Gunn Rachel L, Gerst Kyle R, Lake Allison J, Finn Peter R
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Indiana University-Bloomington, Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA.
Alcohol. 2018 Feb;66:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2017.07.009. Epub 2017 Sep 23.
Executive working memory capacity (eWMC) is central to adaptive decision-making. Research has revealed reduced eWMC and higher rates of impulsive decision making in individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs: DSM-IV Alcohol Dependence of Alcohol Abuse) and antisocial psychopathology (AP). Recent work has shown that placing a load on working memory (WM) further increases impulsive decision making on the delay discounting (DD) task in those with AUDs and AP. The current study examined the effects of an attention refocusing manipulation to offset the effects of this WM-load on DD rates in control subjects, those with AUDs without AP, and AUDs with AP (AUD-AP). Results revealed that 1) the AUD-AP group had higher DD rates (i.e., more impulsive decision-making) than the AUD group, followed by controls, and 2) attention refocusing after a load is placed on WM was associated with lower DD rates compared to the load without refocusing in both AUD groups, but not controls. Results suggest that refocusing attention after a cognitive load may be an effective cognitive strategy for reducing the impulsivity-enhancing effects of cognitive load on decision making in individuals with AUDs and AP.
执行工作记忆容量(eWMC)对于适应性决策至关重要。研究表明,患有酒精使用障碍(AUDs:《精神疾病诊断与统计手册第四版》中的酒精依赖或酒精滥用)和反社会心理病理学(AP)的个体,其eWMC降低,冲动决策率更高。最近的研究表明,给工作记忆(WM)施加负荷会进一步增加患有AUDs和AP的个体在延迟折扣(DD)任务中的冲动决策。本研究考察了注意力重新聚焦操作对抵消这种WM负荷对对照组、无AP的AUDs患者以及伴有AP的AUDs患者(AUD-AP)DD率的影响。结果显示:1)AUD-AP组的DD率(即更冲动的决策)高于AUD组,其次是对照组;2)在WM施加负荷后进行注意力重新聚焦,与未重新聚焦负荷相比,两个AUD组的DD率均较低,但对照组并非如此。结果表明,在认知负荷后重新聚焦注意力可能是一种有效的认知策略,可减少认知负荷对患有AUDs和AP的个体决策中冲动性增强的影响。