Oleson K W, Anderson G B, Jones B, McGinnis S A, Sanderson B
National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80307, 303-497-1332, FAX: 303-497-1348,
Colorado State University, Department of Environmental & Radiological Health Sciences, Fort Collins, CO 80523.
Clim Change. 2018 Feb;146(3-4):377-392. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1504-1. Epub 2015 Sep 23.
Previous studies examining future changes in heat/cold waves using climate model ensembles have been limited to grid cell-average quantities. Here, we make use of an urban parameterization in the Community Earth System Model (CESM) that represents the urban heat island effect, which can exacerbate extreme heat but may ameliorate extreme cold in urban relative to rural areas. Heat/cold wave characteristics are derived for U.S. regions from a bias-corrected CESM 30-member ensemble for climate outcomes driven by the RCP8.5 forcing scenario and a 15-member ensemble driven by RCP4.5. Significant differences are found between urban and grid cell-average heat/cold wave characteristics. Most notably, urban heat waves for 1981-2005 are more intense than grid cell-average by 2.1°C (southeast) to 4.6°C (southwest), while cold waves are less intense. We assess the avoided climate impacts of urban heat/cold waves in 2061-2080 when following the lower forcing scenario. Urban heat wave days per year increase from 6 in 1981-2005 to up to 92 (southeast) in RCP8.5. Following RCP4.5 reduces heat wave days by about 50%. Large avoided impacts are demonstrated for individual communities; e.g., the longest heat wave for Houston in RCP4.5 is 38 days while in RCP8.5 there is one heat wave per year that is longer than a month with some lasting the entire summer. Heat waves also start later in the season in RCP4.5 (earliest are in early May) than RCP8.5 (mid-April), compared to 1981-2005 (late May). In some communities, cold wave events decrease from 2 per year for 1981-2005 to one-in-five year events in RCP4.5 and one-in-ten year events in RCP8.5.
此前使用气候模式集合研究热浪/寒潮未来变化的研究仅限于网格单元平均量。在此,我们利用社区地球系统模型(CESM)中的城市参数化来表示城市热岛效应,相对于农村地区,这种效应会加剧极端高温,但可能会缓解极端低温。利用CESM 30成员集合对由RCP8.5强迫情景驱动的气候结果进行偏差校正,以及利用15成员集合对由RCP4.5驱动的气候结果进行偏差校正,得出美国各地区的热浪/寒潮特征。城市和网格单元平均热浪/寒潮特征之间存在显著差异。最值得注意的是,1981 - 2005年城市热浪比网格单元平均热浪强度高2.1°C(东南部)至4.6°C(西南部),而寒潮强度则较弱。我们评估了在遵循较低强迫情景时2061 - 2080年城市热浪/寒潮避免的气候影响。每年城市热浪天数从1981 - 2005年的6天增加到RCP。遵循RCP4.5可使热浪天数减少约50%。各社区都显示出巨大的避免影响;例如,休斯顿在RCP4.5中的最长热浪为38天,而在RCP8.5中每年有一次热浪持续时间超过一个月,有些甚至持续整个夏季。与1981 - 2005年(5月下旬)相比,RCP4.5中热浪开始的季节也比RCP8.5(4月中旬)晚(最早在5月初)。在一些社区,寒潮事件从1981 - 2005年的每年2次减少到RCP4.5中的每五年一次和RCP8.5中的每十年一次。 8.5中的92天(东南部)。
(注:原文中“RCP4.5 reduces heat wave days by about 50%. Large avoided impacts are demonstrated for individual communities; e.g., the longest heat wave for Houston in RCP4.5 is 38 days while in RCP8.5 there is one heat wave per year that is longer than a month with some lasting the entire summer. Heat waves also start later in the season in RCP4.5 (earliest are in early May) than RCP8.5 (mid-April), compared to 1981-2005 (late May). In some communities, cold wave events decrease from 2 per year for 1981-2005 to one-in-five year events in RCP4.5 and one-in-ten year events in RCP8.5.”部分内容似乎不完整,翻译时尽量按照现有内容翻译,但可能会存在理解上的不连贯性。)