Suppr超能文献

辅助技术是否有助于智障人士融入社会?一项系统评价方案。

Does assistive technology contribute to social inclusion for people with intellectual disability? A systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Owuor John, Larkan Fiona, Kayabu Bonnix, Fitzgerald Geraldine, Sheaf Greg, Dinsmore John, McConkey Roy, Clarke Mike, MacLachlan Malcolm

机构信息

Centre for Global Health (CGH), Trinity College Dublin (TCD), Dublin, Ireland.

ALL Institute, Department of Psychology, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 10;8(2):e017533. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017533.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this review is to answer the following question: Previous research on assistive technology has focused on socioeconomic impacts such as education, employment and access to healthcare by people with intellectual disability. There is a need to consolidate evidence on the interaction between intellectual disability, assistive technology, community living and social inclusion.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The review will consider studies from all settings: geographical, socioeconomic and care (institutional and community care), published in English. Studies reported in other languages with abstracts in English will be included if they can be translated using Google Translate, otherwise such studies will be included in the appendix. The review will include both qualitative and quantitative studies. The intervention in this review refers to the use of assistive technology to promote community participation or interpersonal relationships (social inclusion) for people with intellectual disability. The outcomes will be behavioural and social benefits of using assistive technology by people with intellectual disability. Enhanced interpersonal relationships and community participation by people with intellectual disability. Data analysis will be in two phases. The first phase will involve analysis of individual study designs separately. The second phase will be narrative/thematic synthesis of all study groups.

ETHICS

The review will not create any ethical or safety concerns.

DISSEMINATION

At least one peer-reviewed article in a leading journal such as the is planned. The findings will also be disseminated through a seminar session involving internal audience at Trinity College Dublin and within the Assistive Technologies for people with Intellectual Disability and Autism research programme.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017065447; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

本综述的目的是回答以下问题:以往关于辅助技术的研究主要集中在社会经济影响方面,如智障人士的教育、就业和医疗保健机会。有必要整合关于智障、辅助技术、社区生活和社会包容之间相互作用的证据。

方法与分析

本综述将考虑来自所有背景的研究:地理、社会经济和护理(机构护理和社区护理),以英文发表。如果能用谷歌翻译进行翻译,将纳入以其他语言报道且有英文摘要的研究,否则此类研究将列入附录。本综述将包括定性和定量研究。本综述中的干预措施是指使用辅助技术来促进智障人士的社区参与或人际关系(社会包容)。结果将是智障人士使用辅助技术所带来的行为和社会效益。智障人士人际关系和社区参与的增强。数据分析将分两个阶段进行。第一阶段将分别对各个研究设计进行分析。第二阶段将对所有研究组进行叙述性/主题性综合分析。

伦理

本综述不会产生任何伦理或安全问题。

传播

计划在《 》等领先期刊上发表至少一篇同行评审文章。研究结果还将通过都柏林三一学院内部受众以及智障和自闭症患者辅助技术研究项目内的研讨会进行传播。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42017065447;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/245d/5829787/c36fd4375467/bmjopen-2017-017533f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验