• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项基于系统评价的评估急性病情况下医患沟通的量表。

A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review.

作者信息

Sustersic Mélanie, Gauchet Aurélie, Kernou Anaïs, Gibert Charlotte, Foote Alison, Vermorel Céline, Bosson Jean-Luc

机构信息

Laboratory of « Techniques de l'Ingénierie Médicale et de la Complexité, Informatique, Mathématiques et Applications », University Grenoble Alps, Grenoble, France.

Emergency Department, Groupe Hospitalier Mutualiste, Grenoble, France.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192306. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0192306
PMID:29466407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5821327/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no validated generic tool to measure Doctor-Patient-Communication (DPC) in a context of acute conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To create and validate such a scale in a real population.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

We performed a systematic review of validated DPC scales available in English. From these, using a theoretical model based on a multidisciplinary approach, we selected pertinent items that met the inclusion criteria and included them in a simple questionnaire. This tool based on a synthesis of the literature was then validated in a prospective study in two hospital emergency departments.

RESULTS

We found 22 pertinent questionnaires and scoring systems. From these, we extracted items and built a scale based on 15 questions with graded responses (Likert from 1 to 4). The mean time for questionnaire completion was 3 minutes. We included 189 adults and adolescents in the study and analyzed complete responses to the questionnaire by 149 patients, gathered over the phone one week after their consultation. The scale had high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and good external validity. Two questions were removed due to redundancy giving a scale based on 13 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

We have created an easy-to-use and validated generic questionnaire to assess DPC in a context of acute conditions, usable both in clinical research and in routine practice.

摘要

背景

在急性病情况下,尚无经过验证的通用工具来衡量医患沟通(DPC)。

目的

在实际人群中创建并验证这样一个量表。

材料与方法

我们对现有的经过验证的英文DPC量表进行了系统综述。基于多学科方法的理论模型,我们从这些量表中选择符合纳入标准的相关条目,并将其纳入一个简单的问卷中。然后,这个基于文献综合的工具在前瞻性研究中于两家医院急诊科进行了验证。

结果

我们发现了22个相关的问卷和评分系统。从中提取条目,构建了一个基于15个问题且回答有分级(李克特量表,1至4级)的量表。完成问卷的平均时间为3分钟。我们纳入了189名成年人和青少年参与研究,并对149名患者在咨询一周后通过电话收集的问卷完整回答进行了分析。该量表具有较高的内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数α = 0.89)和良好的外部效度。由于冗余,删除了两个问题,形成了一个基于13个问题的量表。

结论

我们创建了一个易于使用且经过验证的通用问卷,用于在急性病情况下评估医患沟通,可用于临床研究和日常实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/10bb79162b26/pone.0192306.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/947f25a90e7f/pone.0192306.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/184e9295ac00/pone.0192306.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/9ba3d9960ffe/pone.0192306.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/10bb79162b26/pone.0192306.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/947f25a90e7f/pone.0192306.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/184e9295ac00/pone.0192306.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/9ba3d9960ffe/pone.0192306.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9da1/5821327/10bb79162b26/pone.0192306.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A scale assessing doctor-patient communication in a context of acute conditions based on a systematic review.一项基于系统评价的评估急性病情况下医患沟通的量表。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192306. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192306. eCollection 2018.
2
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.
3
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
4
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
5
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
8
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
9
Reminiscence therapy for dementia.痴呆症的回忆疗法
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 1;3(3):CD001120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001120.pub3.
10
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and psychometric evaluation of the hospitalized patients' expectations for treatment scale-patient version-satisfaction scale.住院患者治疗期望量表-患者版-满意度量表的编制与心理测量学评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):1152. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13287-3.
2
Translation and Validation of the Malay Doctor-Patient Communication Questionnaire: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Patients Receiving Hemodialysis in Kelantan, Malaysia.马来语医患沟通问卷的翻译与验证:马来西亚吉兰丹州接受血液透析患者的横断面研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;13(16):2037. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162037.
3
Video Remote Sign Language Interpreting in Health Communication for Deaf People: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' Perspectives on Outcomes of Care After Discharge From the Emergency Department: A Qualitative Study.患者对急诊科出院后护理结果的看法:一项定性研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):648-658.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.05.034. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
2
Investigating the relationship between consultation length and patient experience: a cross-sectional study in primary care.探讨会诊时长与患者体验之间的关系:一项初级医疗保健领域的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Dec;66(653):e896-e903. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X687733. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
3
How best to use and evaluate Patient Information Leaflets given during a consultation: a systematic review of literature reviews.
面向聋人的健康交流中的视频远程手语口译:一项随机对照试验方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Dec 2;13:e64590. doi: 10.2196/64590.
4
Evaluating cancer patients' experiences with doctor-patient communication in Taiwan: development and validation of a new assessment instrument.评估台湾地区癌症患者的医患沟通体验:新评估工具的开发与验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2024 Nov 11;32(12):781. doi: 10.1007/s00520-024-08990-6.
5
Insights into medication adherence among Jordanian patients with dyslipidemia: evaluating health literacy, well-being, and doctor-patient communication.约旦血脂异常患者用药依从性洞察:评估健康素养、幸福感及医患沟通
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2024 Oct 9;17(1):2410199. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2410199. eCollection 2024.
6
Tailoring HIV Care for Black Populations: A Pilot Feasibility Prospective Cohort Study.为黑人族群量身定制艾滋病毒护理:一项试点可行性前瞻性队列研究。
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Oct 4;8:e56411. doi: 10.2196/56411.
7
Physician Communication Behaviors on Patient Satisfaction in Primary Care Medical Settings in Bangladesh.孟加拉国初级医疗保健环境中医生的医患沟通行为对患者满意度的影响
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241277396. doi: 10.1177/21501319241277396.
8
Validation of a checklist to facilitate serious illness conversations in adult emergency in China: a single-centre pilot study.中文版清单在成人急诊中促进重病沟通的有效性验证:单中心试点研究。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 7;24(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01065-z.
9
Health-related quality of life in hemato-oncology patients: role of informativeness and doctor-patient communication.血液肿瘤患者的健康相关生活质量:信息性和医患沟通的作用。
Health Psychol Res. 2024 May 26;12:117643. doi: 10.52965/001c.117643. eCollection 2024.
10
Storylines of family medicine IV: perspectives on practice-lenses of appreciation.家庭医学叙事 IV:实践视角——欣赏之镜。
Fam Med Community Health. 2024 Apr 12;12(Suppl 3):e002791. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2024-002791.
如何在咨询期间最好地使用和评估患者信息传单:文献综述的系统评价。
Health Expect. 2017 Aug;20(4):531-542. doi: 10.1111/hex.12487. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Usefulness scale for patient information material (USE) - development and psychometric properties.患者信息材料有用性量表(USE)——编制与心理测量学特性
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015 Apr 19;15:34. doi: 10.1186/s12911-015-0153-7.
5
Measurement of physician-patient communication--a systematic review.医患沟通的测量——一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 22;9(12):e112637. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112637. eCollection 2014.
6
Mind the (knowledge) gap: the effect of a communication instrument on emergency department patients' comprehension of and satisfaction with care.注意(知识)差距:一种沟通工具对急诊科患者护理理解和满意度的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Feb;98(2):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.10.020. Epub 2014 Nov 3.
7
Patients' comprehension of their emergency department encounter: a pilot study using physician observers.患者对其急诊科就诊经历的理解:一项使用医师观察员的初步研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;65(2):151-5.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.08.012. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
8
Assessing communication quality of consultations in primary care: initial reliability of the Global Consultation Rating Scale, based on the Calgary-Cambridge Guide to the Medical Interview.评估基层医疗中会诊的沟通质量:基于《卡尔加里-剑桥医学访谈指南》的全球会诊评分量表的初始信度
BMJ Open. 2014 Mar 6;4(3):e004339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004339.
9
The accident and emergency department questionnaire: a measure for patients' experiences in the accident and emergency department.急诊部问卷:用于测量患者在急诊部的就诊体验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Feb;22(2):139-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001072. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
10
Discharge communication in the emergency department: physicians underestimate the time needed.急诊科的出院沟通:医生低估了所需时间。
Swiss Med Wkly. 2012 Jun 8;142:w13588. doi: 10.4414/smw.2012.13588. eCollection 2012.