• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种草药漱口水和氯己定漱口水对特定牙周病原体疗效的比较评估:一项[未提及具体内容]和[未提及具体内容]研究。

Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: An and study.

作者信息

Pathan Multazim Muradkhan, Bhat Kishore Gajanan, Joshi Vinayak Mahableshwar

机构信息

Department of Molecular Biology and Immunology, Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.

Maratha Mandal's NGH Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Central Research Laboratory, Belgaum, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):270-275. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_382_16.

DOI:10.4103/jisp.jisp_382_16
PMID:29456300
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5813340/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several herbal mouthwash and herbal extracts have been tested and in search of a suitable adjunct to mechanical therapy for long-term use. In this study, we aimed to look at the antimicrobial effect of the herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine (CHX) mouthwash on select organisms in test and an model.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The antimicrobial effects were determined against standard strains of bacteria that are involved in different stages of periodontal diseases. The tests included determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using broth dilution and agar diffusion. In the part of the study supragingival dental plaque were obtained from 20 periodontally healthy adult volunteers. Descriptive analysis was done for the entire quantitative and qualitative variable recorded.

RESULTS

The MIC by broth dilution method found no statistically significant difference between the mouthwashes. The agar dilution method showed CHX was more effective as compared to the herbal mouthwash against standard strains of , , and . However, no difference was observed between the mouthwashes for , , and . The results conclude that none of the selected mouthwashes were statistically significantly different from each other.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, CHX showed higher levels of antimicrobial action than the herbal mouthwash against bacterial species. The results reinforce the earlier findings that the testing is sensitive to methods and due diligence is needed when extrapolating the data for further use. However, long-term use and effectiveness against the periopathogens need to be tested in well-planned clinical trials.

摘要

背景

已对多种草本漱口水和草本提取物进行了测试,以寻找一种适合长期用于机械治疗的辅助剂。在本研究中,我们旨在观察草本漱口水和氯己定(CHX)漱口水对测试模型中选定微生物的抗菌效果。

材料与方法

测定了对参与牙周疾病不同阶段的标准菌株的抗菌效果。测试包括使用肉汤稀释法和琼脂扩散法测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC)。在研究的一部分中,从20名牙周健康的成年志愿者中获取龈上牙菌斑。对记录的所有定量和定性变量进行了描述性分析。

结果

肉汤稀释法测定的MIC显示,漱口水之间无统计学显著差异。琼脂稀释法显示,与草本漱口水相比,CHX对标准菌株、和更有效。然而,对于、和,漱口水之间未观察到差异。研究结果得出结论,所选漱口水之间在统计学上均无显著差异。

结论

在本研究中,CHX对细菌种类的抗菌作用水平高于草本漱口水。结果强化了早期的发现,即测试对方法敏感,在推断数据以供进一步使用时需要谨慎。然而,长期使用以及对牙周病原体的有效性需要在精心设计的临床试验中进行测试。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/0dca2ebfc7e7/JISP-21-270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/a1d5366b78e5/JISP-21-270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/050d2cb8e943/JISP-21-270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/ed4e0fe70be3/JISP-21-270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/0dca2ebfc7e7/JISP-21-270-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/a1d5366b78e5/JISP-21-270-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/050d2cb8e943/JISP-21-270-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/ed4e0fe70be3/JISP-21-270-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/22fa/5813340/0dca2ebfc7e7/JISP-21-270-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the efficacy of a herbal mouthwash and chlorhexidine mouthwash on select periodontal pathogens: An and study.一种草药漱口水和氯己定漱口水对特定牙周病原体疗效的比较评估:一项[未提及具体内容]和[未提及具体内容]研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2017 Jul-Aug;21(4):270-275. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_382_16.
2
Efficacy of a mouthwash containing ε-poly-L-lysine, funme peptides and domiphen in reducing halitosis and supragingival plaque: a randomized clinical trial.含ε-聚-L-赖氨酸、富美肽和度米芬的漱口水在减轻口臭和龈上菌斑方面的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 May 3;24(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04255-0.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of Pomegranate-Containing Mouthwash Against Oral-Biofilm Forming Organisms: An Invitro Microbial Study.含石榴漱口水对口腔生物膜形成菌抗菌活性的比较评价:一项体外微生物学研究。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):ZC65-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16478.7475. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
4
The effect of herbal extracts in an experimental mouthrinse on established plaque and gingivitis.草本提取物在一种实验性漱口水对已形成菌斑和牙龈炎的影响。
J Clin Periodontol. 1998 May;25(5):399-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051x.1998.tb02462.x.
5
Analysis of Licorice () Root Extract Activity on in Comparison to Chlorhexidine and Fluoride Mouthwash.与氯己定和含氟漱口水相比,甘草根提取物对[具体对象未给出]的活性分析
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019 Dec 1;20(12):1389-1394.
6
Antimicrobial Efficacy of , , and Chlorhexidine Mouthwashes on and in Children: A Comparative Study.、和氯己定漱口水对儿童口腔内变形链球菌和远缘链球菌的抗菌效果:一项对比研究。
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;17(Suppl 1):S78-S83. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2795.
7
In vitro antimicrobial comparison of chlorhexidine, persica mouthwash and miswak extract.洗必泰、波斯漱口水和米斯瓦克提取物的体外抗菌比较。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012 Mar 1;13(2):147-52. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1111.
8
Antimicrobial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthwash Against the Adherence of Microorganism to Sutures After Periodontal Surgery: A Clinical Microbiological Study.洗必泰和草药漱口水对牙周手术后微生物黏附于缝线的抗菌活性:一项临床微生物学研究。
Cureus. 2022 Dec 24;14(12):e32907. doi: 10.7759/cureus.32907. eCollection 2022 Dec.
9
Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Probiotic, Herbal and Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Gingival Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.益生菌、草药和洗必泰漱口水对牙龈健康功效的比较评估:一项随机临床试验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Mar;11(3):ZC13-ZC16. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/23891.9462. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
10
Comparison of the Antimicrobial Activity of Calyx Extracts, Six Commercial Types of Mouthwashes, and Chlorhexidine on Oral Pathogenic Bacteria, and the Effect of Extracts and Chlorhexidine on Permeability of the Bacterial Membrane.比较花萼提取物、六种市售漱口水和洗必泰对口腔致病菌的抗菌活性,以及提取物和洗必泰对细菌膜通透性的影响。
J Med Food. 2021 Jan;24(1):67-76. doi: 10.1089/jmf.2019.0273. Epub 2020 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Lemongrass, Ash Gourd, Watermelon, Guava Extracts, Chlorhexidine Against Streptococcus mutans: An In Vitro Study.柠檬草、冬瓜、西瓜、番石榴提取物及氯己定对变形链球菌抗菌效果的评价:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2025 Jan 5;17(1):e76948. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76948. eCollection 2025 Jan.
2
Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Herbal, Chlorhexidine, and Normal Saline Mouthwash in the Management of Chronic Gingivitis.草药漱口水、洗必泰漱口水和生理盐水漱口水治疗慢性牙龈炎的临床疗效比较
Cureus. 2024 Feb 16;16(2):e54336. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54336. eCollection 2024 Feb.
3
Comparison of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Bamboo Shoot Ethanol Extract With Chlorhexidine Mouth Rinse Against Salivary Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An Ex Vivo Study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Mouthwash War - Chlorhexidine vs. Herbal Mouth Rinses: A Meta-Analysis.漱口水之战——洗必泰与草本漱口水:一项荟萃分析
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC81-3. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/16578.7815. Epub 2016 May 1.
2
Ex vivo vs. in vivo antibacterial activity of two antiseptics on oral biofilm.两种防腐剂对口腔生物膜的体外抗菌活性与体内抗菌活性比较
Front Microbiol. 2015 Jul 2;6:655. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00655. eCollection 2015.
3
Efficacy of dental floss and chlorhexidine mouth rinse as an adjunct to toothbrushing in removing plaque and gingival inflammation - a three way cross over trial.
竹笋乙醇提取物与洗必泰漱口水对唾液变形链球菌和嗜酸乳杆菌抗菌效果的比较:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jan 28;16(1):e53085. doi: 10.7759/cureus.53085. eCollection 2024 Jan.
4
Investigation of the antifungal effects of curcumin against nystatin-resistant .姜黄素对制霉菌素耐药菌的抗真菌作用研究。
Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2023 Apr 26;20:50. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparative Evaluation of a Commercial Herbal Extract and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Mouthwash on Three Periodontal Facultative Anaerobes: An In Vitro Study.一种市售草药提取物与0.2%氯己定漱口水对三种牙周兼性厌氧菌的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Int J Dent. 2022 Dec 30;2022:6359841. doi: 10.1155/2022/6359841. eCollection 2022.
6
Anti-plaque efficacy of Hi-Ora mouthrinse and 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate in patients with chronic gingivitis: A case-control study.含高氧(Hi-Ora)漱口水与0.12%葡萄糖酸氯己定对慢性牙龈炎患者的抗牙菌斑疗效:一项病例对照研究。
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1):38-43. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_368_21. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
: Nature's Gift for Periodontal Health.大自然赋予的牙周健康礼物。
Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Apr 30;10(5):712. doi: 10.3390/antiox10050712.
8
Comparison of an Herbal- and a 0.12% Chlorhexidine-based Oral Rinse as Adjuncts to Nonsurgical Mechanical Debridement in the Management of Peri-implant Mucositis: A Randomised Controlled Trial.草药漱口水与0.12%氯己定漱口水作为非手术机械清创辅助治疗种植体周围黏膜炎的比较:一项随机对照试验
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Sep 4;18(4):645-651. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a45069.
9
Efficacy of chlorhexidine rinses after periodontal or implant surgery: a systematic review.牙周或种植手术后使用洗必泰漱口液的疗效:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Jan;23(1):21-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2761-y. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
牙线和氯己定漱口水作为刷牙辅助手段在去除牙菌斑和牙龈炎症方面的疗效——一项三向交叉试验
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8807.4943. Epub 2014 Oct 20.
4
Evaluation of antiplaque and antigingivitis effect of herbal mouthwash in treatment of plaque induced gingivitis: A randomized, clinical trial.草本漱口水治疗菌斑性牙龈炎的抗牙菌斑和抗牙龈炎效果评估:一项随机临床试验。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014 Jan;18(1):48-52. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.128208.
5
Genetic diversity in the oral pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis: molecular mechanisms and biological consequences.口腔病原体牙龈卟啉单胞菌的遗传多样性:分子机制和生物学后果。
Future Microbiol. 2013 May;8(5):607-20. doi: 10.2217/fmb.13.30.
6
Antiseptic mouth rinses: an update on comparative effectiveness, risks and recommendations.抗菌漱口水:比较疗效、风险及建议的最新进展
J Dent Hyg. 2013 Feb;87(1):10-8. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
7
Comparative evaluation of 0.1% turmeric mouthwash with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate in prevention of plaque and gingivitis: A clinical and microbiological study.0.1%姜黄漱口水与0.2%葡萄糖酸氯己定预防牙菌斑和牙龈炎的比较评价:一项临床和微生物学研究。
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2012 Jul;16(3):386-91. doi: 10.4103/0972-124X.100917.
8
Antimicrobial activity ofTerminalia bellerica.诃子的抗菌活性。
Indian J Clin Biochem. 2005 Jul;20(2):150-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02867416.
9
Antimicrobial efficacy of 0·05% cetylpyridinium chloride mouthrinses.0.05%西吡氯铵含漱液的抗菌效果。
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2013 Jan;56(1):14-20. doi: 10.1111/lam.12008. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
10
The keystone-pathogen hypothesis.关键病原体假说。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012 Oct;10(10):717-25. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2873. Epub 2012 Sep 3.