Millis M L, Button S B
Mem Cognit. 1989 Mar;17(2):141-7. doi: 10.3758/bf03197064.
Gernsbacher (1984) found that number of word meanings (polysemy) did not influence lexical decision time when it was operationalized as number of dictionary definitions. This finding supports her contention that subjects do not store all possible dictionary meanings for words in memory. The present experiments extended Gernsbacher's research by determining whether more psychologically valid measures of polysemy affect lexical decision time. Three metrics were used to represent the meanings that subjects actually access from memory (accessible polysemy): (1) the first meanings subjects think of when asked to define stimulus words, (2) all the meanings subjects generate for words, and (3) the average number of meanings subjects generate. The results showed that the second and third metrics of polysemy influenced lexical decision time, whereas the first metric (representing mostly the access to dominant meanings for words) only approached significance.
格斯巴赫(1984年)发现,当将词义数量(一词多义)按照词典定义数量来操作化时,它并不影响词汇判断时间。这一发现支持了她的观点,即受试者不会在记忆中存储单词所有可能的词典释义。本实验扩展了格斯巴赫的研究,通过确定更具心理效度的一词多义测量方法是否会影响词汇判断时间。使用了三个指标来表示受试者实际从记忆中提取的意义(可及一词多义):(1)受试者在被要求定义刺激词时首先想到的意义,(2)受试者为单词生成的所有意义,以及(3)受试者生成的意义的平均数量。结果表明,一词多义的第二个和第三个指标影响了词汇判断时间,而第一个指标(主要代表对单词主导意义的提取)仅接近显著水平。