• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低饲料转化率和高饲料转化率的育肥长白猪肠道微生物群组成的差异。

Differences in gut microbiota composition in finishing Landrace pigs with low and high feed conversion ratios.

作者信息

Tan Zhen, Wang Yuan, Yang Ting, Ao Hong, Chen Shaokang, Xing Kai, Zhang Fengxia, Zhao Xitong, Liu Jianfeng, Wang Chuduan

机构信息

National Engineering Laboratory for Animal Breeding, Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Animal Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China.

Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018 Sep;111(9):1673-1685. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1057-1. Epub 2018 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1007/s10482-018-1057-1
PMID:29497869
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6097733/
Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the microbial communities in the gut and feces from female finishing Landrace pigs with high and low feed conversion ratio (FCR) by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing. Many potential biomarkers can distinguish between high and low FCR groups in the duodenum, ileum, cecum, colon, and rectum, according to linear discriminant analysis effect sizes. The relative abundance of microbes were tested by Mann-Whitney test between the high and low FCR groups in different organs: Campylobacter, Prevotella and Sphaerochaeta were different in the duodenum (P < 0.05); Sanguibacter, Kingella and Anaeroplasma in jejunum; Anaeroplasma, Arthrobacter, Kingella, Megasphaera and SMB53 in the ileum; Butyricicoccus, Campylobacter, Mitsuokella, and Coprobacillus in the cecum; Lactococcus and Peptococcus in the colon; Staphylococcus in the rectum; and Rothia in feces. The prevalence of microbial genera in certain locations could potentially be used as biomarkers to distinguish between high and low FCR. Functional prediction clustering analysis suggested that bacteria in the hindgut mainly participated in carbohydrate metabolism and amino acid metabolism, and different in the relative abundance of metabolic pathways, as predicted from the microbial taxa present, were identified by comparing the high and low groups of each location. The results may provide insights for the alteration of the intestinal microbial communities to improve the growth rate of pigs.

摘要

本研究的目的是通过16S rRNA基因扩增子测序评估高饲料转化率(FCR)和低饲料转化率的雌性长白育肥猪肠道和粪便中的微生物群落。根据线性判别分析效应大小,许多潜在的生物标志物可以区分十二指肠、回肠、盲肠、结肠和直肠中的高FCR组和低FCR组。通过Mann-Whitney检验对不同器官中高FCR组和低FCR组之间的微生物相对丰度进行了测试:十二指肠中弯曲杆菌属、普雷沃氏菌属和螺旋体属存在差异(P<0.05);空肠中的血杆菌属、金氏菌属和厌氧原体属;回肠中的厌氧原体属、节杆菌属、金氏菌属、巨球形菌属和SMB53;盲肠中的丁酸球菌属、弯曲杆菌属、光岗菌属和粪杆菌属;结肠中的乳球菌属和消化球菌属;直肠中的葡萄球菌属;粪便中的罗氏菌属。某些部位微生物属的患病率可能被用作区分高FCR和低FCR的生物标志物。功能预测聚类分析表明,后肠中的细菌主要参与碳水化合物代谢和氨基酸代谢,通过比较每个部位的高组和低组,从存在的微生物分类群预测出代谢途径的相对丰度存在差异。该结果可能为改变肠道微生物群落以提高猪的生长速度提供见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/0730fc7f758a/10482_2018_1057_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/47b98c5c6c21/10482_2018_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/6096c978dbb3/10482_2018_1057_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/90c8679d0121/10482_2018_1057_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/41b084f0f9fa/10482_2018_1057_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/ea2729e9d0f7/10482_2018_1057_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/0730fc7f758a/10482_2018_1057_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/47b98c5c6c21/10482_2018_1057_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/6096c978dbb3/10482_2018_1057_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/90c8679d0121/10482_2018_1057_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/41b084f0f9fa/10482_2018_1057_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/ea2729e9d0f7/10482_2018_1057_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b938/6097733/0730fc7f758a/10482_2018_1057_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences in gut microbiota composition in finishing Landrace pigs with low and high feed conversion ratios.低饲料转化率和高饲料转化率的育肥长白猪肠道微生物群组成的差异。
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2018 Sep;111(9):1673-1685. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1057-1. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
2
A global comparison of the microbiome compositions of three gut locations in commercial pigs with extreme feed conversion ratios.商业猪三个肠道部位微生物组组成与饲料转化率极高之间的全球比较。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 14;8(1):4536. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22692-0.
3
Uncovering the composition of microbial community structure and metagenomics among three gut locations in pigs with distinct fatness.揭示不同肥胖程度猪的三个肠道部位微生物群落结构和宏基因组学的组成。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 3;6:27427. doi: 10.1038/srep27427.
4
Impact of a probiotic, inulin, or their combination on the piglets' microbiota at different intestinal locations.益生菌、菊粉或它们的组合对不同肠道部位仔猪微生物群的影响。
Benef Microbes. 2015;6(4):473-83. doi: 10.3920/BM2014.0030. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
5
Exploring a Possible Link between the Intestinal Microbiota and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.探索猪肠道微生物群与饲料效率之间的潜在联系。
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2017 Jul 17;83(15). doi: 10.1128/AEM.00380-17. Print 2017 Aug 1.
6
16S rRNA gene-based association study identified microbial taxa associated with pork intramuscular fat content in feces and cecum lumen.基于16S rRNA基因的关联研究确定了与猪粪便和盲肠腔中肌内脂肪含量相关的微生物类群。
BMC Microbiol. 2017 Jul 19;17(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12866-017-1055-x.
7
Community composition of cecal microbiota in commercial yellow broilers with high and low feed efficiencies.商业黄羽肉鸡高、低饲料效率鸡盲肠微生物群落组成。
Poult Sci. 2021 Apr;100(4):100996. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.01.019. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
8
Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency.肠道宏基因组分析揭示了乳酸杆菌和盲肠微生物群在鸡饲料效率中的突出作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7:45308. doi: 10.1038/srep45308.
9
Gut microbiome composition differences among breeds impact feed efficiency in swine.不同品种猪的肠道微生物组成差异影响饲料效率。
Microbiome. 2020 Jul 22;8(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00888-9.
10
Microbial community composition along the digestive tract in forage- and grain-fed bison.以草料和谷物为食的野牛消化道内的微生物群落组成
BMC Vet Res. 2017 Aug 17;13(1):253. doi: 10.1186/s12917-017-1161-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Faecal microbiota differences between an autochthonous pig breed and a commercial line.一个本地猪种和一个商业品系之间的粪便微生物群差异。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 1;15(1):32176. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13460-y.
2
Differences in rectal fecal microbes among Hu sheep, Tibetan sheep, and their hybrid breeds and their relationship with growth traits.湖羊、藏羊及其杂交品种直肠粪便微生物的差异及其与生长性状的关系。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jul;13(7):e0179224. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01792-24. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Enterotoxigenic as a Modulator of the Entero-Pulmonary Axis in Piglets: Impacts on the Microbiota and Immune Responses.

本文引用的文献

1
Differentially expressed genes in the caecal and colonic mucosa of Landrace finishing pigs with high and low food conversion ratios.高、低饲料转化率长白猪盲肠和结肠黏膜差异表达基因。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 2;7(1):14886. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14568-6.
2
Metagenomic Analysis of Cecal Microbiome Identified Microbiota and Functional Capacities Associated with Feed Efficiency in Landrace Finishing Pigs.盲肠微生物组的宏基因组分析确定了与长白育肥猪饲料效率相关的微生物群及其功能能力。
Front Microbiol. 2017 Aug 11;8:1546. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01546. eCollection 2017.
3
Gut metagenomic analysis reveals prominent roles of Lactobacillus and cecal microbiota in chicken feed efficiency.
产肠毒素作为仔猪肠肺轴的调节剂:对微生物群和免疫反应的影响。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2025 Feb 22;2025:8865503. doi: 10.1155/tbed/8865503. eCollection 2025.
4
Feed efficiency and fecal microbiome of nursery pigs from parents with divergent breeding value for feed conversion ratio.来自饲料转化率育种值不同的亲本的保育猪的饲料效率和粪便微生物群。
Transl Anim Sci. 2025 Feb 20;9:txaf026. doi: 10.1093/tas/txaf026. eCollection 2025.
5
Differences in production performance, fore-digestive tract microbiota, and expression levels of nutrient transporters of Hu sheep with different feed conversion ratio.不同饲料转化率的湖羊在生产性能、前消化道微生物群及营养物质转运蛋白表达水平上的差异。
Microbiol Spectr. 2025 Jun 3;13(6):e0142324. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01423-24. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
6
Supplementation with Rare Earth-Chitosan Chelate Improves Tibia Quality, Disease Resistance Capacity, and Performance in Nursery Pigs.补充稀土-壳聚糖螯合物可改善保育猪的胫骨质量、抗病能力和生产性能。
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Mar 7;26(6):2409. doi: 10.3390/ijms26062409.
7
- Invited Review - Challenges and constraints to the sustainability of poultry farming in China.特邀综述——中国家禽养殖可持续发展面临的挑战与制约因素
Anim Biosci. 2025 Apr;38(4):789-801. doi: 10.5713/ab.24.0794. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
8
Gastrointestinal microbiota and metabolites responses to dietary cereal grains in an adult pig model.成年猪模型中胃肠道微生物群和代谢产物对膳食谷物的反应。
Front Microbiol. 2024 Sep 17;15:1442077. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1442077. eCollection 2024.
9
A new approach: preventive protocols with yeast products and essential oils can reduce the in-feed use of antibiotics in growing-finishing pigs.一种新方法:使用酵母产品和精油的预防方案可减少生长育肥猪饲料中抗生素的使用。
Transl Anim Sci. 2024 Jul 13;8:txae104. doi: 10.1093/tas/txae104. eCollection 2024.
10
The sub-MIC selective window decreases along the digestive tract: determination of the minimal selective concentration of oxytetracycline in sterilised intestinal contents.亚抑菌浓度选择窗沿消化道减小:土霉素在无菌肠内容物中的最小选择浓度的测定
Front Microbiol. 2024 Jun 14;15:1377159. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1377159. eCollection 2024.
肠道宏基因组分析揭示了乳酸杆菌和盲肠微生物群在鸡饲料效率中的突出作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 28;7:45308. doi: 10.1038/srep45308.
4
Uncovering the composition of microbial community structure and metagenomics among three gut locations in pigs with distinct fatness.揭示不同肥胖程度猪的三个肠道部位微生物群落结构和宏基因组学的组成。
Sci Rep. 2016 Jun 3;6:27427. doi: 10.1038/srep27427.
5
Phylogenetic network analysis applied to pig gut microbiota identifies an ecosystem structure linked with growth traits.应用于猪肠道微生物群的系统发育网络分析确定了一种与生长性状相关的生态系统结构。
ISME J. 2016 Dec;10(12):2973-2977. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.77. Epub 2016 May 13.
6
Transcriptome analysis of mRNA and miRNA in skeletal muscle indicates an important network for differential Residual Feed Intake in pigs.猪骨骼肌中mRNA和miRNA的转录组分析表明了一个与猪差异剩余采食量相关的重要网络。
Sci Rep. 2015 Jul 7;5:11953. doi: 10.1038/srep11953.
7
Comparison of fecal and cecal microbiotas reveals qualitative similarities but quantitative differences.粪便和盲肠微生物群的比较揭示了质的相似性但量的差异。
BMC Microbiol. 2015 Feb 27;15:51. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0388-6.
8
The pig gut microbial diversity: Understanding the pig gut microbial ecology through the next generation high throughput sequencing.猪肠道微生物多样性:通过下一代高通量测序了解猪肠道微生物生态
Vet Microbiol. 2015 Jun 12;177(3-4):242-51. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.03.014. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
9
Analysis of swine fecal microbiota at various growth stages.不同生长阶段猪粪便微生物群的分析。
Arch Microbiol. 2015 Aug;197(6):753-9. doi: 10.1007/s00203-015-1108-1. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
10
Characterization of the Fecal Microbial Communities of Duroc Pigs Using 16S rRNA Gene Pyrosequencing.利用16S rRNA基因焦磷酸测序法对杜洛克猪粪便微生物群落进行表征
Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2015 Apr;28(4):584-91. doi: 10.5713/ajas.14.0651.