比较评估iRoot、iPex II和Propex pixi根尖定位仪的准确性。

材料与方法

选择30例需要拔除单根管系统单根恒牙的患者。使用iRoot、iPex II和Propex pixi确定牙齿的工作长度(WL)。然后拔除牙齿,将锉针重新插入到解剖根尖处以测量解剖根管长度(ACL),并用可流动复合树脂固定在ACL处。将牙根根尖4mm纵向刮除,在24倍体视显微镜下观察根管。评估数码照片以测量长径和短径之间的距离。由此确定WL,即短径长度(MDL)。

结果

与组织学切片获得的平均MDL相比,iRoot在±0.5mm短径范围内的平均WL测量值90%可接受,iPex II为86.66%,Propex pixi为80%。

结论

所有根尖定位仪均显示出可接受的准确度水平,这清楚表明它们在确定WL方面的可靠性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/5721507/9b2099f8e81c/JCD-20-251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/5721507/9b2099f8e81c/JCD-20-251-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/85e1/5721507/9b2099f8e81c/JCD-20-251-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of accuracy of three electronic apex locators using histological section as gold standard: An study.以组织学切片为金标准对三种电子根尖定位仪准确性的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2017 Jul-Aug;20(4):251-254. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_175_16.
2
Evaluation of Correlation Between apical Diameter and File Size Using Propex Pixi Apex Locator.使用Propex Pixi根尖定位仪评估根尖直径与锉针尺寸之间的相关性
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Dec;8(12):ZC18-20. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9307.5247. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
3
Evaluation of the accuracy of different apex locators in determining the working length during root canal retreatment.评估不同根尖定位仪在根管再治疗期间确定工作长度的准确性。
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Spring;14(2):125-129. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.026. Epub 2020 Jun 17.
4
In Vivo Evaluation of 3 Electronic Apex Locators: Root ZX Mini, Apex ID, and Propex Pixi.体内评估 3 种电子根尖定位仪:Root ZX Mini、Apex ID 和 Propex Pixi。
J Endod. 2020 Feb;46(2):158-161. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.10.035. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
5
An in vitro evaluation of the accuracy of four electronic apex locators using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium hand files.使用不锈钢和镍钛手动锉对四种电子根尖定位仪准确性的体外评估。
Restor Dent Endod. 2016 Feb;41(1):6-11. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.1.6. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
The accuracy of electronic apex locators for determining working length: An in vitro study with artificial teeth.电子根尖定位仪测量工作长度的准确性:一项针对人工牙的体外研究。
Aust Endod J. 2021 Aug;47(2):217-221. doi: 10.1111/aej.12455. Epub 2020 Dec 28.
7
An in vivo comparison of accuracy of two electronic apex locators in determining working length using stainless steel and nickel titanium files.使用不锈钢锉和镍钛锉对两种电子根尖定位仪在确定工作长度方面的准确性进行的体内比较。
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2018 May 22;10:75-82. doi: 10.2147/CCIDE.S158882. eCollection 2018.
8
An In Vitro Comparison of Propex II Apex Locator to Standard Radiographic Method.Propex II根尖定位仪与标准影像学方法的体外比较
Iran Endod J. 2013 Summer;8(3):114-7. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
A comparative evaluation of working length with digital radiography and third generation apex locator (ProPex) in the presence of various intracanal irrigants: An in vivo/ex vivo study.在存在各种根管内冲洗剂的情况下,使用数字放射成像和第三代根尖定位仪(ProPex)对工作长度进行的比较评估:一项体内/体外研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Jan;11(1):56-60.
10
Not all electronic foramen locators are accurate in teeth with enlarged apical foramina: an in vitro comparison of 5 brands.并非所有电子根管长度测定仪在根尖孔扩大的牙齿中都准确:5个品牌的体外比较
J Endod. 2014 Jan;40(1):109-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.09.032. Epub 2013 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic root canal length measurement devices: X-smart pro+, root ZX mini, and propex pixi.三种电子根管长度测量设备的体外准确性:X-smart pro+、Root ZX mini和Propex Pixi
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1072. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06482-5.
2
Comparative evaluation of efficacy in working length determination: Radiography versus Electronic apex locators using and methods with stereomicroscope validation.工作长度测定中效能的比较评估:使用[具体方法]并经体视显微镜验证的X线摄影与电子根尖定位仪的比较
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Aug;27(8):790-794. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_381_24. Epub 2024 Aug 7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A comparative evaluation of electronic and radiographic determination of root canal length in primary teeth: An in vitro study.乳牙根管长度电子测量与X线测量的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2012 Oct;3(4):416-20. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.107430.
2
Accuracies of seven different apex locators under various conditions.七种不同根尖定位仪在各种条件下的准确性。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Oct;106(4):e57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.04.001. Epub 2008 Jul 7.
3
Influence of apical constriction diameter on Root ZX apex locator precision.
Accuracy of an Electronic Apex Locator (EAL) in Measuring the Working Length of Root Canals in Comparison With Radiographs: An In Vivo Study.
与X线片相比,电子根尖定位仪测量根管工作长度的准确性:一项体内研究
Cureus. 2024 May 14;16(5):e60283. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60283. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Influence of Different Apical Foramen Morphologies on the Accuracy of Four Electronic Foramen Locators.不同根尖孔形态对四种电子根尖定位仪准确性的影响
Eur J Dent. 2024 Oct;18(4):1101-1106. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1782214. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Accuracy of different generations of apex locators in determining working length; a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同代根尖定位仪在确定工作长度方面的准确性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Saudi Dent J. 2022 Jan;34(1):11-20. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
6
The Precision of Propex Pixi with Different Instruments and Coronal Preflaring Procedures.使用不同器械和冠部预扩程序时Propex Pixi的精度
Eur Endod J. 2019 Jul 10;4(2):75-79. doi: 10.14744/eej.2019.52724. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparative Evaluation of Accuracy of Two Electronic Apex Locators in the Presence of Contemporary Irrigants: An Study.当代冲洗剂存在时两种电子根尖定位仪准确性的比较评估:一项研究
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Jul-Aug;8(4):349-353. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_50_18. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
根尖缩窄直径对Root ZX根尖定位仪精度的影响。
J Endod. 2007 Aug;33(8):995-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.05.009.
4
The accuracy of root canal measurements using the Mini Apex Locator and Root ZX-II: an evaluation in vitro.使用Mini Apex根管长度测定仪和Root ZX-II进行根管测量的准确性:一项体外评估。
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Sep;104(3):e50-3. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2007.03.025.
5
A comparison between two electronic apex locators: an ex vivo investigation.两种电子根尖定位仪的比较:一项体外研究。
Int Endod J. 2007 May;40(5):362-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01229.x. Epub 2007 Feb 19.
6
In vivo comparison of working length determination with two electronic apex locators.两种电子根尖定位仪测定工作长度的体内比较
Int Endod J. 2007 Feb;40(2):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01199.x.
7
The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length measurement devices.电子根管长度测量仪的基本工作原理。
Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):595-609. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01131.x.
8
Ex vivo accuracy of three electronic apex locators: Root ZX, Elements Diagnostic Unit and Apex Locator and ProPex.三种电子根尖定位仪的体外准确性:Root ZX、Elements诊断仪以及Apex Locator和ProPex。
Int Endod J. 2006 May;39(5):408-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01095.x.
9
Evaluation of the accuracy of three electronic apex locators using glass tubules.使用玻璃小管评估三种电子根尖定位仪的准确性。
Int Endod J. 2006 Feb;39(2):127-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01056.x.
10
An evaluation of root ZX and elements diagnostic apex locators.根ZX和元素诊断根尖定位仪的评估。
J Endod. 2005 Jul;31(7):507-9. doi: 10.1097/01.don.0000152295.05827.80.