Breteler Martine J M, Huizinga Erik, van Loon Kim, Leenen Luke P H, Dohmen Daan A J, Kalkman Cor J, Blokhuis Taco J
Department of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
FocusCura, Driebergen-Rijsenburg, The Netherlands.
BMJ Open. 2018 Feb 27;8(2):e020162. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020162.
Intermittent vital signs measurements are the current standard on hospital wards, typically recorded once every 8 hours. Early signs of deterioration may therefore be missed. Recent innovations have resulted in 'wearable' sensors, which may capture patient deterioration at an earlier stage. The objective of this study was to determine whether a wireless 'patch' sensor is able to reliably measure respiratory and heart rate continuously in high-risk surgical patients. The secondary objective was to explore the potential of the wireless sensor to serve as a safety monitor.
In an observational methods comparisons study, patients were measured with both the wireless sensor and bedside routine standard for at least 24 hours.
University teaching hospital, single centre.
Twenty-five postoperative surgical patients admitted to a step-down unit.
Primary outcome measures were limits of agreement and bias of heart rate and respiratory rate. Secondary outcome measures were sensor reliability, defined as time until first occurrence of data loss.
1568 hours of vital signs data were analysed. Bias and 95% limits of agreement for heart rate were -1.1 (-8.8 to 6.5) beats per minute. For respiration rate, bias was -2.3 breaths per minute with wide limits of agreement (-15.8 to 11.2 breaths per minute). Median filtering over a 15 min period improved limits of agreement of both respiration and heart rate. 63% of the measurements were performed without data loss greater than 2 min. Overall data loss was limited (6% of time).
The wireless sensor is capable of accurately measuring heart rate, but accuracy for respiratory rate was outside acceptable limits. Remote monitoring has the potential to contribute to early recognition of physiological decline in high-risk patients. Future studies should focus on the ability to detect patient deterioration on low care environments and at home after discharge.
间歇性生命体征测量是目前医院病房的标准做法,通常每8小时记录一次。因此,可能会错过病情恶化的早期迹象。最近的创新成果产生了“可穿戴”传感器,其可能在更早阶段捕捉到患者病情恶化情况。本研究的目的是确定无线“贴片”传感器能否在高危手术患者中持续可靠地测量呼吸和心率。次要目的是探索无线传感器作为安全监测器的潜力。
在一项观察性方法比较研究中,使用无线传感器和床边常规标准对患者进行至少24小时的测量。
大学教学医院,单中心。
25名入住降级护理病房的术后手术患者。
主要观察指标是心率和呼吸频率的一致性界限和偏差。次要观察指标是传感器可靠性,定义为首次出现数据丢失前的时间。
分析了1568小时的生命体征数据。心率的偏差和95%一致性界限为每分钟-1.1次(-8.8至6.5次)。呼吸频率的偏差为每分钟-2.3次,一致性界限较宽(每分钟-15.8至11.2次)。15分钟期间的中值滤波改善了呼吸和心率的一致性界限。63%的测量在数据丢失不超过2分钟的情况下进行。总体数据丢失有限(占总时间的6%)。
无线传感器能够准确测量心率,但呼吸频率的准确性超出了可接受范围。远程监测有可能有助于早期识别高危患者的生理衰退。未来的研究应侧重于在低护理环境和出院后在家中检测患者病情恶化的能力。